WTC Dust
Illuminator
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2010
- Messages
- 3,529
I guess you've never done that kind of mathematical modeling, then. It's a valid technique.
Ah, so you agree she knowingly makes an entirely invalid argument.
If a financial officer of a corporation said, "We didn't disregard losses, we set the value of cost of operations to zero in order to investigate the profit alone," and had actually done so, he or she would go to prison.
There's nothing criminal about perpetrating the exact same kind of deception in a casual scientific argument, but it's every bit as fraudulent, and (because a lot of barely scientifically literate people are not aware that momentum transfer is never zero in any real-world collision) rather more deceptive.
Fortunately, no one in a position to actually alter the historical narrative of 9/11 will fall for the deception, so no harm is done.
Respectfully,
Myriad