• Due to ongoing issues caused by Search, it has been temporarily disabled
  • Please excuse the mess, we're moving the furniture and restructuring the forum categories
  • You may need to edit your signatures.

    When we moved to Xenfora some of the signature options didn't come over. In the old software signatures were limited by a character limit, on Xenfora there are more options and there is a character number and number of lines limit. I've set maximum number of lines to 4 and unlimited characters.

November 2007 Stundie Nominations

Horatius said:
there is a traitorous undertone to "debunking" at this late stage of the process.[/URL]
Click to expand...

"Traitor: One who betrays one's country."
No matter how hard we try, I think many of us are going to struggle to do anything traitorous with regards to 11/9.

Dr Adequate said:
Which is heavier, a pound of feathers or a pound of lead?
Click to expand...

Ah, but pounds of lead are non-migratory.
 
Last edited:
Well, you could tie the feathers to the lead with string. Or maybe the lead could grip the feathers.
 
I think the feathers would weigh less because of air pressure or something. Are the objects in a vacuum so as to negate gravity? ;)

I will pass Twysics yet, goddammit!
 
circular reasoning, inc:
From Christopher7
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=3154908#post3154908
Christopher7 said:
Funk

Do you understand the difference between 'evidence' and 'proof' ?

evidence: sign or proof

Every high rise building building that has ever imploded, before or since 9/11, was a CD.

WTC 7 imploded.
This is a sign this it could have been a CD.
It is therefore evidence of a CD.
Click to expand...
user_offline.gif
 
rwguinn said:
circular reasoning, inc:
From Christopher7
Click to expand...

:boggled:

Also, the WTC towers collapsed.

This is a sign that Godzilla demolished the towers with his tail.

Therefore, this is evidence that Godzilla demolished the towers with his tail.
 
JonnyFive said:
:boggled:

Also, the WTC towers collapsed.

This is a sign that Godzilla demolished the towers with his tail.

Therefore, this is evidence that Godzilla demolished the towers with his tail.
Click to expand...
Well, duh! It's obvious!
 
JonnyFive said:
:boggled:

Also, the WTC towers collapsed.

This is a sign that Godzilla demolished the towers with his tail.

Therefore, this is evidence that Godzilla demolished the towers with his tail.
Click to expand...


Of course. At least, if it happens in Tokyo, because no Japanese high-rise has ever collapsed except due to the action of giant monsters.
 
Last edited:
Belz... said:
Of course. At least, if it happens in Tokyo, because no Japanese high-rise has ever collapsed except due to the action of giant monsters.
Click to expand...

Whereas in the United States it could potentially be due to the actions of King Kong... or possibly King Kongs (side note: Kind Kongs or Kings Kong?).

JimBenArm said:
Well, duh! It's obvious!
Click to expand...

It's tempting to actually engage C7 over that piece of mess, but I've read his threads before and I know he isn't changing his views for anything. He could have a magical time/space machine that lets him see every minute detail of 9/11 and still rail on about how building 7 was a controlled demolition.
 
JonnyFive said:
It's tempting to actually engage C7 over that piece of mess, but I've read his threads before and I know he isn't changing his views for anything. He could have a magical time/space machine that lets him see every minute detail of 9/11 and still rail on about how building 7 was a controlled demolition.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I should have known better, but he got under my skin this morning.
 
JonnyFive said:
Whereas in the United States it could potentially be due to the actions of King Kong... or possibly King Kongs (side note: Kind Kongs or Kings Kong?).
Click to expand...

i dont believe king kong ever destroyed any high rises, despite attacking the WTC directly in the mid-70s, therefore we can safely assume any destruction attributed to king kong is in fact controlled demolition
 
defaultdotxbe said:
i dont believe king kong ever destroyed any high rises, despite attacking the WTC directly in the mid-70s, therefore we can safely assume any destruction attributed to king kong is in fact controlled demolition
Click to expand...

That's true. However, I'm pretty sure you can see King Kong planting charges on the WTC towers if you take some low-res YouTube video, freeze it at an arbitrary point, and run it through a couple random Photoshop filters.

JimBenArm said:
Yeah, I should have known better, but he got under my skin this morning.
Click to expand...

Completely understandable, especially given that he's essentially redefining a simple word to mean what he wants it to. I've gotten into protracted discussions with people who really aren't dealing with a full deck (ChristopherA, for example) and it's hard to disengage sometime.

After all, when debating it would normally be proper to point out errors of definition. However, in C7's world, he is right about everything, and everyone that disagrees is in denial or lying.
 
Belz... said:
You can't have more than one king kong. Otherwise you'd have to have an emperor kong and several governor kongs, or perhaps a number of senator kongs.
Click to expand...

What about having one King Kong for each country? Then they can all get together and have a party every year and wreck up the place.

What about a King Kong and a Prime Minister Kong, along with several Secretary and Undersecretary Kongs? This is to say nothing of the possibility of having a figurehead King Kong along with a President Kong.

I think we need to weigh such possibilities. The future of the world may depend on it.
 
Belz... said:
You can't have more than one king kong. Otherwise you'd have to have an emperor kong and several governor kongs, or perhaps a number of senator kongs.
Click to expand...
i suppsoe you could have a king kong who holds no real political power, and a prime minister kong

JonnyFive said:
What about a King Kong and a Prime Minister Kong
Click to expand...
great (or warped) minds think alike
 
Last edited:
Belz... said:
You can't have more than one king kong. Otherwise you'd have to have an emperor kong and several governor kongs, or perhaps a number of senator kongs.
Click to expand...
No, no, if he's a King, then we're talking about the hierarchy in royalty. Which if I recall correctly goes, from highest to lowest: king, prince, duke, marquis, earl, viscount, baron, schmuck. Not sure about that last one.
 
Corsair 115 said:
No, no, if he's a King, then we're talking about the hierarchy in royalty. Which if I recall correctly goes, from highest to lowest: king, prince, duke, marquis, earl, viscount, baron, schmuck. Not sure about that last one.
Click to expand...

Reminds me so much of this quote from the British series "Chef!":
Let me explain the order of things for you. There's the aristocracy, the upper class, middle class, working class, dumb animals, waiters, creeping things, head lice, people who eat packet soup, and then you.
Click to expand...
 
It has a certain purity to it, it is a typo, but it's on the actual credits of loose change final cut

Dylan Avary said:
Writen by Dylan Avary
Click to expand...
 
I'm just waiting for this quote.

Dylan Avery said:
I will be the first to admit that our film definitely contains spelling errors, it still does contain some dubious claims, and it does come to some conclusions that are not 100% backed up by the facts.
*goes back to staring into space*
Click to expand...
 
Yeah, that would be better - but come on, spelling "written" incorrectly is kind of delicious.

Especially in the credits of a "million dollar" movie...
 
"Buildings don't collapse into their own footprints unless the core is removed"

I found one! I found one!

This one's from the Myspace forums, by a regular Wooist there called YuvbinDuped:



I have a frien that worked for the FBI and was friends with John O'Neil *******! She not only verified my claims but there is another person that is willing to go to prison to tell all. Her name is Sibel Edmonds and if her 9-11 testimony was ever revealed it would blow the lid off of the Bush Administration.

You're a lying motherf*cker too!

Buildings don't collapse into their footprints unless the core is removed....period! Jets DID NOT remove the core strucures! The best that could have been attained would have been assymetrical collapse.

There was molten steel several stories below all three collapsed buildings months later.

You suffer from cognitive dissonance.
Click to expand...

Link: http://forums.myspace.com/t/3567071.aspx?fuseaction=forums.viewthread

Screenshot:

n1112520086_30065119_5919.jpg


 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom