• Due to ongoing issues caused by Search, it has been temporarily disabled
  • Please excuse the mess, we're moving the furniture and restructuring the forum categories
  • You may need to edit your signatures.

    When we moved to Xenfora some of the signature options didn't come over. In the old software signatures were limited by a character limit, on Xenfora there are more options and there is a character number and number of lines limit. I've set maximum number of lines to 4 and unlimited characters.

Boy Scouts and Atheism

Checkmite

Skepticifimisticalationist
Joined
Jun 7, 2002
Messages
29,007
Location
Gulf Coast
The Scout Oath indicates that a scout will "do his (unspecified) duty to God", and the Scout Law dictates that scouts should be reverent (respectful of religious beliefs). Summer camp meals typically begin with a prayer; many religions and denominations have awards for scouts who fulfill certain criteria independent of the Scouting program itself. And of course, that you have some kind of religion - it doesn't matter which (so long as it doesn't involve human sacrifice or anything like that, of course) - is a requirement for membership...though no such question appears on the applications...

So while the BSA isn't exactly a church, it can't be denied that religion plays a bit part, mostly traditional, but extant nonetheless.

This thread is directed toward atheists: Would you like to see atheists accepted in Scouting? Why? Which particular values within the program do you find appealing? If atheists are accepted, what changes do you think the organization should make in order to accomodate atheist members?
 
I had my son enrolled in the cub scouts. I felt very uncomfortable when that Oath was said. I'm atheist, and I figure it doesn't matter if my son is, but it was still weird hearing him say the Oath when we never talked about god before. Was it lying for him to say that and not really mean it?
 
I don't get your question. Do you imply that atheists CANNOT join the Scouts? I have never heard of that, and I think such a rule would be illegal in most western countries.

Or are you asking if atheists refrain from joining because of the religious undertone? In that case, I can answer for myself that it would not and has not make me keep neither myself nor my children away from such organisations. Even a child coming from a non-religious home will not be hurt by a few prayers.

Hans
 
Well Hans, obviously you have not followed some of the debates that has been here. In USA the Boy Scouts will not accept atheists as members there has been a court rule giving them the right to throw such people out (together with gays btw).

i know that sounds silly to any of us living in more civilized countries but unfortunately it is true.:rolleyes:
 
I'm not 100% atheist but i'll like to answer your questions.

Would you like to see atheists accepted in Scouting?

Yes definitely. (They are over here).


Why not?

Which particular values within the program do you find appealing?

The knowledge about living rough, using your hands and helping each other to achieve results (in stark contrast to the Robinson craze theese days).

If atheists are accepted, what changes do you think the organization should make in order to accomodate atheist members?

None over here, in your country they should ajust their attitude rather heavily (but off course you could say that about a large part of your administration and goverment too).:D
 
Ove said:

i know that sounds silly to any of us living in more civilized countries but unfortunately it is true.:rolleyes:

Yeah, its horrible that private organizations get to make their own rules. :rolleyes:
 
MRC_Hans said:
I don't get your question. Do you imply that atheists CANNOT join the Scouts? I have never heard of that, and I think such a rule would be illegal in most western countries.

Or are you asking if atheists refrain from joining because of the religious undertone? In that case, I can answer for myself that it would not and has not make me keep neither myself nor my children away from such organisations. Even a child coming from a non-religious home will not be hurt by a few prayers.

Hans

I did refrain from having my son join the next year. I didn't want people finding out he was atheist, or had atheist parents, and then get ostracized for it. I did fear that he would get kicked out for saying an oath and not meaning it. I'm not sure what the rules are in Canada, but it was a mess that I did want to avoid.

Now my son goes to church with some friends, and at least I know they don't care that I'm atheist. I told my son to make up his own mind.
 
Joshua Korosi said:
This thread is directed toward atheists: Would you like to see atheists accepted in Scouting? Why? Which particular values within the program do you find appealing? If atheists are accepted, what changes do you think the organization should make in order to accomodate atheist members?

I don't think that the Scouts need to necessarily issue a press release saying it's o.k. to be an atheist as long as you adhere to the scouting rules, but it would be nice if they'd do so quitely in practice.

I really hated seeing the Scouts basically saying that your years of effort, your community service and your being a good person doesn't matter one bit. (pop up heads up = 1)
 
Tony said:


Yeah, its horrible that private organizations get to make their own rules. :rolleyes:
Yes, when it involves discrimination, it is horrible. How about a scout movement that did not accept blacks? Or jews?

Hans
 
This thread is directed toward atheists: Would you like to see atheists accepted in Scouting? Why? Which particular values within the program do you find appealing? If atheists are accepted, what changes do you think the organization should make in order to accomodate atheist members?

I would like it if everyone in the world could hold hands and sing songs of love and peace.

I know that isn't going to happen. I will settle for the BSA to be treated like every other private organization, and that it be able to dictate it's own policies regarding membership.

What they do is none of my business, provided that my tax dollar is not used to promote/hinder them.
 
MRC_Hans said:
I don't get your question. Do you imply that atheists CANNOT join the Scouts? I have never heard of that, and I think such a rule would be illegal in most western countries.

Or are you asking if atheists refrain from joining because of the religious undertone? In that case, I can answer for myself that it would not and has not make me keep neither myself nor my children away from such organisations. Even a child coming from a non-religious home will not be hurt by a few prayers.

Hans

Allow me to explain. Although Scouting has always had a religion requirement, it has really been irrelevant up until recently. There have been atheists in the BSA before and there are many now, with some troops supporting atheist members openly; many individual troops have something of an informal religious privacy policy, where beyond the mention of God in the oath, religion is simply not discussed. Indeed, since quite possibly every scout in a particular troop has a different religion, discussions of a religious nature become impractical and problematic, quickly. Discussions in my troop have been limited to "Whatever your religion is or will be, do what needs doing" - such discussions are really the most that can be expected of us. There is no "religion" space on the application form, and our troop does not tend to ask prospectives about their religion.

Lately, some Eagle candidates have been rejected by this or that particular council when it is found out they are atheists; as far as I know there have been 2 such incidents within the last 5 years (there may have been more).

One of the most serious problems that has arisen from this "controversy", along with the distance BSA tries to put between itself and homosexuality (which is a seperate issue not entertained in this thread), is that some people paint Scouts and leaders at the troop level as homophobes or fanatical religious fundamentalists; of course, they're neither, and most troops are simply not involved or informed regarding these issues. But people persist, refusing to patronize car washes (etc) conducted by this or that particular troop, with the justification that "they don't want to support bigotry". Of course, the money individual troops earn from their fund raisers more often than not does not go to National, but stays within the troop itself, to be used for buying new equipment or food for a trip.

While the effect may be intended to cut into individual troops' funding, hoping the same is done to troops nationwide in an effort to eventually show BSA that their policies are unpopular, I can say that it will not be successful. Already, the more "urban" troops (which are more affected by the lack of funding) are being more or less left to wither while their councils emphasize recruitment and support in small-town settings where the people are unlikely to care about whether the Scouts accept atheists or gays, and Scouting is slowly becoming a club for the rich.

With my wandering rant complete, I suppose my questions were pretty straightforward. I don't imagine an atheist kid would have too much trouble listening to an occasional before-meal prayer; likewise, if a scout does not believe in God, pledging an oath to "do one's unspecified duty" to such an entity certainly places no extra burden or expectation upon him. But I expect some may differ with my opinions, so I'm asking them to give theirs.
 

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Tony


Yeah, its horrible that private organizations get to make their own rules.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, when it involves discrimination, it is horrible. How about a scout movement that did not accept blacks? Or jews?

Hans
-----


I think it's possible to abhor a private organization's decisions, yet support their right to make make those decisions. I find it stupid and offensive that the BSA exclude atheists, but I'd be even more uncomfortable with a government or culture that could force them to accept them.
 
MRC_Hans said:
Yes, when it involves discrimination, it is horrible.

Ohh the humanity. :rolleyes:

Gimme a break, you act like people are being murdered in the street.

How about a scout movement that did not accept blacks? Or jews?

I would be against them ideologically, but I would support their right to choose who they want to let into their private organization.
 
I think a big part of the problem lies in the fact that government money goes to support Boy Scout programs. Now, if my money is going to pay for an organization in which my son is not welcome, then I have a problem with it.

