• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Proving the Aurora Theater Shooting's official story false

Oh the laughter, of which i am sincerely experiencing, is coming from the realization of the absurdity possessed by those of you that are trying to explain the experiences they report to have had as a collective illusory episode. For instance, the flashes, the hissing sounds, the firecracker popping noises, the heat, they were all experiencing illusions which coincided with shrapnel injuries, and bullet trajectory inconsistencies...

That is a totally valid conclusion. Not at all very sound, but totally valid. Hmmmm :-)
 
thaiboxerken said:
Why do you feel that the death of so many people is just a hoax? Really?! Do you think the government is just doing this for S&G's? Really?!

Grow up.
Click to expand...

I would say that Neveos does not know what he thinks, because his Masters have not told him what to think yet, which explains his unwillingness to say where this fits in to the BIG PICTURE.

He does not have a clue as to what a Football team had to do with anything, or why this event happened in the first place. He has no idea as to how this event fits into the "Big Picture" because he has not been told how it does. That actually requires a brain. And it appears that he is not allowed to think judging by his posts in this thread.

Perhaps the videos he watches have turned his brain into mud.

Norm
 
Sure, let me just repeat everything for you. :-)
Click to expand...
Here, let me try.

:cool: A wild CONSPIRACY THEORIST appears!

CONSPIRACY THEORIST uses YOUTUBE!
It's not very effective . . .
CONSPIRACY THEORIST uses YOUTUBE!
It's not very effective . . .
CONSPIRACY THEORIST uses YOUTUBE!
It's not very effective . . .

:crowded: SKEPTICS use RATIONAL APPROACH!

CONSPIRACY THEORIST uses DODGE!
The RATIONAL APPROACH misses the CONSPIRACY THEORIST:duck:!

CONSPIRACY THEORIST uses REPEAT QUESTIONS!
It's not very effective...:dig:

CONSPIRACY THEORIST uses TROLL!
It's super effective:jaw-dropp!

SKEPTICS use FACEPALM!

CONSPIRACY THEORIST uses LAUGHTER!

And so on for three pages...
 
Last edited:
Neveos said:
Oh the laughter, of which i am sincerely experiencing, is coming from the realization of the absurdity possessed by those of you that are trying to explain the experiences they report to have had as a collective illusory episode. For instance, the flashes, the hissing sounds, the firecracker popping noises, the heat, they were all experiencing illusions which coincided with shrapnel injuries, and bullet trajectory inconsistencies...

That is a totally valid conclusion. Not at all very sound, but totally valid. Hmmmm :-)
Click to expand...

Please quote the posts where the group illusion was suggested. I can only find posts describing why witness memories are unreliable.

Please explain why you feel the need to share your laughter at all
Do you think it is appropriate?
 
fromdownunder said:
He does not have a clue as to what a Football team had to do with anything, or why this event happened in the first place. He has no idea as to how this event fits into the "Big Picture" because he has not been told how it does.
Click to expand...


Oh, our cocky young friend sure does have an idea why this happened. Here it is:

Young Neveos tried to prevent an imaginary plot against Ron Paul, so TPTB staged the Aurora shooting to discredit him by picking a patsy that was based on his "persona" on purpose. However, when our brilliant protagonist started to "slam the entire operation" through vigorous YouTubing, they had to "kill or fire" a number of people "involved in the cover-up", including ... wait for it ... Tony Scott. This is only the synopsis from a YouTube video description, so there might be more scandal for anyone who actually bothers to watch one and a half hours of late night rambling. Naturally the evildoers are after young Neveos now, too, but apparently the death squads are to stupid to find his house.

I wish I was kidding, but I'm not, so it's really not just the stupid smiley in front of the thread title that says something is wrong here. I'm not quite sure any attempts at rational discussion will be fruitful here. It appears that the only reason why this guy is here is so he can claim he was "Pwning the JREF" on YouTube.
 
Neveos said:
Oh the laughter, of which i am sincerely experiencing, is coming from the realization of the absurdity possessed by those of you that are trying to explain the experiences they report to have had as a collective illusory episode. For instance, the flashes, the hissing sounds, the firecracker popping noises, the heat, they were all experiencing illusions which coincided with shrapnel injuries, and bullet trajectory inconsistencies...

