9/11: How they Faked the Videos

[curious cat]

................. I'm surprised it was damaged as little as it was, considering a 900 lb warhead just blew a big hole in the steel that cladding was covering.

Wouldn't be more accurate to say "The damage is too little to be consistent with the explosion of a 900 lb warhead?"

 

[yankee451]

Wouldn't be more accurate to say "The damage is too little to be consistent with the explosion of a 900 lb warhead?"

"Blew" as in cut through without detonating.

 

[Elagabalus]

I see. So you think the photographs of all the damage evidence was doctored to make it look like the lateral impact of small projectiles, rather than what they were showing on television. Your logic gives me chills.

That's exactly what we wanted you to think, Steve.

 

[curious cat]

"Blew" as in cut through without detonating.

Whatever . But without going in semantics, doesn't "surprises me" mean something like "appears to be inconsistent with..."?

 

[yankee451]

Doesn't matter.

lol

 

[yankee451]

Whatever . But without going in semantics, doesn't "surprises me" mean something like "appears to be inconsistent with..."?

If you bothered to read the thread, or any of the links I provided, you wouldn't be so confused.

 

[curious cat]

If you bothered to read the thread, or any of the links I provided, you wouldn't be so confused.

I don't think reading this thread is the best recipe for treating confusion .

 

[Robin]

Light bits the aluminium sides, dark bit, the hole between.

You can see the window cleaning track leading right up to that hole from underneath, and continuing above.

 

[JSanderO]

Consider the fact that the cladding was applied after the steel panels were in place. I suspect the insulation was part of the cladding AND the joints of the cladding did not align with the steel. This may mean that the alum panel saw some different forces from the steel. Panels could have sprung (out) in some cases not be severed.

But a few odd sections of alum does not render the plane hitting the tower as fantasy... especially in light of the vast amount of what appears to be evidence that a jumbo hit the tower.

There were very few eye witnesses to AA11, but there were tens of thousands to UA175... and it was captured on multiple cameras from many locations.

Steve is tilting at windmills here... and is not and should not be taken seriously.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

Here is the full damage for the tower in question:

[qimg]https://robinsrevision.files.wordpress.com/2020/01/911holesouth.jpg?w=800[/qimg]

Here is a close up of the loose cladding:

[qimg]https://robinsrevision.files.wordpress.com/2020/01/image-4.png?w=567[/qimg]

That's interesting.

In the first photo, the oft-circled piece of cladding is in front of the 5th column along from the wingtip impression. That photo appears to have been taken from a position to the left of the other one, as you can see the west side of the tower.

In the photo yankee451 posted several times also taken from a position to the left, the cladding is further to the right, not covering column 5 at all and closer to column 6.

Did the cladding move? Which photo was taken first, I wonder. Is the cladding perhaps dangling from some connection we can't make out, like a piece of window frame, and gradually slipping?

 

[abaddon]

Wow. So this means the steel wasn't bent sharply in a completely different direction than the mostly hollow aluminum wing was traveling.

The wing was not "mostly hollow". Why must you lie?

 

[Regnad Kcin]

I think this is getting out of hands. I was following with a mild amusement this clowns insulting members of this forum left right and centre, but there is no way to be amused by his outrageous attitude to the victims of this tragedy and their families. If there is a vote to ban him from this forum, you have both my hands up. I am sure such a decision would't cause any grief or damage.

Of course.

But that’s the pathology. Everything must succumb to the ego and its righteousness; that which threatens it must be dismissed, often with extreme prejudice. So take pity.

Then again, it could just be a chain-yanking poe.

 

[Robin]

Wow. So this means the steel wasn't bent sharply in a completely different direction than the mostly hollow aluminum wing was traveling.

Different direction? This is the South Tower we are talking about, right?

 

[Jack by the hedge]

… Then again, it could just be a chain-yanking poe.

My thoughts did turn to whether driving traffic to one's website might be a reason to stoutly defend an absurd claim, but the tiny audience here surely make that explanation implausible.

 

[Crazy Chainsaw]

If you bothered to read the thread, or any of the links I provided, you wouldn't be so confused.

And if you had bothered to note there is a soft rubber portion of the leading edge of
the wing known as a deicing balloon.
If the planes wing was dragged along the edge as physics of impact say it should have been that would account for that observed deformed but left piece of Aluminum.
It's your theory please provide competent Evidence of it.

 

[Oystein]

Yesterday afternoon, while planting bulbs, my son pressed down a bit too hard on the steel bar sticking out of the side of the coring tool he was using to make holes for the bulbs. The 8mm steel bar promptly sheared off, snapping at the base. He was wearing imitation leather boots (he's a vegetarian) with no steel reinforcement. What I need to know is, are his feet harder than steel, or is it the plastic soles of his boots, and if it's the boots, how come he didn't break any toes? I think a more parsimonious explanation is that, as he pressed down on the tool, a cruise missile struck the bar at its base, shearing it off, but he and my wife failed to notice it because they weren't expecting anything like that to happen.

Or, y'know, maybe there's no absolute physical law saying that hard things can only be damaged by harder things. But that's just crazy talk.

Dave

Midgets with saws. I have kept telling y'all for years, but no one pays attention

 

[Blue Mountain]

He's actually studiously avoided answering the question ever since I first asked it way back in post 179.

Hey yankee451, If the aircraft N334AA and N612UA did not hit the WTC towers on September 11, 2001, what happened to the airframes and to the people who were aboard the flights? The people and the aircraft existed at 8:30 AM EST that day, but by 9:30 AM they were no more. What happened to them?

I see, so that means the lightly bent cladding and the gouged and sharply bend steel columns are consistent with the head on impact of a jet. I get it.

I see some words here, but they bear no relation whatsoever to the question I asked.

Please try again.

Are you saying the airframes are myth along with with the people that were in them?

 

[Dave Rogers]

Midgets with saws. I have kept telling y'all for years, but no one pays attention

My son certainly doesn't, so that's probably why he didn't see them.

Dave

 

[GlennB]

More weird mechanics -

I was clearing junk from around the garden and found a thin, pretty rotten piece of wood, maybe 18" long. Propped it against a breeze block, thinking that one good stamp would easily break the wood and I can chuck it in the wood stove.

The breeze block shattered. My foot hurts a little but no great damage done.

Such a thing is clearly impossible, so I reckon I must have taken some reality-altering drugs.

 

[Leftus]

I see. So this changes the evidence of the lateral impact of cruise missiles, how? Perhaps thousands of people did report seeing missiles, but why would the media tell us about it when they were selling us planes? Like all my questions you don't need to answer.

Cruise missiles don't do lateral impacts. They aren't designed that way. They are designed to avoid those very things.

Why do you think that the wing on those missiles, held on by hinges BTW, would hold together better than a wing on an airliner? The wings aren't welded on to survive multiple flights. Missiles are a one shot item. They don't get to be re-used. The hinges are constructed to maintain flight for a few hours, tops.

So were the missiles, which didn't exist, specially constructed, reinforced, programmed by some unknown parties or do you think they were off the shelf?

Do you have any actual working knowledge of the weapon system in question? It doesn't sound like it.