Merged 9/11 No Plane/Energy Weapon discussion thread

[Clayton Moore]

You expect the plane to be visibly damaged before hitting the building?

Yes.

And the plane should skew/tumble in some way after the initial contact. The first contacts with the VERY sturdy tower should redirect the body of the jet.

 

[dafydd]

Yes.

And the plane should skew/tumble in some way after the initial contact. The first contacts with the VERY sturdy tower should redirect the body of the jet.

Thou jesteth, or you have never had a physics lesson in your life. Do you believe that the steel was turned to dust by an energy beam weapon?

 

[ozeco41]

Thou jesteth, or hast thou never had a physics lesson in thy life? Dost thou believe that the steel wast turned to dust by an energy beam weapon?

FTFY (I think)



E&OE

 

[Clayton Moore]

Originally Posted by Clayton Moore View Post

Yes.

And the plane should skew/tumble in some way after the initial contact. The first contacts with the VERY sturdy tower should redirect the body of the jet.

Thou jesteth, or you have never had a physics lesson in your life. Do you believe that the steel was turned to dust by an energy beam weapon?

What does your response have to do with the OP or what I said in my post?

 

[Dcdrac]

the fantasy of an energy weapon being used to destroy the buildings.......

Can you imaginehow much power that would take to achieve?

Are you seriously suggessting there were mobile generators producing enough power to demolish two very large buildings.

 

[fess]

What does your response have to do with the OP or what I said in my post?

I think the response has something to do with the stupidity of your remarks. It has become clearly evident that you know nothing about what you are talking about.

How can you and Dusty expect to see deformation of the aircraft hitting a building at over 700 ft/sec? And how can the fuel ignite the moment it hits the building when it is still in a liquid state? Do you know what UEL/LEL means?

 

[Clayton Moore]

the fantasy of an energy weapon being used to destroy the buildings.......

Can you imaginehow much power that would take to achieve?

About that much.

 

[Border Reiver]

[qimg]http://www.sharpprintinginc.com/911/images/pagemaster/911_HighQualityPhotos305_we.jpg[/qimg]

About that much.

So, how much energy would a weapon need to generate in order to achieve that result? And where were the generators that powered it?

 

[Regnad Kcin]

About that much.

I stand in awe of your rigorous scientific calculations.

 

[Dcdrac]

And someone would definitly noticed one of tese flying around

http://www.hightech-edge.com/wp-content/uploads/boeing-747-mounted-airborne-laser.jpg

 

[Clayton Moore]

So, how much energy would a weapon need to generate in order to achieve that result? And where were the generators that powered it?

Did I broach the energy weapon? Nope.

It's funny you're demanding I tell you how much energy would be required when you're also demanding no outside energy was needed to cause the massive destruction including pulverization into dust of the concrete floors.

 

[Dcdrac]

The title includes energy weapons.

there were none

the only weapons used were hijacked airliners

 

[Tomtomkent]

Did I broach the energy weapon? Nope.

It's funny you're demanding I tell you how much energy would be required when you're also demanding no outside energy was needed to cause the massive destruction including pulverization into dust of the concrete floors.

Yeah, real strange thing to ask you about, In a conversation about energy weapons. In which you are advocating planes were fake. Why on Earth would anybody ask you a question about the title of the thread?

 

[fess]

[qimg]http://www.sharpprintinginc.com/911/images/pagemaster/911_HighQualityPhotos305_we.jpg[/qimg]

About that much.

Why would you need power after the building has already started to collapse?

 

[Mudcat]

Why would you need power after the building has already started to collapse?

Wouldn't the building be assisting in it's own destruction considering all the energy stored in the form of potential energy? Truthers needs to brush up on their basic physics, starting with the laws of thermodynamics.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

It's funny you're demanding I tell you how much energy would be required when you're also demanding no outside energy was needed to cause the massive destruction including pulverization into dust of the concrete floors.

The building was full of energy, put into it during construction. All those cranes, labouring away against gravity day after day, were working to put massive amounts of potential energy into the structure.

 

[beachnut]

... you're also demanding no outside energy was needed to cause the massive destruction including pulverization into dust of the concrete floors.

Physics steps in to destroy the fantasy of 911 truth, the movement of woo.

E=mgh do the math, learn about energy. Physics students have more fun. Oops, another model...

 

[Regnad Kcin]

It's funny you're demanding I tell you how much energy would be required when you're also demanding no outside energy was needed to cause the massive destruction including pulverization into dust of the concrete floors.

Of course there was "outside energy": gravity.

 

[Mudcat]

Of course there was "outside energy": gravity.

I have to admit to a certain morbid curiosity about what Truthers think should have happened with the WTC.

 

[TheRedWorm]

Wouldn't the building be assisting in it's own destruction considering all the energy stored in the form of potential energy? Truthers needs to brush up on their basic physics, starting with the laws of thermodynamics.every field of knowledge there is.

There was a small error in your post that I have corrected.