9/11 Truth - Your chance to school NIST

[Orphia Nay]

Tell NIST where they went wrong!

http://www.nist.gov/director/orals.cfm

Invitation to Submit Scientific Abstracts
The [NIST] Organizing Committee for the “International Symposium on
Forensic Science Error Management”
invites all scientists interested in Forensics to submit abstracts to be considered for presentation at the Inaugural Symposium, July 20-24, 2015. Scientists in academia, government, and industry, practitioners, and others
working in the field of forensics are invited to share their results and experiences.
Each submitted abstract SHOULD be assigned to one of the eight (8) focus areas:
Death Investigation
Crime Scene
Human Factors
Digital Evidence
Legal Factors
Quality Assurance
Laboratory Management
Criminalistics
For theme area details, check the Technical Tracks page.
For examples of errors in forensic science, check the Technical Track Errors page.

As this Symposium is focused on error management, each submitted abstract SHOULD be assigned to one or more of the areas:

Error Detection
Error Mitigation
Error Measurement

Submission of abstracts close 30 April 2015.

Sorry, but "Please do not send supplemental materials (photos, articles, graphs or tables) with your abstract". This applies to AE911T DVDs.

What, you don't have a forensics expert? I'm sure that hasn't stopped you in the past.

 

[ozeco41]

...Sorry, but "Please do not send supplemental materials (photos, articles, graphs or tables) with your abstract". This applies to AE911T DVDs. ...

Surely that would be the best source of errors.

Second choice would be some truther claims posted on this forum.

Then look at OUR record in the three areas they want papers:

Error Detection <<WE are brilliant at detection.

Error Mitigation << We are not very good at mitigating - we have very little impact on truthers AND the way we dispose of trolls by boring them out of their min..mmm - I'll rethink that one.

Error Measurement << We don’t seem to be effective in scaling or discriminating errors either by size or seriousness....

We had better stick to "detection"

 

[Oystein]

We are good at Error Lamentation. Too bad NIST doesn't grade that