• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged The election was stolen/rigged!

JayUtah said:
During the voting session, the UI portion of the program manipulates this data structure. When "Cast Vote" is finally selected, the other portion of the program takes over, reading the data structure as previously composed by the UI and rendering it in a form acceptable to the transfer medium. Error- and tamper-check data blocks are added. The place to change the voter's vote is there. The only thing that matters in terms of the vote tally is what goes on that Smart Card. If you're going to change a vote, change it as it's being prepared for storage. There's no inherent condition that requires any sort of thing to be displayed on the screen while a voter's votes are being tallied, recorded, and (allegedly) tampered with.
Click to expand...



Heck you don't even need to get this fancy what with changing actual votes. Just put up a Potemkin-village UI, that shows whatever the user does, and then just disregard all that, and write whatever data you want to the final tally databases. Every race could be decided ahead of time; "80-20 for the President, 75-25 for the Senate....."
 
So, how did Obama manage to get his fangs into whatever apparatus it is that is rigging the election?
 
Robert Prey said:
We have the virtual testimony of non-existent "voters" -- who are counted as having voted for Obama.
Click to expand...

Where are the voters from these areas that are outraged because they know they voted for Romney?
 
Robert Prey said:
Jay Utah wrote:

"Robert gets all his arguments these days from the supermarket tabloids!"

Nonsense. This stuff is all over even the mainstream press. Get a clue.
Click to expand...



No robert....tabloids are not "mainstream press", but you know that, so perhaps it is YOU who are in need of "clues".

Oh, and Obama is President, and there is nothing you can do about it...well, short of something stupid as Tomtom mentioned above :D
 
R.A.F. said:
No robert....tabloids are not "mainstream press", but you know that, so perhaps it is YOU who are in need of "clues".
Click to expand...

Unanimous precincts are being reported in the mainstream press in the United States, at least to the facts of the reports without the speculation over cause. In fact I stipulated this yesterday; it was a premise to my statement that despite this widespread publication of allegedly fraudulent unanimity, the Republican canvassers have yet to uncover one single disenfranchised voter in these precincts they insist must have voted at least in part for Obama. I know that if my precinct reported unanimity contrary to my vote, I'd certainly report it. In practically no other situation would an individual voter be more confident in claiming that his vote had not been counted. Yet no such witnesses are yet forthcoming.
 
I did some personal research, so this is hardly scientific, but... several Romney supporters of my acquaintance in New York City made no vote for president, because they believed it was pointless. They voted only for state, local and congressional seats. No reason that it wouldn't be similar in Philadelphia.
 
mercatormac said:
Non-American here. Just curious to know, was Pennsylvania actually a swing state, and if not what would be the point of fiddling the vote considering that Obama was probably going to win it anyway?
Click to expand...

Symptomatic of massive fraud -- the win "by any means necessary" mantra the Dems have embraced.
 
Horatius said:
Heck you don't even need to get this fancy what with changing actual votes. Just put up a Potemkin-village UI, that shows whatever the user does, and then just disregard all that, and write whatever data you want to the final tally databases. Every race could be decided ahead of time; "80-20 for the President, 75-25 for the Senate....."
Click to expand...

"In a democracy, it matters not who gets the most votes. What matters is, who counts the votes." -- Joseph Stalin
 
I love how the Electoral Fraud Squad could sneak the result past the GOP, but not Robert Prey.
 
Robert Prey said:
"In a democracy, it matters not who gets the most votes. What matters is, who counts the votes." -- Joseph Stalin
Click to expand...

Who was counting the votes in 2008?

Or when the Tea Party made huge gains in 2010?
 
So I was perusing the state results for PA and OH on politico and none of the counties Obama won in either state (a minority of counties) had 0 votes for Romney. So, is there any evidence for Robert's original claim beyond "unofficial" counts?
 
Iwould have thought the GOP would be screamig blue murder and sending out battilions of lawyers all over this, if it was happening....

What do we have deafening silence........
 
elbe said:
So I was perusing the state results for PA and OH on politico and none of the counties Obama won in either state (a minority of counties) had 0 votes for Romney. So, is there any evidence for Robert's original claim beyond "unofficial" counts?
Click to expand...

It's not at the district level, it's at individual precinct level. You have to dig farther down. At least in Philadelphia you can find the results on the web. I checked a few and did not find any with no Romney votes, but there are thousands of precincts and I'm not that motivated to verify the claim. I think it's likely true. Another poster posted links to Wyoming precincts with no Obama votes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom