• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Continuation Part Six: Discussion of the Amanda Knox/Raffaele Sollecito case

Status
Not open for further replies.
Did Giacomo confirm this ? I've always thought Guede held her down on her knees, sodomized her then released himself into the pillow. It's not necessarily what other's have theorized but the only information I've known about this was that she had anal sex recently. Do we have any source that says for sure ?

This was supposed to be why Amanda was asked about Vasoline.

Wow...we're really speculating to how Meredith and Giacomo had sex? Who cares? None of this has any relevance to Meredith's murder.

You have a problem with speculating? You?

No it has no relevance unless Amanda's sex life has relevance, as apparently Crini is saying.
 
You may have to go down a slight gravel incline to reach the gate but there is nothing to block the view of the window and the white building. There is a short not great video on utube of Via Della Pergola.A walk by the cottage coming from the stairs behind piazza Grimana and crossing Sant Antonio by the cottage gate. This one,the observer does not stand in front of the gate however he quickly walks by and views the cottage across from the car park.

(posted from my iPad)


The real reason that Brairs won't post that link is that anyone that views it will know that it's just another lie. Nobody is going to cross the road there unless their destination is the cottage or an intent to photograph the cottage from the quite dangerous position against the rail on that narrow road.

If Rudy was worried that someone could walk down those steps and then see him climbing in through the window, he need only walk back to the gate to see if there were anybody on those lighted steps or in the lighted garage headed his way. More likely, he assumed that if nobody was currently home, they wouldn't be comming home any time soon on this long Holliday weekend.
 
So??? This is anecdotal and means nothing. I had three trick or treaters this year on Halloween. So given that you would think I would have had 30 over the last 10 years. But guess what? Those 3 are the only trick or treaters that I have had ever.

You keep acting like the cottage was in the middle of Times Square. But it wasn't.

Seriously Briars, Do you really think breaking in through that window is so unbelievable that no one would do it?

My guess is that you are just arguing the company line.

Believe it no ,nor do I believe that fellow goes down the chimney anymore.
 
Can you google view to cottage gate piazza Grimana? It comes up . The car park is just around the corner of the building on the right. You also will be able to see the view to the gate from the piazza rail. The rail next to the bench where Curatolo sat.

As I said, none of the videos show this.

The video you linked to does not show what you claim it does at the time required by your arguement.

Daytime traffic on a normal day does not equate to 20:30 traffic on a public holiday.

Most noticable is the pedestrian behaviour, which is thoroughly incompatible with your claimed behavioural norms.
 
I repeat watch the video on utube ,view from gate piazza grimana ,shot at 8:3o pm Three pedestrians pass and about 10 cars in less than 3 minutes

Please provide a link. This video was shot at 8:30 on the night of the dead?

What is the name of the video? I don't believe the video exists if no link is provided.
 
I am a bit confused, can someone enlighten me. Reading the google translation of the prosecution case, it appears that PL attorney is making an argument and re-introducing the interrogation that I thought had been ruled inadmissible by the supreme court. Is the callunia conviction being retried? Or is it just the penalty he argues for the four year sentence. Again there seems to be the argument that AK implicated PL knowing he was innocent (I infer that this can only be true if she was guilty). What is happening?

I think you are right about the aggravating factor for the calunnia still being on the table in the current appeal. I was doing my best to wade through the SC decision ordering the retrial (this is the injustice-anywhere translation) to find out for sure. I think this bit applies:

2.1.16 shows contradictory and illogical reasoning as to the non- recognition of aggravating teleological links, considered in relation to the crime of slander. The Court of Second Instance in recognizing the crime of slander on the part of the Knox, excluded any relationship with the murder. It would not be explained how the Court inferred that the young defendant was stressed by the interrogation and therefore had committed slander in order to free herself from the questions of these investigators, since none of the young people who lived in that house, none of the friends of Kercher or others who in the days immediately after the murder were called and subjected to hearings, had the insane idea of committing slander to remove the weight of the same; it had to be considered that it was Knox who went to the police station of her own free will to accompany Sollecito; and those that the Court called interrogations were nothing more than summary information, to which the young woman was subjected without any forcing; the indication of Lumumba was by no means suggested by the police who asked Knox if she had simply responded to the message which he had sent and which resulted from his cell phone and the negative response of the young woman and the opposite appeared to be what she answered.
 
Believe it no ,nor do I believe that fellow goes down the chimney anymore.

So what are you saying? That you really think it is so un-probable that no one would do it or that it really isn't so unbelievable and you're just mentally masturbating??
 
Can you google view to cottage gate piazza Grimana? It comes up . The car park is just around the corner of the building on the right. You also will be able to see the view to the gate from the piazza rail. The rail next to the bench where Curatolo sat.

If this is the one it was taken near high noon and in summer or early fall. It was not taken at 8:30 on the night of the dead in November. No one walks by the entrance to the gate.
 
(posted from my iPad)


The real reason that Brairs won't post that link is that anyone that views it will know that it's just another lie. Nobody is going to cross the road there unless their destination is the cottage or an intent to photograph the cottage from the quite dangerous position against the rail on that narrow road.

If Rudy was worried that someone could walk down those steps and then see him climbing in through the window, he need only walk back to the gate to see if there were anybody on those lighted steps or in the lighted garage headed his way. More likely, he assumed that if nobody was currently home, they wouldn't be comming home any time soon on this long Holliday weekend.

You can watch it easily on utube The car park is across from the gate and the only stretch of area to stand safely. Instead of accusing someone of lying which seems to be your usual weak reaction ,post images and show where the exit and entrance to to the public parking is.So google street for starters Viale Sant Antonio . Or parcheggio Sant'Antonio.
 
Briars said:
I repeat watch the video on utube ,view from gate piazza grimana ,shot at 8:3o pm Three pedestrians pass and about 10 cars in less than 3 minutes

So??? This is anecdotal and means nothing. I had three trick or treaters this year on Halloween. So given that you would think I would have had 30 over the last 10 years. But guess what? Those 3 are the only trick or treaters that I have had ever.

You keep acting like the cottage was in the middle of Times Square. But it wasn't.

Seriously Briars, Do you really think breaking in through that window is so unbelievable that no one would do it?

My guess is that you are just arguing the company line.

If nothing else, Briars should keep his day-job. Clearly he would not make it as a burglar. He completely overthinks a routine, easy break-in.
 
.
It keeps people discussing Briar's agenda, instead of discussing important issues like what happened to the gold watch Rudy stole, why Rudy was released, why the Perugian police even knew who Rudy was when the Milan police contacted them, how Rudy circumvented the alarm at the lawyer's office, how he gained access to the school, was he a police informant.

Rudy BRUTALLY MURDERED Meredith. Meredith, who just like Raffaele and Amanda would never hurt anyone, who was just a student preparing for an honest life, who just wanted to come home to a quiet apartment, study a bit, and go to bed, had her whole beautiful life and future ended in an instant by a cold heartless savage Rudy and his knife. Rudy, who had absolutely NO business being there. He broke in. He was a burglar. The cottage was dark and empty. He even admits to being there around 8:30 pm and seeing nobody was home. He was a burglar. He broke in. It is what burglars do! I repeat. It is what burglars do!! Let me repeat it one more time. It is what burglars do!! His choice of entry does not depend on Briar's opinion, it depends on his own opinion. He was a burglar. He not only broke in, he broke in the same way he broke into the lawyer's office by climbing the grate to get to the second floor. He was even more visible there, by the way. He used large rocks to break windows for entry. He was a burglar. It is what burglars do!!

So ignore all the evidence that 'poor' Rudy broke in and cut Meredith's throat Briars. Respect for Meredith? CRAP! Protecting Mignini, yeah.
.

Agree. Rudy = burglar. Rudy = murderer.

The volume of traffic and the lighting on the street are not going to outweigh the evidence of his documented career as a burglar and the physical evidence he left in the cottage.
 
If this is the one it was taken near high noon and in summer or early fall. It was not taken at 8:30 on the night of the dead in November. No one walks by the entrance to the gate.

Yes that is it! Thanks. Taken in June around 8:30pm posted also on .net . Someone crosses the street and another couple walks by coming from the car park no doubt. It would be hard to get someone to walk in front in just 3 minutes of filming. However please note the car park is just around the corner with lots of cars and in order to cross safely the area by the side of the gate is the best choice. That wider area across from the car park is a bit cut off in the video but can be seen on google street.
 
What is surprising with the world wide knowledge that Amanda is guilty particulary the Italians and the "sources" the PGP sites have, that no video has been made at 8:30 on one of the 6 nights on the Day of Dead that have passed since the murder.

Briars you might as well be showing a video of the road on a day it is closed for a parade and showing us all the people on it that could see the cottage.

Rudy claims he was invited into the house by Meredith. Why do you not believe him?

Why do you think that the "staged" break-in used Rudy's MO?

Why would the kids think of staging but coordinating an alibi? Don't you think that is stranger than Rudy picking F's window?

If there had not been a broken window, would you suspect the kids or Rudy?

Either way it would be the kids, right? So it doesn't really matter if the window was visible or not.
 
Yes that is it! Thanks. Taken in June around 8:30pm posted also on .net . Someone crosses the street and another couple walks by coming from the car park no doubt. It would be hard to get someone to walk in front in just 3 minutes of filming. However please note the car park is just around the corner with lots of cars and in order to cross safely the area by the side of the gate is the best choice. That wider area across from the car park is a bit cut off in the video but can be seen on google street.

Is there a reason why it was not posted on .ORG?
 
Yes that is it! Thanks. Taken in June around 8:30pm posted also on .net . Someone crosses the street and another couple walks by coming from the car park no doubt. It would be hard to get someone to walk in front in just 3 minutes of filming. However please note the car park is just around the corner with lots of cars and in order to cross safely the area by the side of the gate is the best choice. That wider across from the car park is a bit cut off in the video but can be seen on google street.

Briars please look at the shadows made by the cars. The shadows are directly under the cars not to one side. The video was shot near the middle of the day. There is no shadow from the man walking.
 
What is surprising with the world wide knowledge that Amanda is guilty particulary the Italians and the "sources" the PGP sites have, that no video has been made at 8:30 on one of the 6 nights on the Day of Dead that have passed since the murder.
I had the same thought.

I was also wondering if they have problems at the cottage with true crime devotees trying the climb to Filomena's window. The way the conversation was going a while ago, I thought a few folks here might be itching to have a go at it! :)
 
I had the same thought.

I was also wondering if they have problems at the cottage with true crime devotees trying the climb to Filomena's window. The way the conversation was going a while ago, I thought a few folks here might be itching to have a go at it! :)

What makes you think they haven't? :p
 
You can watch it easily on utube The car park is across from the gate and the only stretch of area to stand safely. Instead of accusing someone of lying which seems to be your usual weak reaction ,post images and show where the exit and entrance to to the public parking is.So google street for starters Viale Sant Antonio . Or parcheggio Sant'Antonio.


What does "ingresso" mean?


Of course, if you want pictures, when I get back to a real computer i'll see if I can access the earlier images of that intersection from before they reprinted the lane markers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom