• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

A Thread to discuss old Bigfoot Threads

Drewbot

Philosopher
Drewbot
Joined
Sep 13, 2007
Messages
7,752
This is a thread that brings back some of the hidden threads that the new forum has made difficult to find.
Discussion about any great posts or comments is welcomed. Some of the old threads are not able to be commented on anymore, so this is the place.

BIGFOOT- Anybody seen one? a massive 301 page general discussion about Bigfoot sightings.
D

Moderated Thread 'Bigfoot- Anybody Seen one?'

Just spotted the thread about the Patterson film, and looking over at it they're seems to be some people claiming to not only believe in bigfoot but claim to have seen one, not im not sure if this is sarcasm, but what the hell....anyone seen a real life sasquatch?
Part 2 continues here for another 38 pages:
ChrisBFRPKY

Thread 'Bigfoot - has anybody seen one? Part II.'

Vortigern99 said:
This is because you have no background in, or understanding of, primate physiology. Subtle, millimetric differences in facial and somatic features can and do determine which species a given animal belongs to. All that's required is 1) knowledge and 2) close analysis of existing data.



There are exactly zero pictures of bigfoot, or of any animal purported to be bigfoot, that are as clear and evidential as the 1906 picture under discussion.

You haven't seen the photo, have you?



The standard of proof does not differ. You're mistaken.

You're also missing the larger point, which is...
Click to expand...

The Valley of the Wood Apes Part 1 - a 178 page thread about the NAWAC and their NAWACKY Antics.
jerrywayne

Thread 'The Valley of the Wood Apes'

We probably should have a separate thread for the issue of the NAWAC claims concerning the existence of bi-pedal apes in southeastern Oklahoma.

At least one well-known skeptic, Sharon Hill, has made these intriguing statements about the recently released report by NAWAC:

"Fascinating! What do we make of these lithic salutations (as I call them)? What the hell is going on out there? I've contacted Brian Brown for more details. This is not the work of hoaxers."

"Four years and multiple researchers experiencing multiple events. It's absurd to conclude this is a hoax. But if it's Bigfoots...
Part 2 continues here for another 13 pages:?
The Shrike

Cont: Thread 'The Valley of the Wood Apes, part 2'

So these wood apes? Not a thing.

ABP - brilliant insight about drying out the birches! Love that deep wintergreen aroma of cut birch. I also love teaching greenhorns about chewing on birch twigs for that flavor.


Thread continued from here. You may, of course, respond to any of the posts from that thread here.
Posted By: zooterkin

Bigfoot Follies- One of the older threads starting in 2005 and going on until 2015 236 pages
D

Merged Thread 'Bigfoot follies'

Yeah! I passed the rigorous JREF background screening and security checks so I can start being a nuisance here with my first post. I have been following the anticipation of, and the reaction to, the latest Bigfoot video which was screened on A Current Affair last night. The discussion group is here:http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/04/24/140559.php
Among all the woo wooing and name calling is a post from a law student attending classes with a lady who knows these latest hoaxers. I thought you might find it amusing:

Duggie, I'm not sure we want to be pasting entire posts from...
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Phil
Part Deux continues here for another 195 pages
Pterodactyl

Thread 'Bigfoot Follies: part deux'

This is a continuation from the previous thread which can be found HERE. As always, the split point is arbitrary and participants are free to quote from the previous thread into this one.
Posted By: Agatha




I can't think of a super power that Bigfoot hasn't been accused of possessing:

Size and strength of the Hulk
Speed of the Flash
Mind Powers of Professor X
Ability to create portals and transport like Nightcrawler
Tony Stark like intelligence and ability to manipulate technology
Hairiness of Wolverine
The ability to flutter in people's ears like the Tick's sidekick moth Arthur

Bigfoot the Patterson Gimlin Film Thread- Part 3 (CANT FIND 1 OR 2) 3 - 516 pages
J

Thread 'Bigfoot: The Patterson Gimlin Film - Part 3'

I find it interesting... Esteban Sarmiento talks of how dermal ridges
and scars etc can be faked. Just skip Chilcutt and go to 2:03 in the video.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=M15H9WGzWbw

And if you're really bored watch this. Seven parts,,, if you can take the torture.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=GHK2O6ARpB8&feature=related
Part 4- https://internationalskeptics.com/forums/threads/bigfoot-the-patterson-gimlin-film-part-4.249835/
Part 5- https://internationalskeptics.com/forums/threads/bigfoot-the-patterson-gimlin-film-part-5.295766/

The PG Film Bob Heironimus as Patty- Currently appropriate considering the new documentary, includes Kitakaze's reasons why BobH is Patty
SweatyYeti

Thread 'The PG Film - Bob Heironimus and Patty'

This thread is for analysis of any evidence which relates to whether or not Bob Heironimus could have been Patty.

That includes:
1) Comparing Patty's apparent body proportions to Bob's....and, by extension, to humans, in general.

....and also...

2) All other types of evidence which relate to Bob H. possibly being the subject of the film.


Analysis of other aspects of Patty's hide...or "suit"....such as 'apparent muscle movements', can be done in a separate thread.

Would like to find the threads about BLAARGING, The Thread about the Munns Report, which moderators are currently reviewing for reactivation due to the current news of Bill Munns being in the new documentary.
 
Last edited:
I think at least one Bill Munns thread got put into Deep Storage because he threatened to sue.
 
Yes, but that was a garbage threat.
They just did that as policy back then, now that he is in the news, i hope they find it appropriate to bring it back. There was a trove of Munns debunking in that thread.
 
Carlotta said:
What threads was Creekfreak in?
Click to expand...
Here is one of them, but I think there was one before this I can't find

kitakaze

Thread 'Creekfreak's Bigfoot hair samples and other non-photo related claims.'

Creekfreak said:
Ive got 4 large amounts of different hair samples from bigfoots if anyone wants to pay for them to be dna tested let me know .
I will give them up for free just to shut some of you up .
Click to expand...
I'd like to ask that the discussion from 'Another Bigfoot Thread' concerning the hair samples be merged here. I'd rather not but it may be best to set this thread to moderated status from the beginning considering past performances. I would really hope that it wouldn't be necessary.
 
You heard about the new PGF documentary?
It's got the Bigfooters in absolute shambles.
 
I posted one Creekfreak thread above, but there was another one that discussed the helicopter photo that he photoshopped. I can't find it.
I also thought there was one that played on his famous Bungle in the Jnugle thread at BFF, but I could be crossing forums up.
 
Andy_Ross said:
What is there to discuss?

Has anyone found a Bigfoot or is it still Larping bollocks?
Click to expand...
I found participating in the thread on indigenous/First Nations stories being used as proof of Bigfoot entertaining as well as educational.

Not so much Munns threads. That was mostly fighting his disingenuousness.
 
Last edited:
We sure have had a colorful cast of characters come here to argue their belief in Bigfoot. Those were the days.
 
Speaking of technology, AI, and Bigfoot, I've suddenly noticed a surge of extremely 'clear' photos and videos of the Sas appearing in social media--or maybe it has been surging for a while but I just wasn't paying attention. From my cursory glance at comments, it seems the reception is about 1=2/3 "this is AI BS" and 1/3 "I have seen Bigfoot and this is legit--he really looks like that"
Not sure what to make of that breakdown other than I'm glad he is not running for office (Yet(i))
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom