• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged 9/11 No Plane/Energy Weapon discussion thread

She can't make the connection because there isn't one. She can look at a few pictures of tornado/hurricane damage and claim it looks "strange" or "similar"

I can do that, it's easy. Post a picture of a piece of wood embedded in something from a tornado aftermath and a plane part embedded in WTC facade (the picture you no-planers avoid like plague), and claim it's related.
 
Last edited:
It does indeed seem odd that there would be airborne smoke in the Deutsche Bank so long after the event.

MM

Thank you, MM. The first few times I caught a whiff of it while walking my dogs in the neighborhood, I tried to convince myself that it wasn't the WTC stench, but I think it was. After the article came out, and after I talked to the street cleaner guy about the difficult-to-remove dust in the corners of the sidewalks next to the Deutsche Bank, I came to the conclusion that it was still fuming all those years later.

What isn't in doubt is that they repaired the Deutsche Bank and then decided to deconstruct it after the repair. Here's what the Deutsche Bank looked like after the attacks.
 

Attachments

  • Deutsche Bank 2.jpg
    Deutsche Bank 2.jpg
    26.9 KB · Views: 214
  • Deutsche Bank 5.jpg
    Deutsche Bank 5.jpg
    58 KB · Views: 3
  • Deutsche Bank 3.jpg
    Deutsche Bank 3.jpg
    41.4 KB · Views: 3
  • Deutsche Bank 4.jpg
    Deutsche Bank 4.jpg
    67.1 KB · Views: 3
Here is a picture of the repaired Deutsche Bank, before they decided to deconstruct it.
 

Attachments

  • Deutsche Bank 8.jpg
    Deutsche Bank 8.jpg
    99.3 KB · Views: 215
Here's another post-repair/pre-deconstruction pic of the Deutsche Bank.
 

Attachments

  • deutsche bank 9.jpg
    deutsche bank 9.jpg
    98.6 KB · Views: 5
Thank you, MM. The first few times I caught a whiff of it while walking my dogs in the neighborhood, I tried to convince myself that it wasn't the WTC stench, but I think it was. After the article came out, and after I talked to the street cleaner guy about the difficult-to-remove dust in the corners of the sidewalks next to the Deutsche Bank, I came to the conclusion that it was still fuming all those years later.

What isn't in doubt is that they repaired the Deutsche Bank and then decided to deconstruct it after the repair. Here's what the Deutsche Bank looked like after the attacks.

What about all the other damaged but surviving structures? Do they "fume" still?
 
Here's a picture of the strange fire of 2007. There was nothing inside these buildings, by the way. It was almost empty floors, a steel framework, and a mesh covering with outside scaffolding at the time of the fire. Nothing TO catch fire inside, certainly not this serious and fatal fire.
 

Attachments

  • deutsche bank 6.jpg
    deutsche bank 6.jpg
    80.9 KB · Views: 217
One last pic for now is a NIST pic of a strangely warped beam inside the very spot of the Deutsche Bank that was damaged. Right in the center, you see a warped beam. This cannot be from the impact of anything falling downward onto it.
 

Attachments

  • deutsche bank 7.jpg
    deutsche bank 7.jpg
    94.1 KB · Views: 22
I think the beam operator guy did a boo-boo. He accidentally zapped the Deutsche Bank. Bad beam guy! Bad!
 

Attachments

  • Deutsche Bank 1.jpg
    Deutsche Bank 1.jpg
    93.1 KB · Views: 4
  • boss.jpg
    boss.jpg
    33 KB · Views: 4
  • gun.jpg
    gun.jpg
    37.5 KB · Views: 3
...
When you look at early pictures of the damage, you'll notice that relatively little of the WTC buildings ended up inside the footprints of the building. It can be said that the vast majority of the building material moved radially outward from the center of the building footprints. The pile above the footprints were not much more than two stories, if that. I saw this with my own eyes less than 72 hours after the attacks. There were some taller pieces leaning over, but not above the footprint. Horizontal motion is not adequately explained with the gravity collapse model.
...

I'm glad to see that you are finally admitting that the towers were not dustified/foamified/jellified. That's a real improvement.

What finally changed your mind?
 
I think the beam operator guy did a boo-boo. He accidentally zapped the Deutsche Bank. Bad beam guy! Bad!

The guy on the right appears not to have any hands. Is this why he's making the other guy push the buttons?
 
So would every movie theater owner/company in the world. How cool would that be? I bet it could even bring back the drive-in.

:cool:

Such a technology would have other applications as well and would change pretty much everything as we know it. You know, like the Internet did.

Whomever invents it would become so filthy rich they could probably buy themselves a country or two. And they would get the Nobel, at the very least.
 
If one billiard ball can't fall until the next billiard ball reaches it, then the timing of the demise of the WTC buildings didn't match a gravity collapse model.

Obviously you haven't a clue what you're saying here..Only repeating what Judy has said. You won't break away from your intellectual laziness and understand physics, so you remain consistent at failing...Pat yourself on the back.
 
Such a technology would have other applications as well and would change pretty much everything as we know it. You know, like the Internet did.

Whomever invents it would become so filthy rich they could probably buy themselves a country or two. And they would get the Nobel, at the very least.

But you forget, these are not beings motivated by money. They are perhaps aliens with different needs and desires. Maybe they are the reptoids that David Ike talks about. Beings like this...who knows what they want from us?
 
But you forget, these are not beings motivated by money. They are perhaps aliens with different needs and desires. Maybe they are the reptoids that David Ike talks about. Beings like this...who knows what they want from us?

They "want" you to stop derailing this thread with all this alien garbage.
 
You didn't really answer my question as to why there was "smoke" accumulation in a years-dead building.

As pointed out, it was answered YEARS AGO....you just don't "like" the answer...


...and now you have completely ignored that answer, and acting like it's a brand new claim...


A miserable FAIL.
 
Here's a picture of the strange fire of 2007. There was nothing inside these buildings, by the way. It was almost empty floors, a steel framework, and a mesh covering with outside scaffolding at the time of the fire. Nothing TO catch fire inside, certainly not this serious and fatal fire.

Deliberately ignoring facts is what you do Tracy. FACTS destroy all your arguments of ignorance.

"Scoppetta said that the fire was a particularly difficult one to battle. The fact that the Deutsche Bank building was being dismantled floor by floor meant that the building was filled with flammable materials like cardboard. In addition, the standpipe to the building was allegedly not working and firefighters had to pull hoses up from the street using ropes".

http://gothamist.com/2007/08/19/two_firefighter.php
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom