Merged 9/11 No Plane/Energy Weapon discussion thread

[Mudcat]

The fumes coming from WTC 1 would have shown evidence of a plane flight, had one come within a block or two of the fumes, as is claimed by the silly theory.

The fumes were real. The plane? Unproved.

I think I see what the problem here is, so let me break it down for you:

1. Fumes are not visible, what you see drifting up is smoke, which is visible.
2. Wake turbulence isn't visible either, at least not under most but the rarest circumstances.
3. You can't change the laws of physics or aerodynamics so since the planes actually existed and were in flight than the wake turbulence did exist as well.

I truly hope this helps you out.

 

[thedopefishlives]

I think I see what the problem here is, so let me break it down for you:

1. Fumes are not visible, what you see drifting up is smoke, which is visible.
2. Wake turbulence isn't visible either, at least not under most but the rarest circumstances.
3. You can't change the laws of physics or aerodynamics so since the planes actually existed and were in flight than the wake turbulence did exist as well.

I truly hope this helps you out.

It won't. She seems absolutely convinced that the wake should be visible in the smoke simply due to the proximity of the plane to the smoke plume. Those of you who understand the aerodynamics involved know, and have tried to explain to her, that this is not the case, that the plane was not close enough to reveal the existence of the turbulent air stream. She refuses to believe it.

 

[Mudcat]

It won't. She seems absolutely convinced that the wake should be visible in the smoke simply due to the proximity of the plane to the smoke plume. Those of you who understand the aerodynamics involved know, and have tried to explain to her, that this is not the case, that the plane was not close enough to reveal the existence of the turbulent air stream. She refuses to believe it.

I don't care about Dusty, to be honest. As long as you and others appreciate the knowledge we present, that's enough for me.

 

[thedopefishlives]

I don't care about Dusty, to be honest. As long as you and others appreciate the knowledge we present, that's enough for me.

It's the only thing that keeps me coming back to these terrible threads. I love reading what the experts have to say and learning new stuff.

 

[Mudcat]

It's the only thing that keeps me coming back to these terrible threads. I love reading what the experts have to say and learning new stuff.

Wonderful, except I'm not an expert. I'm a student. Of Aviation Maintenance. She has no idea what the hell she's talking about.

 

[swright777]

Note in post #6 that the chairs the computer operators are sitting on appear to be floating above the floor. The only explanation is that they must be holographic projections of chairs.

But then, what's keeping the operators from falling on the floor? The only explanation is that they must be holographic projections of operators.

But, why would the evil boss man shoot holographic projections? The only explanation is that it must be a holographic projection of an evil boss man.

Then the question must be, why is WTC Dust showing us illustrations of holographic projections? Clearly, to deceive us, but why? To what end? How deep does this rabbit hole go?

Or is it just a holographic projection of a rabbit hole?

The keyboard in that same post doesn't have any letters/numbers/symbols on the keys. And some of the keys are either missing or stuck down.

What does it mean?

 

[thedopefishlives]

Wonderful, except I'm not an expert. I'm a student. Of Aviation Maintenance. She has no idea what the hell she's talking about.

Snarky commentary by non-experts is also welcome and often highly entertaining.

 

[twinstead]

Snarky commentary by non-experts is also welcome and often highly entertaining.

Thank GOD. Otherwise I wouldn't be able to post anything on this forum

 

[Mudcat]

Snarky commentary by non-experts is also welcome and often highly entertaining.

No snark was intended, sorry.

But yeah, some experts would know better then me on the subject but all you need to know why Dusty is dead wrong on this subject is Bernoulli's Principle, which is one of the first things I learned about in class.

 

[plague311]

The keyboard in that same post doesn't have any letters/numbers/symbols on the keys. And some of the keys are either missing or stuck down.

What does it mean?

It means she's as good at artistry as she is as a Scientist.

 

[WTC Dust]

That I am correct that there is no clear evidence of a wake at 9:03AM is established.

 

[Horatius]

Horatius' cartoons are better, and make more sense.

It just needs a little tweaking.....

 

[Mudcat]

That I am correct that there is no clear evidence of a wake at 9:03AM is established.

Mind if I ask why do you insist on being wrong about this?

 

[tsig]

Snarky commentary by non-experts is also welcome and often highly entertaining.

A lot of my best snark never gets the submit button due to the MA.

 

[tsig]

That I am correct that there is no clear evidence of a wake at 9:03AM is established.

There was no clear evidence of Godzilla either but you know he was there because destroying cities is his MO.

 

[1337m4n]

It's not nice to make fun of the mentally impaired.

 

[WTC Dust]

Bravo, Horatio. That was great!

 

[plague311]

Bravo, Horatio. That was great!

Horatio was a character, I believe you mean Horatius. I am going to assume this is rather telling about the high bar set for previous reading comprehension?

 

[Horatius]

I have my moments....Some of them unconscious, apparently.

 

[Resume]

That I am correct that there is no clear evidence of a wake at 9:03AM is established.

The evidence is clear, which is why you can't see it.