nist

The A&E truth-seekers are attempting to secure funds to purchase a billboard across the street from the NY Times building ... From September 12, 2001, to the 20th anniversary, the New York Times has led the way in pushing the official story and denigrating those who question it — most...

Seems the dolts are suing NIST :eek: https://www.ae911truth.org/news/760-exposing-nist-s-fraud-in-court-mick-harrison-and-ted-walter-on-9-11-free-fall And they have their own website! http://nisterrors.com/ So does this mean that they are ok with NIST report of WTC 1 and 2? :jaw-dropp :boxedin:

NIST told AE 9/11 Truth to go pound sand. https://www.ae911truth.org/nist Of course they are going to appeal, so donate money now!

seems they are going to submit a “request for correction” to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) regarding its 2008 report on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7...

Collapses: Fire Alone? NIST-reports - decrypted version from which you can copy&paste can be found here: https://onedrive.live.com/?id=23638DA582FECBF6!106&cid=23638DA582FECBF6 (Thanks to MrKoenig from The911Forum.) The short story of the NIST's collapse initiation is that the fire-induced...

Tell NIST where they went wrong! http://www.nist.gov/director/orals.cfm Submission of abstracts close 30 April 2015. Sorry, but "Please do not send supplemental materials (photos, articles, graphs or tables) with your abstract". This applies to AE911T DVDs. ;) What, you don't have a...

This, in my opnion, is a slam dunk. Someone posting as "benthamitemetric" on several forums compiled a massive list of scientific writings (refereed papers, sworn affidavits, reports, ...) that all cite the NIST reports about the WTC7 collapse, and support NIST's conclusions or/and methodology...

Has anyone here discussed a recent article by J.D. Wynham et al written for an ethics forum on the NIST study by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers? Here is the paper: http://www.scientistsfor911truth.org/docs/IEEE_Ethics_Paper_030714.pdf Here is AE911's account of an event...

Here is the letter: http://www.journalof911studies.com/resources/2014JanLetterPepper.pdf Here are two posts about it: http://www.opednews.com/articles/Embarrassing-NIST-They-Le-by-Andrew-Mills-Attack_Engineer_Misconduct_WTC7-140117-254.html...

I know some of you fine folks probably have gone over this more than me. I am NOT a truther. I am DEBUNKING many of them however. Im interested in what NIST said about collpase times. Specifically Im trying desperately to point out the giant fail in truthers claims that the towers (WTC's) fell...

Hey all, in more than a year, I have not been able to download any PDFs from the NIST's pages on WTC. I get endless shows of the hourglass and eventually timeouts. I don't have several parts of the WTC1+2 reports, for example I could not find the part where they tested the behaviour of the...

Gage calling for a "federal grand jury investigation" of the lead NIST investigators "Like Griffin, Gage argues that the three-year-long, $16 million NIST investigation, the work of nearly 100 NIST investigators, staff, and independent experts and consultants, was part of the criminal cover-up...

Conspiracy theorists claim that the 2.5 seconds of "virtually free fall speed" is the definitive proof that explosives caused the collapse of WTC7. According to them, it would only be possible if eight floors of the building suddenly disappeared. I totally disagree. To me it's consistent with...

Chandler continues to not only unwittingly debunk AE911Truth's BS of straight down collapse and ramble incoherently about Newton's 3rd law, but continues in true truther fashion by pulling nonsense out of thin air. "There were explosions in Building 7 heard by many witnesses...One such...

Why do twoofers think fireproofing is used to protect steel structural members in buildings if fire can't destroy a steel building? Seriously, what is the point? Is this some giant scam by contractors to get more money? Perhaps the NWO had been perpetrating the myth that steel buildings need...

This video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe7Td_MrRlA seems to show some kind of audible and visible explosion of the face of the south tower as the molten metal falls from the NW corner. The visual aspect was already being discussed here...

Obviously NIST has nothing to hide: http://911blogger.com/news/2010-07-12/nist-denies-access-wtc-collapse-data Their crackpot physics-violating theory based solely on a computer model cannot have its data publicly scrutinized as it "might jeopardize public safety". Well millions of pitch fork...

Some say that the events of the 9/11 is riddled with inconsistencies, nothing can be further from the truth. On 9/11 we see 3 skyscrapers with tremendously consise behavioural characteristics within the broadest of variables. This is what I see: Three skyscrapers, incredibly variable damage...

user-defined break element. its found in NCSTAR 1-6. i can't find a definition for it. but i got a twoof telling me it means that it means they had to manually input values to make the collapse mechanism work because the computer wouldn;t recreate the collapse.

Hello Skeptics, I'm welcoming any questions, and will pose a few of my own. I hope we can all remain civil. You'll discover I am a rationalist, not a tin-foil hatter; I'd still give odds that Beachnut somehow fits in the word delusional. I trust that our resident 9/11 mod, Lashl, will moderate...

It seems some debunkers on JREF still have misunderstood the WTC7 FEA in LS-Dyna. i hope i can correct that misunderstanding. for example: Most FEA's use indeed Displacement scales, so you are able to see the deformations / displacements. this is mostly needed as the FEA's are used to...

Hi, I wonder how much of the raw data NIST used for calculations and simulations that are available to the public? And how much of it that has been reviewed by peers that had access to it. Does anyone know? We are discussing 911 in another forum (btw, Heiwa continued his "heiwa challenge"...

Back in 2008 the FDNY, Department of Homeland Security, NIST, and a few other major city Fire Departments conducted tests to study the effects of fire under heavy wind conditions. (Article here) Well I completely forgot that the complete studies were released in early 2009 and I haven't seen...

Looks like Waterboy opened up another hydrant of stupid. Clearly, there is no such thing as "Sol-gel nanothermites, [...]often called energetic nanocomposites, metastable intermolecular composites (MICs) or superthermite." And there certainly are no connections between the industry that...

Morning all, Many a truther has expressed contempt for NIST's WTC7 analysis because it relied on sophisticated computer models for fire simulation, possible explosive demolition, and failure analysis. They don't think this type of work represents 'real' things, since the results can be faked...

I've got two questions reg. Chandlers videos on the internet that I can't make out any answers to. First, in this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vz43hcKYBm4&feature=related Chandler claims (at about 7.11) that NIST wont release its computer models. I remember when the NIST WTC1&2...

bofor claimed to have sent this e-mail to some of top engineers at The University of Michigan civil engineering faculty, and found that some don't agree with NIST, but he has refused to post any the reply that states a such. He would now like to figure out some questions that any of us can use...

A new paper by Graeme MacQueen and Tony Szamboti contest NIST's and Bazant's collapse hypothesis, finding that there was no deceleration of the rigid 12 story block when it impacted the rest of the North Tower. http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/TheMissingJolt4.pdf

It is today quite simple to conclude how WTC7 was pulled down on 9/11! According NIST Final report of the WTC7 collapse http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/PDF/NCSTAR%201A.pdf (20 November 2008) pp 47-48 one explanation is: "The probable collapse sequence that caused the global collapse of WTC 7 was...

The final, final, NIST WTC 7 report was released yesterday. Earth shattering news: No changes to the major findings! Another one to bed. Geez guys, what are we going to talk about now? :boxedin: http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/techbeat/tbx2008_1120_wtc7.htm