Split Thread AA77 FBI Investigation [split from: AA77 FDR Data, Explained]

[ULTIMA1]

Nobody from the FBI is quoted in that article.

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=44840

But you cannot dabate the 30 days or the fact that the FBI ended working the crime scene on Sept 26.

 

[Gavron]

I sure didnt see anybody from the FBI quoted in that link. Did anyone else?

 

[ULTIMA1]

I sure didnt see anybody from the FBI quoted in that link. Did anyone else?

Cheery picking again i see.

 

[BigAl]

Originally Posted by Gavron View Post
I sure didnt see anybody from the FBI quoted in that link. Did anyone else?

Cheery picking again i see.

You don't have a first-hand source from the FBI.

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=44840

 

[Jackanory]

Why are you so scared of the truth?

I can post more facts and evidence then you, so whay are you so scared?

So far you have failed to post any facts or evdence to answer or debate anything i have posted.

I am still waiting for you to do what you keep telling us your doing!

Post that evidence and those facts that you keep referring too Roger - then you may get to actually debate something whorthwhile!

In the meantime, please continue posting as you do. A sure fire way of convincing any 'lurker' or 'unsure' that the official story is the only story.

 

[ULTIMA1]

You don't have a first-hand source from the FBI.

If i did your track record shows you would find some excuse not to accept it either.

 

[Gavron]

Please show us the FBI official who provided the information here, Roger:

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=44840

Why wasnt the FBI quoted at all?

 

[ULTIMA1]

Please show us the FBI official who provided the information here, Roger:

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=44840

Why wasnt the FBI quoted at all?

Please show me that you can accept and admit to the evidence that gets shown.

 

[Gavron]

Thank you for admitting you cannot provide evidence when asked for. Guess everyone here can just abide by evidence that was used in a court of law.

http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution.html

 

[BigAl]

Please show me that you can accept and admit to the evidence that gets shown.

I for one don't accept only a second hand quote for the one month estimate.

 

[Seymour Butz]

If i did your track record shows you would find some excuse not to accept it either.

So then you used a media report as your source for the 30 day statement, rather than an official statement from an FBI spokesman.

Isn't that what you bug others about?

 

[ULTIMA1]

Guess everyone here can just abide by evidence that was used in a court of law.

You mean the evidence that would be completly torn apart by any good lawyer now.

 

[ULTIMA1]

I for one don't accept only a second hand quote for the one month estimate.

Seems more like you wont accept any at all.

 

[ULTIMA1]

So then you used a media report as your source for the 30 day statement, rather than an official statement from an FBI spokesman.

Sorry but Defenselink is not just a media report.

You cannot debate it like i can deabte the main stream media reports.

 

[BigAl]

Seems more like you wont accept any at all.

Dodge and weave much?

The 30 day quote is second-hand.

 

[Gavron]

You mean the evidence that would be completly torn apart by any good lawyer now.

Apparently not. It was good enough for the Moussaoui trial, and he was convicted. are you saying his law team sucked then? Why dont you go before the courts and ask to represent Moussaoui then, if your evidence is so much better?

 

[Seymour Butz]

Sorry but Defenselink is not just a media report.

They got the "30 day" wrong.

 

[Mince]

But you cannot dabate the 30 days or the fact that the FBI ended working the crime scene on Sept 26.

That doesn't mean they stopped the investigation. Please show me in a manual where it indicates that FBI crime scene investigations must be of a prescribed length.

Thanks in advance.

 

[BasqueArch]

Originally Posted by Gavron
Please show us the FBI official who provided the information here, Roger:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/news....aspx?id=44840
Why wasnt the FBI quoted at all?

Please show me that you can accept and admit to the evidence that gets shown.

his irony to me is like those nycean banks of yore
at a distance stay
ignore his pleas for cheese souffle.

 

[ULTIMA1]

Apparently not. It was good enough for the Moussaoui trial, and he was convicted. ?

I am saying that the evidence was used for a trial not a crime scene investigation. I mean it cannot even show something as simple as the wheel at the Pentagon being from AA77.

Lawyers would have lots fun tearing up your so called evidence that supports the official story