Sweeping generalisations FTW!It is interesting that the males who sell SEX in porn are circumcised.
I've seen plenty of uncut men in porn.
Sweeping generalisations FTW!It is interesting that the males who sell SEX in porn are circumcised.
May I interest you in this thread and this thread or posts like these or these. You may find it will enlighten your confusion.
Why?
For me it's an issue of body autonomy. I cannot endorse any form of unnecessary body modification performed without informed consent.
If someone wants to get snipped when they're old enough to understand the consequences, I've no problem with that.
I do have a problem with permanently altering someone else's body, without their permission, for no good reason.
I'm cut, because that was just the norm when I was born, but my boys aren't. I couldn't find any good reason to void the warranty on a brand new baby.
But that said, I don't approve of laws preventing other people making that choice.
Sweeping generalisations FTW!
I've seen plenty of uncut men in porn.
It's pretty much irrelevant anyway. People are not vaccinating babies for that reason, but using that reason to rationalize afterwards. I don't think anyone's expecting their days-old baby to be indulging in unprotected sex, and if they want to do so later in life, they can make that decision then, though as much as I know that many men (and some women) are not keen on using condoms, I would have thought that most people think them preferable to a surgical procedure that provides at best the possibility of a slight protective effect.I'm pretty extreme when it comes to my anti-circumcision opinions, but I'm pretty sure you're wrong there. The big HIV/circumcision trial a while back was pretty flawless. There was also a smaller trial a while back showing that female circumcision has a similar effect. Sadly, it seems to make sense, in the sense that a pathogen which is adapted to sexual transmission is probably adapted to "normal" human genitals, so chopping genital parts off (in either gender) will interfere with how the pathogen has adapted to spread from host to host.
That said, it only applies to areas with endemic HIV among heterosexuals (basically Africa) and condoms still work better.
Ah! Thanks. This was my first time with ABC.
I don't find an AIDS diagnosis irrelevant at all which increases with non circumcision as demonstrated by studies. Vaccines are the greatest achievement of modern medicine and the biggest reasons that the average life span is now 78 and not 45 as it was years ago. Isolated communicable disease epidemics where children die are shameful and unnecessary due to careless parents.It's pretty much irrelevant anyway. People are not vaccinating babies for that reason, but using that reason to rationalize afterwards. I don't think anyone's expecting their days-old baby to be indulging in unprotected sex, and if they want to do so later in life, they can make that decision then, though as much as I know that many men (and some women) are not keen on using condoms, I would have thought that most people think them preferable to a surgical procedure that provides at best the possibility of a slight protective effect.
That's a slightly bizarre response. I also don't find an AIDS diagnosis irrelevant, and I don't think that it's a reasonable inference to make from what I said.I don't find an AIDS diagnosis irrelevant at all and the studies are true.
Vaccinations is the greatest achievement of modern medicine and one of the reasons that the average life span is now 78 and not 45 as it was years ago. Isolated communicable disease epidemics are shameful due to careless parents.
"It's pretty much irrelevant anyway" per Post # 86.That's a slightly bizarre response. I also don't find an AIDS diagnosis irrelevant, and I don't think that it's a reasonable inference to make from what I said.
The conversation was about the flawless HIV/Circumcision trials.That's a slightly bizarre response. I also don't find an AIDS diagnosis irrelevant, and I don't think that it's a reasonable inference to make from what I said.
Jesus Christ. Right, the fact that some studies appear to show that circumcision may have a slight protective effect against HIV infection is irrelevant to the reason why parents circumcise their children, particularly in the US and Europe. Is that a little bit clearer? I'm fairly sure no one else had trouble with it."It's pretty much irrelevant anyway" per Post # 86.
I've no problem with people having the choice to get cut.
I've a problem with people who mutilate children for no good reason, and without consent from the person whose body is being altered.
Not being argumentative but of curiosity, do you consider religion a "good reason" to circumcise?
Likewise.If that's why it was done to me, it failed miserably.![]()
You are not permitted to have not suffered severe trauma over the issue. Didn't you see the hedge clippers in that Nordic cartoon? The way the trimming was depicted, it is almost a nodick cartoon.Cut Jewish man reporting for duty, sir. All ok with snip-snip, I survived the memories of the 8th day of my life, all is well...
How dare you be a reasonable person in such a drama and emotion laced thread?Eta: For the record, I am circumcised, & it doesn't bother me at all. I just don't see a reason for it other than medical.
Your ignorance is disappointing, given how long I've participated with you guys on these JREF forums.rustypouch said:Yep. I've no problem if adults choose to get snipped. It's mutilating infants for no good reason that bothers me.Ryokan said:Well, it comes into a different light if you see the children as individuals and not as props in the religious beliefs of their parents.LL said:Article 2 of the Constitution of Norway: "All inhabitants of the Realm shall have the right to free exercise of their religion."
So, basically that'll kill any attempt to ban circumcision.
I could be wrong. I don't know the future. I'm not wrong, but I could be.
Well, why not as they already have to report on other domestic violence and abuse. And children including infants do also get their medical checks by nurses/doctors who also keep related medical records.How to enforce such a law? Do we have the school doctor/nurse report circumcised boys without a medical record of such procedure to the police?
Presumably both.Who will get prosecuted, the parents or the slasher?
Likewise.
You are not permitted to have not suffered severe trauma over the issue. Didn't you see the hedge clippers in that Nordic cartoon? The way the trimming was depicted, it is almost a nodick cartoon.
How dare you be a reasonable person in such a drama and emotion laced thread?
Now, if only we had some mega thread covering circumcision, or maybe a few of them, on the JREF forums, we could just send people to those garbage dumps of inane argument and posturing.
Hmm, where might one be?
Or another one?
Or another one?
Here's a bit from the hedge trimmer that hit the floor in Norway.
And there's this one
Folks on JREF sure like to talk about penises, and that ten percent off the top sale.
And as for "way to keep it classy" two of you need a little work.
Your ignorance is disappointing, given how long I've participated with you guys on these JREF forums.
My parents are not much of religious anything, but in 195x had my brother, and then me in 195x+2, trimmed as that was the "conventional wisdom" of the day. Six years later, in 196x, my younger brother likewise. Nothing religious about it.
I know you two well enough to know that you both know that Loss Leader is a practicing Jew, father of two kids, and a decent person.
Right up there, you two just spit in his face. Not well played, gentlemen.![]()
Sorry, I'm not judging in that case.spin0
in re the post on Finland ...
Great idea. Put that doctor in jail.
Can't see how that would happen to his patients.Screw all of his other patients up the butt over the lie told by that father.