• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

9/11 commission told not to probe too deeply

RedIbis said:
That would be dumb since I already answered that question in post #70.
Click to expand...

No you didn't. My question was asked in post 71.

Then the flaw in this false choice argument was further expressed by Matthew Cline.
Click to expand...

I want to hear your answer.

You are so pathetic Red, it's amazing. You're incapable of forming your own opinions and explaining them in your own words. That strikes me as someone who is:

a) stupid
b) cowardly
c) lazy
d) dishonest

Which one is it? :eusa_think:

Maybe the Commission has been fooled about one of the evidences (let's say the debris- and you still have to explain how they could have been fooled about that), but all of them?

The Commission body of investigation comprises the very people who were there on the scene collecting the evidence. So that means some peoples in the Commission must have tampered with the evidence.
 
Last edited:
Matthew Cline said:
Another explanation is that the Commission was fed false information and they fell for it. Maybe the labs who did the DNA analysis on the tissue samples lied. Maybe someone in the chain of custody from the crash site to the labs tampered with the tissue samples. Maybe someone in the chain of custody of the blood samples from the relatives tampered with that. Maybe someone planted the tissue samples at the crash site, and everyone involved in the chains of custody and the analysis were completely honest.
Click to expand...

Again, it's possible they could have been fooled by one of them, but all of them at the same time?

We're talking about the FDR, the debris, the eyewitnesses, the physical evidence at the scene. Hundreds of people collecting hundreds of samples and testimonies. The Commission would have had to be fed false information about all of them.

And that's just the Pentagon. Red also believes in controlled demolitions and that the crash at Shanskville isn't true. Add that to the rest of things the Commission must have had to be fooled about.

And thanks for answering for Red at his place, maybe next time you should mind your own *********** business and don't answer other peoples' questions. It's hard enough as it is to make Red respond to anything. :mad:
 
Last edited:
Matthew Cline said:
The truth movement isn't monolithic. It's entirely possible that Red doesn't believe the accusations others Truthers level against the Commission.
Click to expand...

Still playing Devil's advocate? It looks like you've found yourself a new career.

Red described his beliefs as being 95% MIHOP, so there is little about the 9/11 TM's claims he doesn't believe in.
 
Last edited:
Matthew Cline said:
The truth movement isn't monolithic. It's entirely possible that Red doesn't believe the accusations others Truthers level against the Commission.
Click to expand...

But he did say no one ever said it and acted like it was a crazy suggestion.
 
Pardalis said:
You are so pathetic Red, it's amazing. You're incapable of forming your own opinions and explaining them in your own words. That strikes me as someone who is:

a) stupid
b) cowardly
c) lazy
d) dishonest

Which one is it?
Click to expand...

False choice fallacy.



It could easily be some combination of the four.
 
tell you what, I'm proud of each and every one of you for resiting the urge to make a joke about something probing too deeply; it took every ounce of my being not to.
 
Pardalis said:
No you didn't. My question was asked in post 71.


I want to hear your answer.

You are so pathetic Red, it's amazing. You're incapable of forming your own opinions and explaining them in your own words. That strikes me as someone who is:

a) stupid
b) cowardly
c) lazy
d) dishonest

Which one is it? :eusa_think:

Maybe the Commission has been fooled about one of the evidences (let's say the debris- and you still have to explain how they could have been fooled about that), but all of them?

The Commission body of investigation comprises the very people who were there on the scene collecting the evidence. So that means some peoples in the Commission must have tampered with the evidence.
Click to expand...

You call me pathetic and someone who is incapable of forming my own opinion yet you continuously harangue me. One would have to question your mental state. You are familiar with the definition of insanity aren't you?
 
RedIbis said:
You call me pathetic and someone who is incapable of forming my own opinion yet you continuously harangue me. One would have to question your mental state. You are familiar with the definition of insanity aren't you?
Click to expand...

Pardalis is one of the sanest people here. Even outside the CT/911CT cesspit.

Now are you going to answer the question or are you incapable of forming an opinion of your own?


...aside from your belief that the firefighters were in on it, that is.
 
Sword_Of_Truth said:
Pardalis is one of the sanest people here. Even outside the CT/911CT cesspit.

Now are you going to answer the question or are you incapable of forming an opinion of your own?


...aside from your belief that the firefighters were in on it, that is.
Click to expand...

You don't want discourse or you'd stop lying.
 
Sword_Of_Truth said:
I've told no lies.

I think you owe me an apology.

But answer Pardalis's question first.
Click to expand...

You said it was my belief that the firefighters were in on it. As usual you have no quote to back up your lie. You are lying. And no I don't even want an apology. I'm just pointing out your shallowminded hypocrisy.
 
I bet RedIbis does believe that the firefighters were in on it. He's just too cowardly to say so.
 
Despite intricate gymnastic rhetorical dances and eye winking, batting eyes "who, ME?" denials , IMO nobody who thinks WTC7 was an 'inside job' can claim the firefighters weren't in on it. It could not have been accomplished without at least some firefighter 'help'.
 
twinstead said:
Despite intricate gymnastic rhetorical dances and eye winking, batting eyes "who, ME?" denials , IMO nobody who thinks WTC7 was an 'inside job' can claim the firefighters weren't in on it. It could not have been accomplished without at least some firefighter 'help'.
Click to expand...

Why? They were evacuated early in the afternoon. I really want to understand this nugget of debunking.
 
RedIbis said:
Why? They were evacuated early in the afternoon. I really want to understand this nugget of debunking.
Click to expand...
Evil fire stepped in and worked all day to bring down WTC7. Fire not fought destroy property. Grade school kids know this; what is the problem with the brain-dead 911 truth cult? Have you seen a more moronic group in your life, failing to understand an event figure out in minutes on 911. 911 truth has to be the biggest failure in history as they make up the dumbest delusions.

What does 911 truth say on this nugget you fail to grasp?
 
RedIbis said:
Why? They were evacuated early in the afternoon. I really want to understand this nugget of debunking.
Click to expand...

How else does it make sense that you, some random guy on the Internet with no relevant expertise whatsoever, can determine the building was blown up for some mysterious reason but professionals who were on the scene haven't come forward with this supposed fact? I suppose this is also possible if if they were a bunch of complete morons. Take your pick.
 
RedIbis said:
You said it was my belief that the firefighters were in on it. As usual you have no quote to back up your lie. You are lying. And no I don't even want an apology. I'm just pointing out your shallowminded hypocrisy.
Click to expand...

You said the higher ups told the firefighters what to think, so the higherups must be in on it and the rest must be stupid to not be able to think for themselves/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom