Let's investigate this, twinstead.
The blue line is the "real/official" flight path, the yellow lines are the witness testimonies. The yellow line close to bottom left is Edward Paik's testimony according to Craig. Notice the VDOT tower in relation to the blue and the yellow line and how the yellow line crosses the road while the blue one doesn't.
Now we need Paik's testimony to see who is deceptive about it.
Even if I were no a trained aircraft accident investigator with experience in the field with fatal accidents and large aircraft, I would have no problem taking CIT own work and see it supports the blue line. Above we have a two dimensional plot of flight paths. At 483 KIAS at impact, there is no way 77 would be able to do any of the CIT sponsored yellow delusional idiotic flight paths only CIT could be dumb enough to support as reality. Which one is the real one? CE, which one; pick any of them; only one, the blue line is physically possible based on even the witness statements if you would actually listen and analyze what was said.
CIT are the worse investigators of all time. And you like what they do. Who cares, you are allowed to support nut case ideas with zero evidence to back up your claims as CIT witnesses on video point to the Blue flight path. Remember the flight path is up at a 4 to 5 degree impact angle to the Pentagon.
Post 180, I cut the Paik gif to when he stops looking at his finger, I also listened to all of his testimony. Paik points to the Pentagon while he is looking, after Paik stops looking where he is pointing his finger and lets his arm drift to the left while he is not looking, therefore he is no longer pointing to where 77 was, he is looking at CIT dummies who will now twist his testimony to fit their moronic delusion of a fly over never see by anyone, not even Multiple RADAR sites. Paik says 77 came close to the tower behind him, the VDOT tower, the blue line you posted.
I also took the gif from CIT and frame by frame was able to see when Paik stopped aiming with his eyes; I presented the guided finger point; but BCR presented the real as it was seen on 911 single one and only real pointing, making your quibbling a failure.
Paik points from where he was if you listen to the interviews by CIT you would have known BCR, me, and all the world knew Paik was in his office when he saw 77. I knew it, and I knew Paik pointed to the blue flight path which matches the FDR (hard irrefutable evidence), RADAR data (hard irrefutable evidence), and thus makes Paik testimony very interesting as his timing based on his testimony matches the impact sound and give a good estimate for speed. I figured this out years ago, and it was more of an exercise for how to evaluate witness statements.
I have no problem with the witnesses and I have many of the witnesses original 2001 statements which all agree 77 impacted the Pentagon.
165, 180, done; you are wrong and Paik points to the south flight path.
If you listen to all Paik's testimony you would understand why this is Paik pointing where he saw 77 on 911, from where he saw 77 on 911, and if you can do geometry/math/physics this matches the location in relative to Paik that 77 was, in altitude and location, which match the blue line. The reality based flight path.
actual POV and direction of sighting in this image.
