Merged 9/11 No Plane/Energy Weapon discussion thread

[WTC Dust]

Horatius' cartoons are better, and make more sense.

My story of finding metallic dust in a little nook near Ground Zero is consistent with these cartoons, and I drew them BEFORE I found the dust.

 

[WTC Dust]

Then why did you post 9 images? Can't you even get your own comic strip fantasy right?

Oops. Miscounted. It's 9 images. I had to select them from a big pile of instructive images I've made over the years.

 

[DaveThomasNMSR]

XKCD already nailed it!

I mean, if you are talking cartoon explanations of the tower collapses...

 

[WTC Dust]

Yeah except for the two. Now what is this about the fake planes. Math was never my best subject but two real planes and two simulated fake planes adds up to images of four planes. I still only see the two.

Are you thinking clearly on this subject? Two simulated planes. Zero real planes. Get it right.

 

[WTC Dust]

I mean, if you are talking cartoon explanations of the tower collapses...
[qimg]http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/semicontrolled_demolition.png[/qimg]

There is too much evidence against the explosive theory. Excessive heat played no role in the destruction of the WTC.

 

[Craig4]

Are you thinking clearly on this subject? Two simulated planes. Zero real planes. Get it right.

But there are only two planes in the images.

 

[Macgyver1968]

lol Nope, I'm done. Just 7 images tell the story of controlling a few machines by computer remotely and how the secret could have been kept.

Awww..that's too bad...you could have totally given him a bad ass line like:

"Directed...energy...weapon....the very best there is. When you absolutely, positively need to dustify every mother *********** building on the block...accept no substitute."

 

[Dumb All Over]

How it was really done...

 

[SUSpilot]

Are you thinking clearly on this subject? Two simulated planes. Zero real planes. Get it right.

We have. Two real planes, two towers, two collisions.

Or did someone truck in all those airplane parts?

 

[Craig4]

We have. Two real planes, two towers, two collisions.

Or did someone truck in all those airplane parts?

That's what I can't figure out here. If she's right we have to see four images of planes. Instead we only see the two real images.

 

[Myriad]

Note in post #6 that the chairs the computer operators are sitting on appear to be floating above the floor. The only explanation is that they must be holographic projections of chairs.

But then, what's keeping the operators from falling on the floor? The only explanation is that they must be holographic projections of operators.

But, why would the evil boss man shoot holographic projections? The only explanation is that it must be a holographic projection of an evil boss man.

Then the question must be, why is WTC Dust showing us illustrations of holographic projections? Clearly, to deceive us, but why? To what end? How deep does this rabbit hole go?

Or is it just a holographic projection of a rabbit hole?

 

[TJM]

Are you thinking clearly on this subject? Two simulated planes. Zero real planes. Get it right.

UAL and AA reports they lost no holographic planes, passengers or employees on 9/11. I know, I've asked them.

 

[WTC Dust]

This image depicts the WTC immediately after the attacks looking up from the ground at the south face of WTC 2. No clear evidence of a wake here, either.

 

[LSSBB]

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=217&pictureid=6057[/qimg]

That drawing looks like it was done on the Romney campaign Etch-a-Sketch! The mystery deepens…

 

[Macgyver1968]

I'm waiting for the big face off between Tracy and Jammy. I think it would go something like this:

 

[DGM]

This image depicts the WTC immediately after the attacks looking up from the ground at the south face of WTC 2. No clear evidence of a wake here, either.

Why would there be?


And around we go............................

 

[Craig4]

This image depicts the WTC immediately after the attacks looking up from the ground at the south face of WTC 2. No clear evidence of a wake here, either.

You mean except for the plane in flight producing a wake.

 

[Resume]

Are you thinking clearly on this subject? Two simulated planes. Zero real planes. Get it right.

Have you ever stopped to think why you don't recognize it?

 

[Wolrab]

There is nothing stopping you from conducting an experiment.
Stack 220 pizza boxes into two piles. Separate them to scale. Set one stack on fire at the 96th level. Use an air cannon (or a full, but untied balloon) and blast a "wake" at scale speed and size. See if it disturbs the smoke from the first tower.

Some people here could even offer suggestions on how to properly design the experiment. SCIENCE!

 

[Craig4]

Or you go to Home Depot (or Obi if you're in Europe) and you get a big oval bathtub right. Now you fill it only you use really fine sand instead of water. Sugar will work too but you have to make sure it's totally dry or it will clump and the experiment won't work. Now you pull the plug and the sand will slowly drain out of the tub. You have to film it though and watch in backwards at a very high speed. Watch that and you'll figure it out.