• Due to ongoing issues caused by Search, it has been temporarily disabled
  • Please excuse the mess, we're moving the furniture and restructuring the forum categories
  • You may need to edit your signatures.

    When we moved to Xenfora some of the signature options didn't come over. In the old software signatures were limited by a character limit, on Xenfora there are more options and there is a character number and number of lines limit. I've set maximum number of lines to 4 and unlimited characters.

A Modest Fundraising Idea For JREF

Is this possible?

  • It is illegal

    Votes: 16 80.0%

  • It won't work in any event

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • It might work "off shore"

    Votes: 2 10.0%

  • It's already been tried

    Votes: 2 10.0%
  • Total voters
    20

Richard Kirschman

New Blood
R
Joined
Dec 14, 2010
Messages
2
This is a plan to find, recognize and financially support people who have psychic powers. The greater the power, the greater the financial support they will receive.

After making a registration fee of say $10, psychics will be asked to identify in advance, a series of 5 or more 2 digit numbers that will be generated at random. If the psychic correctly predicts say 3 of the 5 numbers he/she will be awarded a financial support recognition of X dollars. If the psychics powers are great enough to predict 4 or 5 of the numbers the financial support will be significantly greater. That seems only fair.

If enough psychics are drawn to this plan one might repeat this search, perhaps on a daily basis if needed. There should, of course, be no limit to the number of times one can asked to be tested.

If this was sponsored by a non profit tax exempt organization with a long history of searching for people with psychic powers, it is arguably not a lottery if that's what you may be thinking.

And there is probably no shortage of experienced online organizations who, for a fee, will administer such important, and likely self funding research.
 
I like the fact that "This is a great idea" isn't even a choice in the poll.
 
Not much different from the MDC bar the size. So is the MDC an illegal lottery?

Similar things
1. Both cost money to enter. The MDC has its costs paid for by the applicant
2. There is a prize for winning.
3. Both are claimed to be of skill not chance.
4. Both can be won by luck alone.
 
rjh01 said:
Not much different from the MDC bar the size. So is the MDC an illegal lottery?

Similar things
1. Both cost money to enter. The MDC has its costs paid for by the applicant
2. There is a prize for winning.
3. Both are claimed to be of skill not chance.
4. Both can be won by luck alone.
Click to expand...

Good luck convincing the judge with that argument.
 
rjh01 said:
Not much different from the MDC bar the size. So is the MDC an illegal lottery?

Similar things
1. Both cost money to enter. The MDC has its costs paid for by the applicant
2. There is a prize for winning.
3. Both are claimed to be of skill not chance.
4. Both can be won by luck alone.
Click to expand...

No money is paid to the JREF, which is essential for it to be called gambling. Incurring expenses is not an element in gambling. Paying money to the contest holder who in turn uses that for prize money is.

If it smells like gambling, it's gambling. Many years ago pinball machines were considered gambling because people could redeem their "free games" for cash even though "skill" is an element of pinball. Simply put, there's no way the proposal would pass muster as not being gambling, and in no way would the MDC be considered gambling.
 
Richard, porn raises money faster, and more effectively, and legally.

Suggest you pursue something along those lines.
 
Loss Leader said:
It's against the law. Which law? Just about all of them.
Click to expand...

Well, coming from outside the US it wouldn't be against the law here, as long as it was properly licensed or whatever you need to set up a lottery. However, it doesn't need to be illegal to be a stupid idea. The fact that it's possible to make money by running a particular business, like gambling, does not mean that it's a sensible way for a small non-profit organisation to raise money. It makes just as much sense to suggest the JREF start up a cheese manufacturing conglomerate to raise money.
 
Cuddles said:
Well, coming from outside the US it wouldn't be against the law here, as long as it was properly licensed or whatever you need to set up a lottery. However, it doesn't need to be illegal to be a stupid idea. The fact that it's possible to make money by running a particular business, like gambling, does not mean that it's a sensible way for a small non-profit organisation to raise money. It makes just as much sense to suggest the JREF start up a cheese manufacturing conglomerate to raise money.
Click to expand...

Good point.
 
It would make much more sense to start a JREF bacon manufacturing conglomerate. Just think of how much we could make off our own members!
 
Richard Kirschman said:
After making a registration fee of say $10, psychics will be asked to identify in advance, a series of 5 or more 2 digit numbers that will be generated at random. If the psychic correctly predicts say 3 of the 5 numbers he/she will be awarded a financial support recognition of X dollars. If the psychics powers are great enough to predict 4 or 5 of the numbers the financial support will be significantly greater. That seems only fair.
Click to expand...

There is already a scheme like this in place. It is called LOTTO.

(I don't see too many "psychics" getting funding from it though).
 
What we need to do is restrict JREF membership to only the most select individuals, and then charge $40.00 for the application fee and $25.00 for the membership certificate. Figure 67,000,000 people apply, 13,000,000 are admitted and 45% opt for the certificate, that's $2,826,250,000.00. And that starts to be some serious change.
 
There was a touch of humor intended in my suggestion about a fund raiser disguised
as a psychic test. Not the first time I've failed in this regard.

If it had actually reached a court of law, we might have presented some judge an opportunity to comment on the existence of psychic powers as well as disguised lotteries. Oh well.

Richard
 
Richard Kirschman said:
If it had actually reached a court of law, we might have presented some judge an opportunity to comment on the existence of psychic powers as well as disguised lotteries. Oh well.
Click to expand...


Unfortunately, the court it would have reached would have been a criminal one.

The jurisprudence on disguised lotteries is rather extensive. I doubt there's anything that can be said on the issue that hasn't already been sorted out decades ago.
 
Richard Kirschman said:
This is a plan to find, recognize and financially support people who have psychic powers. The greater the power, the greater the financial support they will receive.

.
Click to expand...

This, [people who have psychic powers], is your actual problem. How can you support something that is non-existant?

No one has even come close to passing real/scientifically / statistics based tests on ANY psychic power (even, heaven(joke) forbid making someone pee with mental powers [psychic squeeze on the old bladder]).

There is nothing to collect for, no reason to believe such will show up. Give us an actual psychic/related to work with and fly this again - until then, makes no sense - been run up the flagpole and got no salutes.
 
Richard Kirschman said:
There was a touch of humor intended in my suggestion about a fund raiser disguised
as a psychic test. Not the first time I've failed in this regard.

If it had actually reached a court of law, we might have presented some judge an opportunity to comment on the existence of psychic powers as well as disguised lotteries. Oh well.

Richard
Click to expand...

Thanks for coming back and making another post. How about visiting us frequently? You can contribute to any other thread that is interesting to you. If you want to talk about yourself feel free to do so here http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=64023
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom