8 out of 8 at Citgo station

[Childlike Empress]

Quelle surprise. Nothing but posturing.

 

[The Big Dog]

Quelle surprise. Nothing but posturing.

"(@16.5) 15cm left of the old Datsun, 57cm north of the burger package he lost there the day before. Please accept the metric system. Why?"

Quelle surprise. Nothing but posturing.

So, where was Paik when he saw the plane?

 

[Childlike Empress]

#994. Pay attention.

 

[The Big Dog]

#994. Pay attention.

Now we are getting somewhere:

"The whole thrust of the post is based on CIT's placement of Mr Paik. Mr Paik was actually inside the building."

WELL DONE CE! You are correct he WAS in the building.

Now we must deal with CIT's numerous deceptions: the omission of this fact from their various videos, their refusal to release the raw video, their staging of a clearly misleading scene in which they placed Mr. Paik near the sidewalk.

 

[Childlike Empress]

Won't work.

 

[The Big Dog]

Won't work.

Was there something else you were going to add to that sentence?

Like: Now that CIT's deception has been exposed, their other misrepresentations WON'T WORK any longer on even the most weak minded individuals.

 

[Childlike Empress]

Yes, sorry, i thought the omitted sentence was obvious in context, but here it is:

The fact that you are running around screaming, spamming and insulting all through this thread, coupled with general incompetence apparent in your writing, leads to a situation in which further attempts by you at derailing and complicating a very simple issue won't work.

 

[The Big Dog]

Yes, sorry, i thought the omitted sentence was obvious in context, but here it is:

The fact that you are running around screaming, spamming and insulting all through this thread, coupled with general incompetence apparent in your writing, leads to a situation in which further attempts by you at derailing and complicating a very simple issue won't work.

Sigh.... guess we are back to the drawing board, CE.

I ask my simple question:

So, where was Paik when he saw the plane?

and you desperately dodge answering it in ways so OBVIOUS it is absolutely hilarious. CE, I want to take a minute to thank you. I don't believe that anyone could do as much damage to the No Planers at the Pentagon as you have done in this thread.

Thanks.

 

[jhunter1163]

CE:

Why does CIT's line for Paik's view of the flightpath go behind the building he was in?

 

[beachnut]

Yes, sorry, i thought the omitted sentence was obvious in context, but here it is:

The fact that you are running around screaming, spamming and insulting all through this thread, coupled with general incompetence apparent in your writing, leads to a situation in which further attempts by you at derailing and complicating a very simple issue won't work.

In the real world you take your evidence, present it, then with a story like you support, the CIT north of the CITGO and fly over and cover-up on a massive scale, you earn a Pulitzer Prize for exposing the plot, the super duper conspiracy. You and CIT have no evidence so the reality of a Pulitzer is a delusion.

What do you do now? you get upset Paik is pointing to the south flight path.

 

[funk de fino]

later? later don't cut it for the same reasons you cut down CIT. You got nothing.

Yeah right. I'm sure it is. Can they give me an accounting of the plane debris yet? Or do you have an excuse for that too?

Yes, the radar track is there. Go check it.

 

[funk de fino]

Won't work.

Say, CIT fanboy mudlark has just admitted the shadow passed over the shop. He had to cause Shinki said it.

Guess what that means?

For a bonus point what's the difference between paikpointssouth and paikpointsnorth?

 

[funk de fino]

Hit us with da truth.

C130 pilot, eyewitness to that flight dissappearing near the Pentagon at the same time as an explosion. No fly over.

 

[A W Smith]

Say, CIT fanboy mudlark has just admitted the shadow passed over the shop. He had to cause Shinki said it.

Guess what that means?

the shadow
40.8 degrees altitude 124.5 degrees east of north

 

[Thunder]

Hit us with da truth.

um....sorry to burst your bubble..but..

...9-11 Truthers aren't interested in the truth.

 

[beachnut]

Still no linky, madam?

@the goons: Paik was on his property in a position to describe the plane - already on the north side of Columbia Pike -, flying over his garages and the roof of his office. Which contradicts the official data and is only the first step on a journey that takes us to the Pentagon on a path described by around a dozen credible witnesses in the best positions to judge, that anyone with any honesty had enough opportunities to watch in this thread.

The shadow makes this a big lie made up to support delusional flight paths of massive Gs, and the insane claim of a flyover.

 

[Woody-]

Has any of the CIT supporters every answered why they would go through all the claimed nonsense instead of just flying a plane into the building? Even if it was an inside job what is the advantages of the CIT theory over just crashing the plane?

 

[Childlike Empress]

There are several possible explanations but they are all based on speculation, obviously. This thread is about the witness testimony.

 

[beachnut]

Has any of the CIT supporters every answered why they would go through all the claimed nonsense instead of just flying a plane into the building? Even if it was an inside job what is the advantages of the CIT theory over just crashing the plane?

When you are making up idiotic lies why not go crazy.

Their only skills are in making up lies about 911 as they ignore where their own witnesses verify the actual flight path that knocked down lampposts.

 

[BigAl]

There are several possible explanations but they are all based on speculation, obviously. This thread is about the witness testimony.

Then why don't you consider the statements of all the eyewitnesses and put what they say in the context of all the forensic and physical evidence we have.

I know the names of about 200 that saw something at the Pentagon.

I know that the big airplane that all but 8(?) people saw was aimed at the Pentagon.

Nobody saw that plane pass over the Pentagon and leave the area.

I know that the plane and DNA identifying all the passengers was found inside the Pentagon.

I know that about 7,000 people of all sorts worked on the Pentagon site and in the criminal investigation. None of them have blown the whistle on a coverup that killed the friends of some of these people.

Physical evidence trumps inconsistent eyewitness accounts.