It could show the 9/11 commission was wrong when it stated no fighters were near the planes on 9/11.
-
Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
Split Thread AA77 FBI Investigation [split from: AA77 FDR Data, Explained]
- Thread starter ULTIMA1
- Start date
It could show the 9/11 commission was wrong when it stated no fighters were near the planes on 9/11.
TJM
Potsing Whiled Runk
It's more likely to show that 93 collided with an iceberg.
JoeyDonuts
Frequencies Not Known To Normals
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2008
- Messages
- 10,536
Sure, sport. Knock yourself out. Keep in mind, this is what you said:
Seymour Butz said:
ULTIMA1 said:
What are these "very few" secure sites that can be accessed from your home or library?
Others are now listening.
Your 5 day FBI delusion is done. You were wrong and proved yourself wrong; and this post you made is typical of most.
BigAl
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2007
- Messages
- 5,397
Seymour Butz
Muse
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2008
- Messages
- 884
Now watch what happens. It would be just fine to say that you're right, he responded incorrectly. There's no shame in admitting that he's wrong about that.
But that's NOT what trolls do.
Best post EVER about trolls:
A team of dedicated troll zoologists has spent the past five years observing the troll in its natural habitat. Here are their findings:
Trolling 101:
If you happen to play poker, understand that professional trolls utilize a very similar strategy: Tight-aggressive
Tight: Don't give the victim an inch! Never admit the possibility of ever having been wrong. Never say anything which can be remotely useful or helpful to anyone. Never provide the prey with a single word he may wish to hear. Give nothing!
Aggressive: Focus! Your goal is not conversation or debate, but the exact opposite- nihilism. Mercy is merely a handicap of the weak. You are a disease with only one goal in mind: writing whatever it takes to piss off the victim. Contradict yourself all the time, repeat the victim's words verbatim like a bratty child, take the high road and repeatedly request that the victim stay on topic, post in every single thread and then accuse the victim of 'stalking' when he shows up in one of them, make ridiculous statements- but do it assertively and repeatedly, but most importantly:
Laugh when nothing is funny!
Laugh at the victim constantly, use smiley faces, and pretend to completely miss every single point he tries to make. Remember, looking like a complete idiot yourself is unavoidable if you wish to troll at the professional level.
Another key troll tactic is the practice of winning by losing. While the victim is trying to put forward solid and convincing facts to prove his position, the troll's only goal is to infuriate its prey. The troll takes (what it knows to be) a badly flawed, wholly illogical argument, and then vigorously defends it while mocking and insulting its prey. The troll looks like a complete idiot, but this is all part of the plan. The victim becomes noticeably angry by trying to repeatedly explain the flaws of the troll's argument. Provoking this anger was the troll's one and only goal from the very beginning.
Another important trolling tip I learned by observing the troll's work: The lioness does not indiscriminately launch an attack on every animal she wishes to eat. She stalks her prey, determining which specific individual antelope is weak, tired and slow. The expert troll must use this very approach, as not every post is worth trolling. The troll specifically waits for someone to discuss a topic which is of great personal importance to the prey. With an innate sense of unyielding discipline- a product of millions of years of painstaking troll evolution, the troll crouches in the brush, patiently waiting for an emotional, dedicated post. A post where the prey feels so strongly about a certain topic, he can't restrain his emotional enthusiasm when arguing his point. Any post of this sort in P&R is guaranteed to spark a trolling effort. The predator will then deftly pounce upon its prey, pretending to laugh hysterically at the victim's strong willed, passionate assertions while distorting them in straw-man fashion. Eye on the prize, the creature will then tightly lock its fangs around the prey's neck, clinging tightly to the jugular while deftly wringing the life from its prey until the victim cracks- i.e., becomes highly frustrated and visibly redfaced. This in turn provides the troll with its well earned nourishment, as well as the creature's only source of sexual gratification: Furious anger and anguish. Thus, the circle of life continues.
HawksFan
Muse
Methinks Ultima1 has been watching too many episodes of CSI.
Fun and easy to prove you wrong with facts. You should try posting facts sometime.
As you can see the FBI took over the crime scene on Sept. 21, then estimated the crime scene investigation would take a month. The FBI ended the crime scene investigation on Sept. 26, if you do the math thats 5 days.
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=44840
The FBI assumed crime-scene jurisdiction at the Pentagon terrorist attack site Sept. 21 from the Arlington County (Va.) Fire Department, officials said.
FBI officials estimate the crime scene investigation would last about a month, Arlington Fire Chief Edward P. Plaugher said. He said he expects "additional remains will be discovered during the course of the FBI investigation" and mortuary specialists will remain on site to process them.
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Sep2001/n0..._200109266.html
WASHINGTON, Sept. 26, 2001 -- The FBI handed over Pentagon crash site management to the Army Military District of Washington at 7 a.m. today.
The transfer of responsibility marks the end of the FBI's crime scene investigation following the Sept. 11 terrorist attack against the Pentagon.
Maybe it makes no sense to you because you have not read the 9/11 commission report.
Why don't you try reading it, since you put so much faith in it.
Wrong again. This doesnt work Roger. Give us something new.
If you would have read my post you can see that i never stated the sites were secure.
Sorry but its in black and white right in front of you that on Sept 21 the FBI estimated it would take a month to do the investigation.
On Sept. 26 they ended the investigation. Even a child can do the math and see thats its 5 days.
BigAl
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2007
- Messages
- 5,397
You think we don't remember from yesterday? What you've been "quoting" was a second-hand quote of an estimate.
For someone that demands the highest standards for first-hand quotes from others, I'm shocked.
The cherry picked sentences that you post are a snippet from a second handers statement/document Roger. Semantics paired with a lack of reading comprehension has also blinded your opinion. It does not mean or say what you think it does Roger.
BigAl
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2007
- Messages
- 5,397
The "FBI" didn't say it. Someone said the FBI said it. Anyone could and would reject that as too far removed.
LOL, next time read you own posts before proving yourself in need of your own advice.
Last edited:
BigAl
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2007
- Messages
- 5,397
It's seconds hand quote and an admitted estimate at that. It counts for nothing.