• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

13 victims, ages 2 to 29, kept shackled by parents

William Parcher said:
Underdevelopment doesn't seem to be seen in the photo. Severe malnourishment must have occurred since the photo was taken. That's what I'm saying.
Click to expand...


Please edify us. How could someone at 29 years of age look 14 if their malnourishment caused underdevelopment started in the last 2 years?
 
Craig4 said:
Please edify us. How could someone at 29 years of age look 14 if their malnourishment caused underdevelopment started in the last 2 years?
Click to expand...

I'm still wondering how "underdevelopment" can be observed in one photo.

"That person isn't dying of cancer, here's a photo where they look fine!"
 
William Parcher said:
Underdevelopment doesn't seem to be seen in the photo. Severe malnourishment must have occurred since the photo was taken. That's what I'm saying.
Click to expand...

These parents were pretty good at staging photos that make everything seem normal and happy.
 
Craig4 said:
The "Thing #" t shirts were cringe worthy even without the back story. That was just creepy.
Click to expand...

Those shirts are sold in gift shops at Universal Studios. It's common in and near the park to see groups of kids and adults wearing them, including the sequential numbers.
 
Craig4 said:
Please edify us. How could someone at 29 years of age look 14 if their malnourishment caused underdevelopment started in the last 2 years?
Click to expand...
Exactly

There is a difference between growth being stunted from a certain age and someone regenerating to 15 odd years their age over two years

We don't live in an episode of Dr Who
 
autumn1971 said:
Those shirts are sold in gift shops at Universal Studios. It's common in and near the park to see groups of kids and adults wearing them, including the sequential numbers.
Click to expand...

Shoot, I think we even have Thing 1 and Thing 2. I've seen Thing 3 here and there, but "Thing 13" is pretty cringeworthy, yes.

ETA. At that point, they should be doing Little Cat A - M, instead. And the littlest one should have Little Cat N in her hat
 
Last edited:
TheGoldcountry said:
That was my point. Hurting children crosses political denominations.
Click to expand...

How do you figure.

I could easily see a conservative jury letting them off since they would figure they aren't doing anything they don't do to their own kids when they mouth off and bring liberal lies (like climate change existing) into their home.
 
Travis said:
How do you figure.

I could easily see a conservative jury letting them off since they would figure they aren't doing anything they don't do to their own kids when they mouth off and bring liberal lies (like climate change existing) into their home.
Click to expand...

Lol

Someone thinks anyone who thinks different to them is devil spawn
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom