-
Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
Retired NASA "expert" Inspires Balsamo Fraud?
- Thread starter beachnut
- Start date
George 152
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2002
- Messages
- 5,012
You get that sort of behaviour with cowards.
And as for his piloting I'd venture to suggest he should stick with MSFS the crashes don't leave wreckage
Mark F
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2012
- Messages
- 1,746
The "9/11 Intercepted - Full Film" thread, starting at post #110.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/consp...epted-full-film-w-13-a-11.html#post1062827646
My 16 year-old daughter could give Cap'n Bobby a good swift roundhouse to the plums and he'd never see it coming.
Last edited:
ozeco41
Philosopher
Where I was very naughty at post #137 - and as expected - got ignored.
My bad habit - I tend to keep asking "what about draining the swamp?" Comes from years managing engineers who get focussed on details and lose the plot. "Why are we doing this?"
You can sort of forgive P4T - after all - focussing on alligators or trees is his second strategy after "attack witnesses first".
Did you pay royalties to use that theme?
OK "My 43 and 42 years-old....."
Last edited:
weedwhacker
Student
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2009
- Messages
- 25
Fascinating to read these updates on Rob Balsamo, and to see that the "Woo Is Still Strong With That One" (apologies to George Lucas...on second thought, maybe not).
I "fondly" remember what has to have been his 'best' sock-puppet account ever..."TiffanyInLA". Ah, good times...
Upon seeing that he's still at it, even as the so-called "9/11 truth movement" has finally been sputtering to a halt, makes me think that he's wasting perfectly good 'woo'.
He could be jumping on the "chem"trail bandwagon, or maybe the Apollo "hoax" nonsense....they're still going strong! With hisskills, ah, erm..."unique style" of lying through his tooth, he'd be a natural in those realms.
I "fondly" remember what has to have been his 'best' sock-puppet account ever..."TiffanyInLA". Ah, good times...
Upon seeing that he's still at it, even as the so-called "9/11 truth movement" has finally been sputtering to a halt, makes me think that he's wasting perfectly good 'woo'.
He could be jumping on the "chem"trail bandwagon, or maybe the Apollo "hoax" nonsense....they're still going strong! With his
Last edited:
ozeco41
Philosopher
IMO that is sound advice for strategy.
jaydeehess
Penultimate Amazing
I see it now. Since Robby is on "break" I helped him out in keeping the thread on topic
Mark F
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2012
- Messages
- 1,746
I see it now. Since Robby is on "break" I helped him out in keeping the thread on topic
Fun. I didn't know he'd been nicked.
I think Robert Balsamo is posting for Henry David. Henry David used the laughing gif, like Balsamo does. I think that is where they hide all their knowledge on 911, with the overwhelming evidence.
jaydeehess
Penultimate Amazing
We'll beachnut, if that is true then they both may be on their way out permanently.
Is the left one gone? If not, I recommend you bet my left nut, not yours. When I am sure, extra sure, I usually bet the other persons stuff on it. Win, win.
It sounded like Balsamo in a way, with the smiley gif, where they store their evidence.
ozeco41
Philosopher
Vastly different styles IMO beachnut. Too different in persistent style for one person of moderate skills to be one and pretend the other - or pretend both.
Successful "Poeing" requires a significant level of intelligence to maintain consistency whist avoiding drifting where the logic naturally leads to pro "official story" positions. Neither of those persons other posts show any signs of such a level of intelligent argument. Both are readily calibrate able - and one is one grade higher than the other (IMO
).The principal tricks of their styles are quite different. For example HD in his subtler - better quality - posts relies on ambiguous implication without explicitly saying anything. RB relies primarily on personal insult - overt or snide - then a focus on irrelevant minutiae to distract from the otherwise obvious fact that he has no 9/11 conspiracy legitimate objective or claim. And there are only two legitimate aviation based 9/11 claims AFAICS - (1) the planes didn't end up 2 x WTC, 1 x Pentagon and 1 x Ground at Shanksville. OR (2) there should or could have been shoot-down.
Showing data which says "large jet took off from open farmland".. is IMNSHO proof only of "the data or its interpretation is wrong" but "so what?". I don't accept "plane took off from farmland" as a serious option.
ozeco41
Philosopher
Bet mine - no longer involved for production line assembly work. Last addition to the eco/rco output was 38 years back and that one was acquired "fully pre-assembled".
booNyzarC
Scholar
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2012
- Messages
- 65
Both still fully intact and fully operational. I'm not concerned about losing either with this bet. I'm not in the habit of making bets about things that I'm doubtful of, if the stakes include anatomical pieces.
I'm not surprised Ballsucker is still around, but I don't think it's worthwhile for anyone to be concerned about his influence. He is a "has been" loser.
He does use multiple socks profusely. In fact, there are several on his own forum. If anyone appears who agrees with him in a forum, I'd suspect it's a sock. It's quite obvious that he uses proxy's very proficiently that appears to be spontaneous.
All of the garbage on his site has major flaws, distortions. and outright lies. Virtually all of them have been totally debunked. The ones that haven't been totally debunked don't matter anyway as they are simply innuendos to create doubt.
Good luck with engaging him directly. I know it's entertaining, but I don't think it's really matters anymore as he has destroyed his own credibility with so much fallacious garbage that no one of an import listens to him anymore...
He does use multiple socks profusely. In fact, there are several on his own forum. If anyone appears who agrees with him in a forum, I'd suspect it's a sock. It's quite obvious that he uses proxy's very proficiently that appears to be spontaneous.
All of the garbage on his site has major flaws, distortions. and outright lies. Virtually all of them have been totally debunked. The ones that haven't been totally debunked don't matter anyway as they are simply innuendos to create doubt.
Good luck with engaging him directly. I know it's entertaining, but I don't think it's really matters anymore as he has destroyed his own credibility with so much fallacious garbage that no one of an import listens to him anymore...
jaydeehess
Penultimate Amazing
Who was it that Balsamo threatened to put a bullet in his head? Gravy? Reheat?
ozeco41
Philosopher
IIRC Gravy.
https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/semiliterateparanoiacswhofantasizeaboutt
“Mark Roberts deserves to die a traitors [sic] death for trying to suppress 9/11 families from seeking the Truth.”–"Pilots for Truth" founder, and ex-commercial pilot, Robert Balsamo
...And a few months later:
"Mark Roberts does deserve to die a traitors death....
I will not apologize for it this time. I will be there for his death should America fall into Civil War. That is not a threat. .that is a promise.
If he gets in my way of defending our Constitution.. it will be my pleasure to put a bullet in his head to defend our Constitution from enemies foreign or domestic." –"Pilots for Truth" founder Robert Balsamo, panicking after I challenged him to a debate. (Punctuation left as is.) ---
Mark Roberts
Last edited: