Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
Keepers of the family Bees.

Don't be silly.

Keepers: Bees.

If you miss the : your whole legal theory will collapse around you.
Isn't that right Robert-Arthur: Menard?

Care to speak BoBBy?, we all know you are reading this thread....
Not because your pathetic ego forces you to do so of course...

..Simply because you are:
picture.php

...A pathetic little man.
 
Last edited:
I sent e-mails to the newspaper that reported on the Lance Thatcher case with details about Menards nefarious activities, I also copied Menard in on them so he would know they were sent.
The mails I sent included a mail I recieved from Menard admitting he took $800 from Lance.
Menard also e-mailed the paper in a panic trying to cover his tracks saying I was a stalker and troll.

Care to speak BoBBy?, we all know you are reading this thread....
Not because your pathetic ego forces you to do so of course...

..Simply because you are:
...A pathetic little man.

Yes, it’s so like the little narcissistic boy trying to cover the lies he told his hypercritical daddy with more lies.

Many personality problems are resolved with love, care, therapy and sometimes simply with maturity. But it would seem that in this case the subject has resisted treatment and still behaves very much as a child.
 
Last edited:
On a more serious note, it appears as if Menard is attempting to or has succeeded in bluffing and bullying the West Vic Community Centre into releasing information by pretending that this draft order is real.

Or at least he says that's what he did in the caption to the image. Who knows? What a tangled web he weaves...

Wait - if someone feels like they have been compelled into an action due to a legal order...but in reality the legal order is fake and was never authorized...isnt that in and of itself against the law?

By the way, I know its probably an annoyance for the JREFers involved, but we all know Rob will go no where with this and then proclaim it a victory to his crackhead followers. Still, its definitely entertaining to watch him fail...again. And in such an epic fashion.
 
There once was a time, thanks to snake oil salesmen like Eldon Warman and Robert Menard, freemen thought they could escape the authority of the law by using magic words.
<snip>
Ah, Eldon. What is he up to these days? I haven't heard anything from him is a while and a quick search doesn't show much beyond his usual posturing.
 
Ah, Eldon. What is he up to these days? I haven't heard anything from him is a while and a quick search doesn't show much beyond his usual posturing.

He’s old. He claims failing health. Tried to give away his web site . . .had no takers.

Lost his companion a couple of years ago and has had to relocate to Merritt, I think it is.
 
Lost his companion a couple of years ago and has had to relocate to Merritt, I think it is.
A man without merit, relocating to Merritt.

Back to Menard, I can almost see him now rushing around in his formica hut trying to come up with a reason why hes been lying.
"Oh, I never intended to take it to court, I was trying to flush them out into the open then they would have to face me in public, they dare not face the "wolverine" in an open debate, they hide like punks in the shadows.
By the way, can you govern me without my consent without abandoning the rule of law?"
"Thought not, I win again"
 
The dope clock is running!

It is day 23 since Fez boy filed his magic papers and I haven’t gotten one scrap of paper from the courts, heard one peep from my internet and email providers, or in any other way been effected.


. . .tick. . .tick. . .tick

The dope clock is still running!

It is day 25 since Fez boy filed his magic papers and I haven’t gotten one scrap of paper from the courts, heard one peep from my internet and email providers, or in any other way been effected.


. . .tick. . .tick. . .tick
 
A man without merit, relocating to Merritt.

Back to Menard, I can almost see him now rushing around in his formica hut trying to come up with a reason why hes been lying.
"Oh, I never intended to take it to court, I was trying to flush them out into the open then they would have to face me in public, they dare not face the "wolverine" in an open debate, they hide like punks in the shadows.
By the way, can you govern me without my consent without abandoning the rule of law?"
"Thought not, I win again"

His freeman donators need to start holding him acountable for how he uses their money!
 
His freeman donators need to start holding him acountable for how he uses their money!
I doubt he actually has any, its not the first time the smelly fez has been passed around, he did claim for his stolen laptop which miraculously reappeared after the event.
I know they say 'theres one born every minute', for Rob to have any success there would need to be one born every second.
 
Wait - if someone feels like they have been compelled into an action due to a legal order...but in reality the legal order is fake and was never authorized...isnt that in and of itself against the law?
At minimum, he's relying on a granted but unsigned order. I don't know what the ramifications of that are, if any.
 
At minimum, he's relying on a granted but unsigned order. I don't know what the ramifications of that are, if any.

Don't know about Canadia but in the US if you represent false legal documents as true you're already committing a crime -- if you successfully get anything out of it, that just aggravates the situation you'll rapidly find yourself in.

US Courts take a dim view of falsification of such things and you can very easily find yourself facing criminal charges. Don't know if any of them can be upgraded to 'felony' or not, but it is a circumstance that I will not voluntarily put myself in. :D

ETA: Also, I do know it's a binary -- either the papers in question are completely in order, and thus valid, or something is not correct and the whole thing is invalid. A "granted but unsigned" order would fall under "invalid" in this circumstance as the signature is required to make it a valid order. Even making the attempt to use an invalid order would put him officially over the line.
 
Last edited:
Don't know about Canadia but in the US if you represent false legal documents as true you're already committing a crime -- if you successfully get anything out of it, that just aggravates the situation you'll rapidly find yourself in.

US Courts take a dim view of falsification of such things and you can very easily find yourself facing criminal charges. Don't know if any of them can be upgraded to 'felony' or not, but it is a circumstance that I will not voluntarily put myself in. :D

ETA: Also, I do know it's a binary -- either the papers in question are completely in order, and thus valid, or something is not correct and the whole thing is invalid. A "granted but unsigned" order would fall under "invalid" in this circumstance as the signature is required to make it a valid order. Even making the attempt to use an invalid order would put him officially over the line.
I suspect you are exactly correct about this. It was nice of him to advertise his malfeasance in multiple places on the public internet!
 
But do we know that he has actually tried to use this unsigned order to compel anyone to do anything? Or is he just showing it on the internet to impress his followers?
 
But do we know that he has actually tried to use this unsigned order to compel anyone to do anything? Or is he just showing it on the internet to impress his followers?
I don't know for sure. He has certainly made it seem that way with the claims he's made in his posts. That could simply be part of the bluster, which would not be out of character.
 
But do we know that he has actually tried to use this unsigned order to compel anyone to do anything? Or is he just showing it on the internet to impress his followers?

sodomy non sapiens. However, in this particular instance if there becomes reason to believe that he _has_ obtained private information via fraudulent representation, a third party (the WVCC) could be contacted and will give us the straight scoop as need.

I'd never rule against "just talking a bunch of bollocks" where Rob is concerned, but in his blind anger he may well have made a critical mistake and involved a third party with not only no interest in protecting him, but an active interest in disclaiming their own liability under such circumstances.
 
I don't know for sure. He has certainly made it seem that way with the claims he's made in his posts. That could simply be part of the bluster, which would not be out of character.



But at that point, it's win-win for us. He either sticks to his guns, and insists that he really did break the law by asserting a fake court order, or he admits he was just lying about the whole thing. There really doesn't seem to be a third option, if the order was not actually issued by the court.

I'd suggest that bringing these antics to the attention of the court officials dealing with this case would be a fun thing to do the appropriate thing to do to maintain the integrity of the court system :D
 
He either sticks to his guns, and insists that he really did break the law by asserting a fake court order, or he admits he was just lying about the whole thing. There really doesn't seem to be a third option

The third option would be to rush off to court and really hope that he can get a master to sign this order. Then go back and post the signed order and laugh in all our faces. Of course he would need a master to cooperate in order for this to work.
 
Then go back and post the signed order and laugh in all our faces. Of course he would need a master to cooperate in order for this to work.
This would also presume that he has a desire to post irrefutable evidence of a claim. Considering this is page 215 of a request to do such a thing, I somehow doubt it'll happen even if it was signed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom