What Rodman is doing is in the best interests of the US and the Western World. He won't be fooling anyone that matters. And might, in future, come in handy in some capacity.
For all I know, he's being secretly sponsored now by the CIA.
.
.
Has anyone considered the fact that maybe he wants what he says he wants, and that is to bring some element of acceptable American culture to the enslaved people of North Korea. (or what his spokesman says . . ., can hardly understand rodman myself)
Rodman is not smart, not articulate, and not very apt to consider how he presents himself, but I can guarantee he understands that if he came out publicly against the regime that any chance of gaining cultural acceptance for anything, basketball or otherwise, in that country is not going to happen.
Then further what would be achieved by Rodman condemning Kim?
Nothing.
The People, capital P, are the ones who will eventually lead that country out of enslavement, not Dennis Rodman, and not any of you. That can happen many ways, one of which is shifting perceptions of Western cultures.
On the surface its easy to spit vitriol, and condemnation Rodmans way, it is much harder to think deeply and ask considered questions about how North Korea can be changed from the inside out, and if this has any bearing on the subject.
That kind of change takes time. In a hundred years if North Korea becomes a stable and productive nation that threw off its shackles some historians may just point out that even the simple minded Rodman played a role.
Maybe I am too optimistic, but nothing happens without believing it can.