• Due to ongoing issues caused by Search, it has been temporarily disabled
  • Please excuse the mess, we're moving the furniture and restructuring the forum categories

[Merged] 2024 Election Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Republicans have never been better for the financial situtation of the voter. It was always fear that got them elected.

Economic growth? Going back to Franklin Roosevelt, the four presidents who logged the biggest growth in gross domestic product
were, in declining order, the Democrats Roosevelt, Kennedy, Johnson, and Clinton, according to a February New York Times infographic by David Leonhardt and Yaryna Serkez. Three of the four presidents who logged the smallest GDP growth were Republicans. (The exception was Harry Truman. The other three were George Bush père et fils and, in last place, Donald Trump.)

Job creation? The six presidents with the fastest job-growth rate (per Leonhardt and Serkez) were the Democrats Roosevelt, Johnson, Carter, Truman, Kennedy, and Clinton. The four presidents who
logged the slowest job-growth rate were all Republicans (Eisenhower; the two Bushes; and, again in last place, Trump, the only president in the past nine decades to lose more jobs than he created).

The deficit? Democrats are spendthrifts, right? Wrong. President Ronald Reagan inherited from Jimmy Carter a deficit of $78.9 billion, according to Politifact. When he left office, it was $152.6 billion. When his successor, President George H.W. Bush, left office, it was $255 billion.
Click to expand...

https://newrepublic.com/article/166274/economy-record-republicans-vs-democrats
 
Tero said:
Republicans have never been better for the financial situtation of the voter. It was always fear that got them elected.



https://newrepublic.com/article/166274/economy-record-republicans-vs-democrats
Click to expand...

Laughable attempt at analysis. I particularly was amused at this:

To be fair, the Obama increase in median household income continued under Trump. But on an inflation-adjusted basis, it started falling about halfway through Trump’s final year in office.
Click to expand...

Hmmm, about halfway through Trump's final year in office? Was there something else happening at that time? Ditto with the employment comparison.
 
Let’s Stop Treating Polls as Actual News Events

polls.... become news events unto themselves, generating reams of coverage and endless commentary. They’re not actually breaking news events, like, say, a train derailment, even if treated as such. They’re more creations of a media industrial complex that longs for easy data points, for things that feel like facts but are actually imprecise measuring mechanisms.
“But they’re also subject to a lot of measurement error,” Morris continued. “Only about one out of every 100 people a pollster calls picks up the phone. Those respondents can be really weird, politically speaking, and are also prone to overreacting to the news cycle. This means we need to be even more careful when reading into a single poll’s results.”
Click to expand...

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/11/2024-election-polls-donald-trump-joe-biden
 
Brainster said:
Hmmm, about halfway through Trump's final year in office? Was there something else happening at that time? Ditto with the employment comparison.
Click to expand...

That was when he finally unveiled his plan to fix the healthcare system. Or was that two weeks later.
 
Brainster said:
Laughable attempt at analysis. I particularly was amused at this:



Hmmm, about halfway through Trump's final year in office? Was there something else happening at that time? Ditto with the employment comparison.
Click to expand...

I remember how, just before Trump's inauguration, the US economy was in shambles, unemployed through the roof, deficit skyrocketing - but all that change the moment trump was sworn in ...
At least, that was what right-wing outlets and Trump told us.

What DID happen under Trump is indeed an explosion of the deficit, despite running on a platform to eliminate not just the deficit, but the entire debt.

Not sure if "amusing" is the term for people who keep on supporting someone like this.
 
i was looking forward to doing my taxes on a postcard. all i got was cuts that already expired. but i think that was after the healthcare plan and infrastructure week. must have ran out of sharpie.
 
Brainster said:
Laughable attempt at analysis. I particularly was amused at this:



Hmmm, about halfway through Trump's final year in office? Was there something else happening at that time? Ditto with the employment comparison.
Click to expand...

I had a relative over visiting in 2018 who was a supporter of T****y. He openly admitted that T****y was bad for the country and that he only supported T****y because the tax cuts were good for his investments.

Pity you can't display thehonesty of my cousin, scrote that he is.
 
Reminder that Trump won 3 states by less thatn 1% and that the 2024 election is likely to be the same, one way or another. Except Trump 2024 is not Trump 2016. he has got more repetitive and annoying. For rallies the stand up material is the same, just new targets for his hate, judeges.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/202...tm_source=tw&utm_campaign=intel&utm_medium=s1

And a third theory: Biden’s bad numbers will get better — voters aren’t even paying much attention yet, and as the campaign gears up, the president will bounce back.
Click to expand...
 
I got sent this by an American friend this weekend. Its a bit politically whimsical, but its overall sentiment is valid...

A DAY IN THE LIFE OF JOE CONSERVATIVE

Joe gets up for work and fills his kettle with water to prepare his morning tea. The water is clean and safe because some tree-hugger fought for minimum water-quality standards.

With his first swig, he takes his daily medication. His medicine is safe to take, because some stupid commie fought to ensure their safety, and that they work as advertised.

He prepares his bacon and eggs. Joe's bacon is safe to eat because some libtard fought for laws to regulate the meatpacking industry.

In his morning shower, Joe reaches for the shampoo. His bottle is labelled with each ingredient because some hippie crybaby fought for his right to know what he was putting on his body and how much it contained.

Joe dresses, walks outside and takes a deep breath. The air he breathes is clean because some environmentalist whackjob fought for laws to stop industries from polluting our air.

Joe drives to work in his car. Its safe to drive because some meddling do-gooders fought for more safety features and standards.

Joe begins his workday. He has a good job with excellent pay, pension, paternity leave, paid holidays and sick pay because some union layabouts fought for these working standards.

Joe injures himself at work and has to go to hospital. He receives treatment fully paid for by his affiliated insurance provider because some radical left-wing liberals created the Affordable Care Act.

Joe gets home and relaxes as he watches Fox News on TV. The hosts never mention that the Conservatives have fought against and voted against every protection and benefit Joe enjoyed throughout his day, and they remind everyone that socialists are dangerous and are destroying the country.

Joe agrees: "We don't need those big-government socialists ruining our lives! After all, I'm a self-made man who believes everyone should take care of themselves, just like I have."

Joe finds it wonderful to live in such blissful ignorance?​
 
smartcooky said:
I got sent this by an American friend this weekend. Its a bit politically whimsical, but its overall sentiment is valid...

A DAY IN THE LIFE OF JOE CONSERVATIVE

Joe gets up for work and fills his kettle with water to prepare his morning tea. The water is clean and safe because some tree-hugger fought for minimum water-quality standards.

With his first swig, he takes his daily medication. His medicine is safe to take, because some stupid commie fought to ensure their safety, and that they work as advertised.

He prepares his bacon and eggs. Joe's bacon is safe to eat because some libtard fought for laws to regulate the meatpacking industry.

In his morning shower, Joe reaches for the shampoo. His bottle is labelled with each ingredient because some hippie crybaby fought for his right to know what he was putting on his body and how much it contained.

Joe dresses, walks outside and takes a deep breath. The air he breathes is clean because some environmentalist whackjob fought for laws to stop industries from polluting our air.

Joe drives to work in his car. Its safe to drive because some meddling do-gooders fought for more safety features and standards.

Joe begins his workday. He has a good job with excellent pay, pension, paternity leave, paid holidays and sick pay because some union layabouts fought for these working standards.

Joe injures himself at work and has to go to hospital. He receives treatment fully paid for by his affiliated insurance provider because some radical left-wing liberals created the Affordable Care Act.

Joe gets home and relaxes as he watches Fox News on TV. The hosts never mention that the Conservatives have fought against and voted against every protection and benefit Joe enjoyed throughout his day, and they remind everyone that socialists are dangerous and are destroying the country.

Joe agrees: "We don't need those big-government socialists ruining our lives! After all, I'm a self-made man who believes everyone should take care of themselves, just like I have."

Joe finds it wonderful to live in such blissful ignorance?​
Click to expand...

Joe gets shot and killed when he steps outside to get his mail by a right-wing nut job using his God-given right to own an AR 15 because the GOP is in the pocket of the NRA and gun manufacturers.
 
Would be ethical to vote in the Republican primary for Nikki Haley?
Or would that create a whole bunch of unintended consequences?

Just seems like there's no right answer.
 
Solitaire said:
Would be ethical to vote in the Republican primary for Nikki Haley?
Or would that create a whole bunch of unintended consequences?

Just seems like there's no right answer.
Click to expand...

If you live in a state where you are allowed to, why not?

Assuming that the Democratic primary is locked up by Biden, voting for or against Biden in the primary probably won't make any difference. If that's the case, the primary where your vote might actually matter would be the Republican primary.
 
Er, Joe's insurance does need to pay for the work injury. The employer thru Worker's Compensation (very old communism) pays for that.
 
Last edited:
Puppycow said:
If you live in a state where you are allowed to, why not?

Assuming that the Democratic primary is locked up by Biden, voting for or
against Biden in the primary probably won't make any difference. If that's
the case, the primary where your vote might actually matter would be the
Republican primary.
Click to expand...


The opposition also has a vote and they can respond in kind by voting
for Dean Philips. You could get into a voting war between the two parties
and both Biden and Trump didn't get the nomination. Now you've entered
Donald Rumsfeld risky game of two unknownable knowns. Anythings possible.
Suppose Philips doesn't know anything about foreign relations and gets into
a nuclear war with China?


Oh, dear.

It appears someone else has the same curiosity with dark powers that I do...
But not the wisdom to choose the devils he knows over the devils he doesn't.


Top Democratic donor gives $250k to support Nikki Haley


Reid Hoffman, the co-founder of LinkedIn and a prominent Democrat
donor, says he has donated to a super PAC supporting Republican presidential
contender Nikki Haley because the ongoing GOP primary fight represents
the first of just two opportunities to stop Donald Trump from winning the
White House again.

In a post on LinkedIn, Hoffman said he will “enthusiastically vote”
for President Joe Biden next November, but he noted his “first priority
is American democracy and the integrity of our legal system. That means
my first priority is to defeat Trump, and the primary is the first of two
chances to do so,” he added.

...

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon recently encouraged Democrats to back
Haley – a sentiment Hoffman said he supports. “Those of us who believe in
America must link arms to block Donald Trump from regaining the White
House,” Hoffman said in his post. “America needs both major parties to
nominate sane people who will honor their oath of office.”
Click to expand...
 
Dean Phillips doesn’t worry me. He won’t win but he would be fine even if he did somehow.

And trump supporters wouldn’t cross over to vote for him anyway because that would mean not being able to vote for trump. I can’t think of any reason not to vote for Haley if you can legally do it.
 
Last edited:
It's somewhat interesting that the Democrats now try to promote the few Republicans who are (relatively) sane. Christie, Haley, Romney and Cheney. Of course, all of them have a history of sucking up to Trump at some point or another and are now on some kind of redemption arc. Republicans (or Trump anyway) tend to try to promote those Democrats who seem most insane, from Marianne Williamson, RFK Jr, or those who would likely have no chance as far as they can tell - Bernie Sanders.

That said there probably was a time when Democrats tried the same trick and the world ended up with Trump.

I tend to think this is a realization that the Republicans know the crazier Democrats have no appeal, but Democrats know that the Republican base will go wild for the most insane choices in the GOP.
 
I see this morning the Beeb is gearing up for the election today, seeking opinions on what logo they should use for their coverage.

Under 12 months to go - it should be a lock that Biden wins, but I'm not seeing that at all.
 
The Atheist said:
Under 12 months to go - it should be a lock that Biden wins, but I'm not seeing that at all.
Click to expand...
We could still avoid Orange Hitler if one of them dies or is otherwise eliminated from the election, such as by conviction for a coup attempt. But presuming both stay in it, there are still things Biden could do.

An ad campaign simply playing Trump's own Hitleresque words would help. Not just saying he's like that; Democrats have been saying that about all Republicans at least since 1990 and people are used to the fact that it's always been lies before now. Also no "Let's be positive & hopeful" crap because nobody's buying it anymore. When there's only one thing you're really offering and one possible reason to vote for you, that one thing (not being Orange Hitler) needs to be what you keep reminding people of.

But more important than any ad campaign would be just doing his current job better. He was more popular when he was doing things people liked or even just putting in a token act of even feebly sort-of trying. But he hasn't done much of anything for a while, at least not things people like. His sinking popularity at the same time has not been a coincidence.
 
What would help is if the Dem Super PACs would start campaigning. Why when I look at my phone am I not bombarded by social media ad blitz after ad blitz going negative on Trump? The Dems are engaged in political malpractice.
 
Craig4 said:
What would help is if the Dem Super PACs would start campaigning. Why when I look at my phone am I not bombarded by social media ad blitz after ad blitz going negative on Trump?
Click to expand...
I have no adblocker on my phone, so I've been getting Biden ads before YouTube videos there for a month or two. I finally saw the first Trump one a few days ago. I have an adblocker on my computer, so I've seen neither there. (YouTube just started blocking people with adblockers again yesterday.)

One could argue that that's the wrong place to put ads (although I hear YT is pretty popular and lots of people use it with phones and most phones don't have adblockers), but, aside from that, the fact that I've seen it more from Biden than from Trump might not necessarily be a good sign anyway, because the Biden ad is just Biden talking & asking for help. Biden ads should be showing & playing Trump.
 
