Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread
- Thread starter T.A.M.
- Start date
- Status
Oh I so hope this is real. If this gets published in that journal, it will get descemated, and we will have a copy of the intellectual beating for all to see.
TAM
Mr. Skinny
Alien Cryogenic Engineer
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2001
- Messages
- 7,843
It looks to me like he submitted Bazant's paper for discussion. Either that or it's his own paper with the exact same title.Oh I so hope this is real. If this gets published in that journal, it will get descemated, and we will have a copy of the intellectual beating for all to see.
TAM
It looks to me like he submitted Bazant's paper for discussion. Either that or it's his own paper with the exact same title.
I read it as his reply to Bazant's paper...anyway, we will see I suppose, when the journal edition in question comes out.
TAM
So is your consul responsible for the way CT nuts have been shown to date on MSM? If so you should be fired, they all come off looking like lunatics! Maybe that's what you are going for! Have fun twoofer. We're having a blast laughing our asses off at you!
stateofgrace
Unregistered
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2006
- Messages
- 3,843
It looks to me like he submitted Bazant's paper for discussion. Either that or it's his own paper with the exact same title.
It does read that way doesn't it? And Bill apparently did read it that way.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=138715&page=28
Wonder how many other troofers will read it that way ?
Last edited:
Grizzly Bear
このマスクに&#
- Joined
- May 30, 2008
- Messages
- 7,963
Looks like you and I agree on one thing, however the second part is entirely dependent on what your standard of success means. I have a feeling that our impressions diverge at the point we ask about what will be happening.
Aside from the free public humiliation it serves Gage, I'm far more concerned with the fact that A) allowing this numbskull to peddle incompetent architectural theories will unnecessarily open old wounds, and B) sucker more poor gullibles into thinking Gage is a religious prophet. On the other hand, the millions who have at least a rudimentary understanding of these subjects will see a fine example of what happens when a professional goes coocoo and brandishing his title as the sole reason for his authority and believability. Clunkity clunk!!!
Cl1mh4224rd
Philosopher
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2006
- Messages
- 9,778
I like how bill smith believes that getting something accepted for publication indicates that the journal itself accepts and endorses the conclusions.
Also; I don't really know anything about the ASCE journals, but I get the impression that a "Discussion" (note the capital "d") is quite different from an actual research paper. It sounds like they've merely accepted Heiwa's comments about Bazant's paper.
ETA: From ASCE's Types of Journal Content page:
Is that "5 month period" a hard rule? And when was Heiwa's Discussion submitted? Because Bazant's paper was published in October 2008...
Also; I don't really know anything about the ASCE journals, but I get the impression that a "Discussion" (note the capital "d") is quite different from an actual research paper. It sounds like they've merely accepted Heiwa's comments about Bazant's paper.
ETA: From ASCE's Types of Journal Content page:
Is that "5 month period" a hard rule? And when was Heiwa's Discussion submitted? Because Bazant's paper was published in October 2008...
Last edited:
bill smith
Philosopher
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2009
- Messages
- 8,408
Is there a rush to expose the inside job of 9/11 ?
"Architects know that you can't have 400 structural steel connections failing per second in a fire-induced gravitational collapse," says architect Richard Gage about
the collapse of World Trade Center
7, a building not struck by a plane, on
September 11, 2001. Richard is with Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a group of professionals who have factual reservations about conclusions reached in the 9/11 Report (6/3)
http://www.kgoam810.com/Article.asp?id=1353865&spid=20399 audio
**Richard Gage AIA will also be on Coast To Coast AM Tuesday night June 9th at 11pm PDT.**
"Architects know that you can't have 400 structural steel connections failing per second in a fire-induced gravitational collapse," says architect Richard Gage about
the collapse of World Trade Center
7, a building not struck by a plane, on
September 11, 2001. Richard is with Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a group of professionals who have factual reservations about conclusions reached in the 9/11 Report (6/3)
http://www.kgoam810.com/Article.asp?id=1353865&spid=20399 audio
**Richard Gage AIA will also be on Coast To Coast AM Tuesday night June 9th at 11pm PDT.**
Did he test this by dropping cardboard boxes on each other?
bill smith
Philosopher
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2009
- Messages
- 8,408
Wow...he's really starting to bombard the airwaves isn't he?...Coast-to-coast soon I believe. He's grown immeasuraby in confidence too. It's all good dtugg..it's all good.
Do you think this is all accidental ? Do you think Obama will make an interesting statement soon ? lol
Last edited:
You're joking, right? There is no way that somebody could actually be the way you are in real life. I've had my hopes up that you are for real (for the lulz), but I think I am being overly optimistic.
Bombarding the airwaves? Is that what you call some crappy late night AM talk show (that's what Coast to Coast is)?
And, no there is no way that Obama is going to make any statement regarding the twoof movement. He has real issues to deal with.
Bombarding the airwaves? Is that what you call some crappy late night AM talk show (that's what Coast to Coast is)?
And, no there is no way that Obama is going to make any statement regarding the twoof movement. He has real issues to deal with.
bill smith
Philosopher
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2009
- Messages
- 8,408
TV is a wonderful thing if it is on your side. Gage went down very well in Europe where he had a fairly large attentive audience everywhere he went. Lots of Architects and Engineers attended the lectures and were enlightened.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5652298545742902173&hl=es Mainstream News
BigAl
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2007
- Messages
- 5,397
I wish Gage would bring his traveling circus to Ground Zero. I think his claims would get more mainstream media attention than Gage cold possibly deal with.
Last edited:
Gage is insane and spews moronic ideas on 911. It take a complete lack of knowledge and blind faith based on delusions to believe anything he presents.
You present his moronic presentations and will never present facts, evidence, or engineering principles to support Gage. You are a cheerleader for failed ideas and lies; a terrorist apologist spitting on the graves of those who died on 911 by supporting liars.
twinstead
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2005
- Messages
- 12,374
BigAl
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2007
- Messages
- 5,397
That 2 minute video demonstrates nothing of what you claim.
Bill; How do you know any Architects and Engineers were in attendance anywhere?
If any attended, how do you know that any were "enlightened"?
Last edited:
- Status