United Way, for example, has decided to cut funding for the Boy Scouts because of their discriminitory stance. I know that in my region this has caused some financial problems for some of the troops. Although I do not have much respect for United Way (because of the overhead), I applaud their decision.

I give the Boy Scouts my refundable every other month, but only because I don't want to take the cans in myself. Other than that, I have only contempt for the organization.

One of my friends is bisexual and was denied a job working for the Boy Scouts because of it (by her father, no less, who is some National administrator). She had been working at that job (during the summer) for years, and she was deemed unworthy once she declared herself bisexual.

I don't like them, I tell ya!
 
Joshua Korosi said:
This thread is directed toward atheists:
Cool. :)

Would you like to see atheists accepted in Scouting?
Of course.

Boy scouts is a good program. It's good fun, good recreation, teaches kids special survival skills, its educational. And I dont believe any of this should be restricted because someone holds no relgious beliefs. Belief is belief, not a priveledge. Boyscouts is not a church.

Which particular values within the program do you find appealing?
Socializing, its educational, fun. A whole mess of other things I like about the program.

If atheists are accepted, what changes do you think the organization should make in order to accomodate atheist members?
I dont know everything the organization does in the name of Christianity. But, they should take a more secularistic approach. Before you get all uppity, secularistic approach does not mean "teaching god doesnt exist", it means have religion-neutral code of conduct.
 
Re: Re: Boy Scouts and Atheism

Yahweh said:

I dont know everything the organization does in the name of Christianity. But, they should take a more secularistic approach. Before you get all uppity, secularistic approach does not mean "teaching god doesnt exist", it means have religion-neutral code of conduct.

Ah, but religious people can't bear a religion-neutral code of conduct. Witness their relentless efforts to put references to religion everywhere: schools, money, the grand canyon, courthouses, xmas decorations, moments of silence before you can watch the basketball game.
Anywhere there isn't religion is viewed as a place religion isn't yet, but should be.
Beware replicator. :-)

Filth!
 
When I was a boy, I was in the Cub Scouts. I wasn't religious as a child, but I did subscribe to a sort of non-denominational personal deism.

Kinda your general, all-purpose california beach bum, all religions are equal ways to understand God, type of belief.

Well, my Cub Scout Den was all Mormon. I didn't understand that about it, really. I was introduced to it by my babysitter's kids (are all babysitters Mormon?!!?)

There was the requirement of the oath, that was not a problem, as I did believe in a God.

Even now, as an athiest, I have no problem with a certain amount of cerimonial deism.

But there was a certain.... groupthink... about a den where EVERYONE was Mormon. God wasn't just invoked in the pledge. He was everpresent. And not just anyone's God, it was really the God of Moroni and Brigham Young.

And as among all Christian groups I know, there was a certain amount of prostheletizing. A whole bunch of... "Well Billy, I sure had fun with you today building Pinewood Derby Cars. Say, how about we have MORE fun joining up this Sunday!"

At least then, when I was a boy, Scouting was about getting boys to go to church. And churches ran Scouting as a kind of weekday outreach for recruiting new ones to the faith.

The idea of hooking kids on religion once they are out of site of their parents is really icky to me.

Call me crazy.



Girl Scouts, however is totally secular. Which is good, because I won't have to explain to my daughter why her gay Grandmothers aren't allowed to sell cookies with her.
 
Tony said:


Ohh the humanity. :rolleyes:

Gimme a break, you act like people are being murdered in the street.

How about a scout movement that did not accept blacks? Or jews?

I would be against them ideologically, but I would support their right to choose who they want to let into their private organization.
Oh? So discrimination is OK as long as it is a private enterprise?? Well, let me hear from you when YOu have been discriminated against by a private enterprise.

Anyhow, where I live, discrimination is against the law, no matter who indulges in it.

Edited to add: That is not to say that it does not happen here too ;)

Hans
 
Re: Re: Boy Scouts and Atheism

Yahweh said:

I dont know everything the organization does in the name of Christianity. But, they should take a more secularistic approach. Before you get all uppity, secularistic approach does not mean "teaching god doesnt exist", it means have religion-neutral code of conduct.

Wow, I actually agree with Yahweh. With America's ever multi-cultural society the BSA of America must take a religion neutral position. I am sure there are scouts who are Hindu, Muslim, and Buddhist. They don't seem to have a problem in the BSA.
 
Silicon said:
When I was a boy, I was in the Cub Scouts. I wasn't religious as a child, but I did subscribe to a sort of non-denominational personal deism.

Kinda your general, all-purpose california beach bum, all religions are equal ways to understand God, type of belief.

Well, my Cub Scout Den was all Mormon. I didn't understand that about it, really. I was introduced to it by my babysitter's kids (are all babysitters Mormon?!!?)

There was the requirement of the oath, that was not a problem, as I did believe in a God.

Even now, as an athiest, I have no problem with a certain amount of cerimonial deism.

But there was a certain.... groupthink... about a den where EVERYONE was Mormon. God wasn't just invoked in the pledge. He was everpresent. And not just anyone's God, it was really the God of Moroni and Brigham Young.

And as among all Christian groups I know, there was a certain amount of prostheletizing. A whole bunch of... "Well Billy, I sure had fun with you today building Pinewood Derby Cars. Say, how about we have MORE fun joining up this Sunday!"

At least then, when I was a boy, Scouting was about getting boys to go to church. And churches ran Scouting as a kind of weekday outreach for recruiting new ones to the faith.

The idea of hooking kids on religion once they are out of site of their parents is really icky to me.

Call me crazy.

OK, I call you crazy. :roll:
 
Tony said:
Yeah, its horrible that private organizations get to make their own rules. :rolleyes:
I think it's horrible for discriminatory organizations to get my tax money. And I get pressure at work to contribute to United Way, whick still supports the BSA.
I tell them to take a hike.
 
I think it's utterly detestable that the BSA doesn't accept homosexuals or atheists, but I'm not about to favor legislation that forces them to. The best solution is to boycott the boy scouts and start a scouting organization that doesn't discriminate. If I didn't find camping equally detestable, I'd do it myself. Sleeping outside is gross.
 
I think it's utterly detestable that the BSA doesn't accept homosexuals or atheists, but I'm not about to favor legislation that forces them to.

I'm not either but i wouldn't want my tax money to support a discriminating organisation like that. They can do what they want to FOR THEIR OWN MONEY. If they want public money, use of public facilities, scools etc. they would have to remove the discriminating laws. I mean, what's next? Ku Klux Klan rallies on the scool? Nazi meetings in the Library?

The best solution is to boycott the boy scouts and start a scouting organization that doesn't discriminate. If I didn't find camping equally detestable, I'd do it myself. Sleeping outside is gross.

There is such organisations at least over here. I was a member of one (well still are i think) and did a lot of sleeping out in tents and was on some large camps here in Denmark and in Norway it was really really fun. Also being a non religious organisation we didn't have boy and girl separation so for a teenager it was a great place to discover the facts of life.;)
 
Ove said:


I'm not either but i wouldn't want my tax money to support a discriminating organisation like that. They can do what they want to FOR THEIR OWN MONEY. If they want public money, use of public facilities, scools etc. they would have to remove the discriminating laws. I mean, what's next? Ku Klux Klan rallies on the scool? Nazi meetings in the Library?


Why shouldnt the KKK and simular groups be allowed to use public spaces?

According to the constitution, they have just as much right to be there as you or I. Free speech extends to all voices, no matter how racist or disciminatory.
 
Lothian said:
Providing they are not committing a crime (incitement to cause racial violence ?)

That falls under freedom of speech.

The point is that any discriminatory organisation should not in my opinion receive public funding, even if it is the MCC.

MCC?
 
Why shouldnt the KKK and simular groups be allowed to use public spaces?

Not if those public spaces are paid for and maintained with tax money.

According to the constitution, they have just as much right to be there as you or I. Free speech extends to all voices, no matter how racist or disciminatory.

True but you (IMHO) have to do so for your own money. Public funding should not be used to support any form of discrimination.
 
Ove said:


Not if those public spaces are paid for and maintained with tax money.

That doesnt answer the question, Why shouldnt the KKK and similar groups be allow to use public spaces? Free speech is free speech.
 
Hey you ^#&&$# goshdarned $&@(#&@ ***beeeep****

Can hardly be called free speech. Plotting to harm others can land you in jail. Providing a public place for this to happen is unethical, especially if tax money is used.
 
I've been involved with Canadian Scouting for the last 12 years (since I was a Beaver at age 5). Luckily, I was enrolled in one of the more secular groups in my city. Rather than meeting in a church like some other groups, we met in my elementry school gym. A few years ago when I applied for my Chief Scout's Award(similar to Eagle Scout), I had all the requirements done except for one, and that was to have a Religion in Life Emblem .(this could be attained by fulfilling certain requirements set by the religion I would have been in). All the leaders knew I was atheist, but also knew I had worked for the past 3 years on getting my chief scout, so instead I wrote a report on some of the major religions and their effects on world relationships.

Scouts Canada has not made any announcements regarding atheism, it appears that they are just trying to sweep the issue out and let the individual groups deal with it
 
That doesnt answer the question, Why shouldnt the KKK and similar groups be allow to use public spaces? Free speech is free speech.

No it isn't ......there is such a thing as responsibility, but i'm not talking about banning them from appearing in public as you seem to imply, i'm talking about banning them from borrowing classrooms in the evening to hold meetings, or having club houses funded by tax money (as many boy scouts have).
 
Ove said:

but i'm not talking about banning them from appearing in public as you seem to imply, i'm talking about banning them from borrowing classrooms in the evening to hold meetings, or having club houses funded by tax money (as many boy scouts have).

So why should they be allowed to use a public space (such as a square or the front of a goverment building), but not a school?
 
Eos of the Eons said:
Hey you ^#&&$# goshdarned $&@(#&@ ***beeeep****

Can hardly be called free speech.

Then how come you were just allowed to type it?

Plotting to harm others can land you in jail. Providing a public place for this to happen is unethical, especially if tax money is used.

You would have to provide evidence that they were plotting to harm others. Innocent until proven guilty.
 
So why should they be allowed to use a public space (such as a square or the front of a goverment building), but not a school?

Sorry but this discussion is turning silly. You obviously don't understand my point of wiew, fine, let's keep it there. I could try to explain to you that in a scool they would be taking up space that could be used by sensible organisations and they would use power, -janitor time,- cleaning etc. but .................
 
Ove said:


Sorry but this discussion is turning silly. You obviously don't understand my point of wiew, fine, let's keep it there. I could try to explain to you that in a scool they would be taking up space that could be used by sensible organisations and they would use power, -janitor time,- cleaning etc. but .................


That was an honest question.
 
Ok, i'll give an honest answer. I don't like those people but i respect their right to existas long as they don't cause any harm. Over here scools are widely used by a lot of organisations in the evening for adult education - practising music - meetings of various organisations etc. Under some laws you can apply for the use of such localities, one of the orchestra's i play in borrow the music room on a scool for practice f.inst. All our scools are widely used to that in the evenings.

All this is paid for by tax money, the rooms are maintained - cleaned - etc and organisations can borrow them for free. Organisations like KKK or Neo Nazi's or such cannot because of the nature of their doings and it suits me fine to know that my tax money is not used to support such guys.

When you say public places such as town squares etc. it is different because they don't demand any extra care/electricity/cleaning for them to hold their rallies so it is cost free. That is the distinction i make.

In short: They may have whatever opinions they like as long as they don't use public money to distribute those ideas.
 
Tony said:


Then how come you were just allowed to type it?

Plotting to harm others can land you in jail. Providing a public place for this to happen is unethical, especially if tax money is used.

You would have to provide evidence that they were plotting to harm others. Innocent until proven guilty.


I didn't type it, those aren't actual words. I don't want to get banned! That's my point. Don't you ever get it?
Yeah, if you're caught plotting against others, it can land you in jail. That's my point too. So allowing that horse manure to go on in those places like schools is ridiculous.

They can keep their crap opinions to themselves if they can't afford to group together anywhere else. They can always go on the Net. I've seen lots of that, and I don't have to pay for it. I can also post my opinions on their forums. I hardly will go to a gathering of them in a school gym and tell them what I think. Can we say marked for death?
 
Back
Top Bottom