Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I am pleased that you assert here that it DID resemble the nose cone of the plane TAM. It gets us off to a positive start.

It resembles a nose cone in the sense that on a low rez, grainy capture from a video, it is "cone like" in shape for a second or two after it (the debris) exits the building.

SO! I have seen clouds that look like dragons....

TAM:)
 
I am pleased that you assert here that it DID resemble the nose cone of the plane TAM. It gets us off to a positive start.
Yet another false positive

satan09-14-01.jpg

www.abqjournal.com 'Face' in the Smoke
 
skepdic.com/apophenia
There is currently a controversial debate concerning whether unusual experiences are symptoms of a mental disorder, if mental disorders are a consequence of such experiences, or if people with mental disorders are especially susceptible to or even looking for these experiences.
Dr. Martina Belz-Merk

Apophenia is the spontaneous perception of connections and meaningfulness of unrelated phenomena. The term was coined by K. Conrad in 1958 (Brugger).
 
Last edited:
It resembles a nose cone in the sense that on a low rez, grainy capture from a video, it is "cone like" in shape for a second or two after it (the debris) exits the building.

SO! I have seen clouds that look like dragons....

TAM:)

Do you accept tht the footage of the plane apparently exiting the bilding is the real authentic FOX footage broadcast on 9/11 ?
 
Do you accept tht the footage of the plane apparently exiting the bilding is the real authentic FOX footage broadcast on 9/11 ?

It has been so long since I looked into any of the CGI/No planer ********, that I would have to plead ignorance on all of it...except that I remember ACE baker coming in here claiming that it was CGIed in.

Sorry

TAM:)
 
It has been so long since I looked into any of the CGI/No planer ********, that I would have to plead ignorance on all of it...except that I remember ACE baker coming in here claiming that it was CGIed in.

Sorry

TAM:)

Don't worry about it. I can confirm that it IS the authentic FOX broadcast footage from 9/11. I remember seeing it myself nd I have checked it out long since. One interesing thing though- FOX have replaced that footage in their 9/11 video archive with footage hat does not contain that sequence. Interesting that they still say that it is their 9/11 broadcast. Why would they DO that I wonder ? Are they worried about something ?
 
Last edited:
Don't worry about it. I can confirm that it IS the authentic FOX broadcast footage from 9/11. I remember seeing it myself nd I have checked it out long since. One interesing thing though- FOX have replaced that footage in their 9/11 video archive with footage hat does not contain that seuence. Interesing that they still say that it is their 9/11 broadcast. Why wold the DO that I wonder ? Are they worried about something ?

link please

TAM:)
 
link please

TAM:)
Somehow the link works now. So now that you have seen it TAM, can you coment on why FOX altered the historical record by editing out essential live footage of what actally happened on 9/11 ? And did you find their banner placement interesting ?
 
Somehow the link works now. So now that you have seen it TAM, can you coment on why FOX altered the historical record by editing out essential live footage of what actally happened on 9/11 ? And did you find their banner placement interesting ?

1. please provide me with the original Fox Link, since you say it is working.
2. What proof do you have that it was changed, besides your word?

TAM:)
 
1. please provide me with the original Fox Link, since you say it is working.
2. What proof do you have that it was changed, besides your word?

TAM:)

The current archive footage that FOX say is the original 9/11 live broadcast can be seen here
http://belowgroundsurface.org/below...ce.org/belowgroundsurface/Living911Part1.html

In this footage at the time of the strike of the second plane the image of the plane going through the building that was broadcast live has been edited out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLKYr5hA6s8&feature=related Original footage

This is part of the immutable historical record essential to historians, researchers and the Truth. It is no less than an alterion of the historical record. You may think it's okay but I think it's a heinous crime.

In this clip from 'september clues' the pertinent seuence removed by FOX is analysed. Maybe you can tell me now why it was removed ? You can also duck and weave if you want. Nobody will notice.

http://www.livevideo.com/video/soci...F798CBB438E6378129/september-clues-part1.aspx Detailed analysis
 
Last edited:
That web link is not to a Fox site.

Where is the original link to the current footage that you say Fox is now showing at their site. "belowgroundsurface.org is not Fox's archive site, is it?

TAM:)
 
That web link is not to a Fox site.

Where is the original link to the current footage that you say Fox is now showing at their site. "belowgroundsurface.org is not Fox's archive site, is it?

TAM:)
There are five or so links on that page each to the 9/11 broadcast of five different networks FOX is the bottom right one. Press the little arrow to the left of where it says 'FOX' and it will load and soon start playing.
 
Last edited:
Yes but why does it have to go through an alternative page.

If I go to Fox news, the local station that had the footage I assume, should I not be able to see what footage they have there for Sept 11th?

Why do I have to view it through an UNRELATED webpage?

TAM:)
 
For the love of god.

I would venture to guess that "Renovations" occurred on an almost continuous basis for the life of the towers. They were 110 storeys x 2 of office space, stores, etc....

TAM

Really? Focused on the columns and the elevator shafts by the same company that supervised the demo of the Kingdome and participated in the clean up at GZ?

Yeah you're right, just another coincidence. You guys could pile up coincidences til they o'ertop old Pelion.
 
Yes but why does it have to go through an alternative page.

If I go to Fox news, the local station that had the footage I assume, should I not be able to see what footage they have there for Sept 11th?

Why do I have to view it through an UNRELATED webpage?

TAM:)

If you don't want to look TAM then just say so. I assume that the belowgrounds site links from the FOX website. For the rest I refer you to the 'duck and weave' section of one of my recent posts.
 
Last edited:
One interesing thing though- FOX have replaced that footage in their 9/11 video archive with footage hat does not contain that sequence. Interesting that they still say that it is their 9/11 broadcast.
Please provide a link to the FOX 9/11 video archive
TYIA :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom