9/11: How they Faked the Videos

[yankee451]

They just went out to Shanksville and set up a smoke machine? And no one saw them hauling it in? They didn't ask for directions or ask for permission before setting up a smoke machine out in the middle of nowhere with only a dirt road for access? Out of all the other spots they could have chosen (like the White House) they decided to put it out in Shanksville just to make it look like the plane didn't reach it's destination even though they've successfully fooled everyone about the other crashes?

As any Halloween aficionado knows, there are hand carried smoke generators available to the general public. I'm sure the Pentagon can do better.

 

[Andy_Ross]

I would like to know how a little stage smoke machine could make so much smoke?

 

[Andy_Ross]

As any Halloween aficionado knows, there are hand carried smoke generators available to the general public. I'm sure the Pentagon can do better.

Can you show us a 'Pentagon' smoke machine?

Warships used to make a lot of smoke but that was done by over fuelling boilers or spraying diesel in to hot exhaust stacks, they stopped doing it when radar was invented..
Armoured vehicles still have smoke dischargers but they use phosphorous grenade launchers. They don't produce smoke that looks like anything burning

 

[carlitos]

Can you show us a 'Pentagon' smoke machine?

Smokescreen at the Pentagon, another topic by the OP, shows what such a machine might be.

 

[Elagabalus]

Smokescreen at the Pentagon, another topic by the OP, shows what such a machine might be.

Thanks for that! Busted Steve! You give us a link to a handheld smoke machine in 2020 but you used a military smoke machine in your own video in 2013.

 

[BStrong]

The op must believe that pulling their shirt over their head and screaming "I can't hear you!" constitutes debate.

On the upside, I believe that we may have found a niche for failed sci-fi writers. -

 

[yankee451]

I would like to know how a little stage smoke machine could make so much smoke?

That huge plume of white smoke?

Follow the smoke plume...

Maybe something like this?

https://youtu.be/o7BGltVipP0

 

[yankee451]

You were confused earlier about the direction of the plane that hit the south tower, I just wanted to get it clear.

If you have shown that the evidence of any video is inconsistent with the damage I haven't seen it.

In fact you refused to respond earlier when I asked you repeatedly which videos you were referring to.

Fascinating. The gyrations. The twists and turns. The obfuscations, the parries, the outright denial. Truly the stuff of legend.

 

[yankee451]

Please respond to the question.

Are you saying that the column could not be damaged unless the cladding is completely severed, including the sides?

You're a shrewd one, aren't you. You figured that out from this image, right?

You've been dancing around explaining how a wing could cut through the steel without severing the cladding for a while now.

 

[yankee451]

The op must believe that pulling their shirt over their head and screaming "I can't hear you!" constitutes debate.

On the upside, I believe that we may have found a niche for failed sci-fi writers. -

When in Rome...

 

[TJM]

That huge plume of white smoke?


[qimg]https://911crashtest.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/inside-crater-2.jpg[/qimg]


Follow the smoke plume...


[qimg]https://911crashtest.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/outside-the-crater-with-arrow.jpg[/qimg]

Maybe something like this?

https://youtu.be/o7BGltVipP0

Those images are from "United 93", the 2006 film, if I'm not mistaken.

 

[Robin]

Fascinating. The gyrations. The twists and turns. The obfuscations, the parries, the outright denial. Truly the stuff of legend.

You are talking about yourself here, right?

 

[Robin]

I am not sure how many ways I could explain it.

I even offered a demonstration.

You are dancing around answering the question about whether you think that the steel column could could not be damaged unless the aluminium cladding were severed completely including the sides.

I have been asking for days, why can't you answer?

 

[yankee451]

I was reminded of Gettysburg when I saw the WTC damage.

 

[yankee451]

I am not sure how many ways I could explain it.

I even offered a demonstration.

You are dancing around answering the question about whether you think that the steel column could could not be damaged unless the aluminium cladding were severed completely including the sides.

I have been asking for days, why can't you answer?

I must have missed it. Indulge me.

 

[Robin]

You're a shrewd one, aren't you. You figured that out from this image, right?

Oh look, you got the direction of travel of the wing wrong again.

 

[Robin]

I must have missed it. Indulge me.

You missed the question? It is right there in the post you quoted.

Why can't you answer it?

 

[yankee451]

Those images are from "United 93", the 2006 film, if I'm not mistaken.

Yes. I was wrong.

I ate crow about it, and other mistakes here: https://911crashtest.org/evidence-that-indicates-the-naudet-lobby-scenes-were-prerecorded/

This is just another in a long string of stupid mistakes that I have made since I began researching this stuff. I once even thought the tree in front of the Pentagon was a blast hole from a missile, and said so on JREF. I included images from the MOVIE about Shanksville in my Shanksville missile video not realizing that they were not the real crater. I once thought the windows on the West side of WTC1 were "tiny" and that the whole wall was reconfigured. I once thought the towers turned to dust in mid-air, that the fires were so intense they melted steel and concrete, etc., etc., ad nausea. You name it, I have researched it and often fallen for it but thankfully I am not in this to be "right," only to find the "truth."

 

[yankee451]

You missed the question? It is right there in the post you quoted.

Why can't you answer it?

I did. I'm waiting for you to explain how the jet wing cut through all the columns, and all the cladding, except for one.

 

[yankee451]

Oh look, you got the direction of travel of the wing wrong again.

It isn't exact, sure. It is simply a representation of how IF a wing could slice through the steel column, it would first have to slice through the aluminum sheeting that covered it.