Delvo said:
We could still avoid Orange Hitler if one of them dies or is otherwise eliminated from the election, such as by conviction for a coup attempt. But presuming both stay in it, there are still things Biden could do.



An ad campaign simply playing Trump's own Hitleresque words would help. Not just saying he's like that; Democrats have been saying that about all Republicans at least since 1990 and people are used to the fact that it's always been lies before now. Also no "Let's be positive & hopeful" crap because nobody's buying it anymore. When there's only one thing you're really offering and one possible reason to vote for you, that one thing (not being Orange Hitler) needs to be what you keep reminding people of.



But more important than any ad campaign would be just doing his current job better. He was more popular when he was doing things people liked or even just putting in a token act of even feebly sort-of trying. But he hasn't done much of anything for a while, at least not things people like. His sinking popularity at the same time has not been a coincidence.
Click to expand...
All the adverts should be about Trump being a loser, how he was already beaten by Biden. It will drive Trump insane.
 
Polls don't work. A poll a month ago and a poll a month from now are equally bad. CNN is just "making news" as they do not feel like covering Trump of Biden in weekly news.
 
Dr.Sid said:
So you think it's impossible for Trump to win ? Why ?
Click to expand...

Of course it's not impossible for him to win. What is stupid is posting every time the news media reports on a new poll (just about every day).

Are people going to keep this up for the next year? 12 months so close to 365 nonsense posts on meaningless polls? :rolleyes:
 
Dr.Sid said:
So you think it's impossible for Trump to win ? Why ?
Click to expand...

Trump had good support from his base for 4 years when he did...very little. But then it ended and the base is all he has for the 4 Biden years.

2020 went
Popular vote Biden 81,283,501[1] Trump 74,223,975[1]

I can't predict one thing: turnout. But even with less turnout, it will be difficult for Trump to repeat the 2016 states that he won by very small margins.

I don't trust the polling even for the battleground state at this point.

I will give Trump a 20% chance of winning. But as he will run out of money soon...it will be just his base to get him ad money etc. Biden will not run out of money.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Of course it's not impossible for him to win. What is stupid is posting every time the news media reports on a new poll (just about every day).

Are people going to keep this up for the next year? 12 months so close to 365 nonsense posts on meaningless polls? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Or you can call it closing your eyes before a disaster ..
 
William Parcher said:
Trump narrowly leads Biden in hypothetical rematch, new poll finds, with a tenth of voters undecided...
Click to expand...

I don't know what to think. trump now seems to be openly touting a subversion of our democracy. I don't understand how anyone could even consider voting for him. Except I've read serious people seriously saying, "The system is so bad just destroy it and we'll start all over."

This is turning into a freaking nightmare! :(
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Of course it's not impossible for him to win. What is stupid is posting every time the news media reports on a new poll (just about every day).

Are people going to keep this up for the next year? 12 months so close to 365 nonsense posts on meaningless polls? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

What else are people going to post in this thread for the next year?

I could tell you that Biden's approval rating is lower than Trump's at this point in their respective tenures, if that's of any interest.
 
Solitaire said:
The opposition also has a vote and they can respond in kind by voting
for Dean Philips. You could get into a voting war between the two parties
and both Biden and Trump didn't get the nomination. Now you've entered
Donald Rumsfeld risky game of two unknownable knowns. Anythings possible.
Suppose Philips doesn't know anything about foreign relations and gets into
a nuclear war with China?


Oh, dear.

It appears someone else has the same curiosity with dark powers that I do...
But not the wisdom to choose the devils he knows over the devils he doesn't.
Click to expand...

That's just a rich dude hedging his bets like he does every election.
 
The latest CBS News survey not only shows Biden 4 points under water (in a contest where he needs to not just win but win by at least 4 or 5 so that's really 8 or 9 points under) and a historically low approval rating not just for himself but for Presidents in general at this time in their terms, but also has a new question added about where people got their ideas of how well or badly the economy is going. 85% said their own experience, 72% said people they personally know, 70% said "businesses in their community", and 66% said "national data". Of course, it was already obvious that the "people are actually doing great, they just think it's bad because they hear it's bad for somebody else somewhere out there" excuse was utter nonsense all along, but at least now they've responded to it by getting some numbers that show what nonsense it is in yet another way.

Have no fear, though; Biden has the solution. According to MSNBC, He has finally enlisted the help of the party's wisest and most insightful & successful advisor, the paragon of phenomenal political acumen: Hillary Clinton. Nobody could ever more thoroughly have their finger on the pulse of the people than this team-up of political superpowers! We're saved!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom