9/11 commission told not to probe too deeply

[dafydd]

To disagree would be wrong. It's a fact. Not an opinion. Because the general consensus among the people who wrote the report is that it is bull.

It was set-up to fail and obstructed. Those are their words not mine.

So you have not read the report.

 

[Dave Rogers]

The 9/11 commission report was an under-funded, set-up to fail, obstructed investigation. It's sole purpose was to absolve certain people of their failure to protect the American people on 9/11. It is nothing more.

This is a fact not an opinion.

All this post does is establish beyond reasonable doubt that the poster is unable to distunguish between fact and opinion, which seems to me to be a common failing of conspiracy theorists.

Dave

 

[sylvan8798]

The 9/11 commission report was an under-funded, set-up to fail, obstructed investigation. It's sole purpose was to absolve certain people of their failure to protect the American people on 9/11. It is nothing more.

This is a fact not an opinion. Stop living in denial.

Wait a minute. So the sole purpose wasn't to cover up the massive inside jobby job conspiracy involving thousands?

You seem to be claiming they wrote their report in good faith, since you put so much stock in their quotes. If so, how could that be, since all the ct claims are claimed to be utterly obvious to even the least educated internet bumpkin?

 

[Thunder]

9-11 Commission told not to probe too deeply?

Does this mean the Truthers prefer a much more thorough and deeper...probing?

 

[aggle-rithm]

The 9/11 commission report was an under-funded, set-up to fail, obstructed investigation. It's sole purpose was to absolve certain people of their failure to protect the American people on 9/11. It is nothing more.

This is a fact not an opinion. Stop living in denial.

Boy! It's a good thing there were a lot of other investigations and analyses surrounding the events of 9/11. There is more than enough reliable information to come to an informed conclusion about what happened that day.

 

[Thunder]

how many investigations were there done into 9-11?

4? not including the prosecution of Moussoui. I believe.

 

[Sam.I.Am]

FBI, FEMA, SEC, NIST (2), 9/11 Commission and probably a bunch of smaller internal investigations.

 

[Pardalis]

I think it hurts you. The fact is they now know that their investigation was obstructed. Period. That's it. So stop championing that report here. It's bull. If it was a conspiracy or not, or whatever their opinion on it is as far as conspiracy goes, doesn't matter.

You don't see your contradiction?

It doesn't matter to you what they think, but you find that their criticisms are meaningful?

 

[Pardalis]

And I don't think you are that much of a liar dtugg as much as you are just in denial. Get some help.

Keane, on 9/11 2009: "We basically stand by with what's written in that report."

And when he talks about you truther guys, he uses the expression "That's out there".

Now who's in denial?