That is a totally valid conclusion. Not at all very sound, but totally valid. Hmmmm :-)
Click to expand...

OK. You love laughing at murder victims. Gotcha.

And you really love grossly misrepresenting your opponents arguments. Gotcha.

You might want to look up the difference between witness unreliability and 'collective illusion' before you laugh yourself into a coma thinking about murder victims.
 
oh do please alert people to that testimony video. please do so. but you didn't. Instead, you revealed something else about yourself entirely: that you linked to a video which was "unlisted". Meaning you had resources to have used that link.

But by all means, in your anxiety, that would be more than welcome. :-) Make a big deal out of it.

I have all the angles covered. The checkmate plays out on the news before your eyes.
 
Neveos said:
oh do please alert people to that testimony video. please do so. but you didn't. Instead, you revealed something else about yourself entirely: that you linked to a video which was "unlisted". Meaning you had resources to have used that link.

But by all means, in your anxiety, that would be more than welcome. :-) Make a big deal out of it.
Click to expand...

English, please.

I have all the angles covered. The checkmate plays out on the news before your eyes.
Click to expand...

Brag brag braggity brag. Do bring something tangible next time you try to 'pwn JREFFF!!!!'.
 
Neveos said:
oh do please alert people to that testimony video. please do so. but you didn't. Instead, you revealed something else about yourself entirely: that you linked to a video which was "unlisted". Meaning you had resources to have used that link.
Click to expand...
He sure did have resources to use that link: you. It's the feature video on your YouTube profile. You posted 6 videos from your YouTube account. One click on your name is all that is required to get to the video in question.

Sinister stuff, amigo. Better watch out for another heart attack gun attempt.

 
Right. So how are differet people reporting different things sharing an illusion?

Or describing the same "real" story?

Why is confusion not the most likely answer?
 
D'rok said:
He sure did have resources to use that link: you. It's the feature video on your YouTube profile. You posted 6 videos from your YouTube account. One click on your name is all that is required to get to the video in question.

Sinister stuff, amigo. Better watch out for another heart attack gun attempt.

Click to expand...

The Interwebs, how do they :rule10 work?
 
Neveos said:
Oh the laughter, of which i am sincerely experiencing, is coming from the realization of the absurdity possessed by those of you that are trying to explain the experiences they report to have had as a collective illusory episode.
Click to expand...
And my reaction to your empty rhetoric is to wonder how it is you don't understand burden-of-proof.

But I'll guess you actually do understand, which is why you so desperately avoid it.
 
Neveos said:
oh do please alert people to that testimony video. please do so. but you didn't. Instead, you revealed something else about yourself entirely: that you linked to a video which was "unlisted". Meaning you had resources to have used that link.

But by all means, in your anxiety, that would be more than welcome. :-) Make a big deal out of it.

I have all the angles covered. The checkmate plays out on the news before your eyes.
Click to expand...


While I'm not quite sure what you are talking about, I cannot help noticing that you reacted to my last post by deleting the video in which you said that "they" want to kill you and that if you stop posting, you're probably dead. How's that for "anxiety"? That video was "listed" here, btw, in post #4. Quite some "resources" I had there, didn't I?

Anyway, I can only agree with the guy from the link avove: you need to calm down a bit. Considering your posting habits, I think you need more sleep, too. Maybe someone who can offer professional help might be able to assist you with that.
 
kookbreaker said:
Heart attack gun?! :roll:

OK, I am seeing NWO kitty having a few words about that one....
Click to expand...



full.png
 
The video originally linked was unlisted. Meaning no, that video was not featured anywhere in recent history, and was promoted solely for the purpose of discrediting me back then. imo, it was warranted, obviously, but regardless, I'm no idiot. Funny you would sell yourself out like that just to perform an ad hominem fallacy. You know actual rational people have already sided with me throughout the process of this thread, right? You guys basically failed pretty miserably at what you were supposed to do. Any college professor (you know, "people that matter") clicking the thread is completely turned to the dark side no matter what you do now. In fact, further "attacking" Thomas Brinkley just turns them on to bigger ****. So.......
 
I was actually just wondering when the connection to Thomas Brinkley would have been conjectured for ad hominem attack. I knew I had won when that happens.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom