• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged Apollo "hoax" discussion / Lick observatory laser saga

Status
Not open for further replies.
Typical hoax vid with irrational comparisons....ignorant conclusions...you're really not missing anything.
 
If the producers of a hoax video can't be bothered to check their spelling, they won't have bothered to check their facts.

Stupid video produced by stupid people to fool other stupid people.
 
FatFreddy88 said:
Here's a new hoax video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-r_lcGBdPPw
Click to expand...

Maybe we should setup a new award for forum spammer of the year. I see the same post on the political forum and spurstalk. I'm sure you've scattered it on other forums not indexed by google yet.:jaw-dropp

We have atmosphere on Earth, 6 times more gravity, wind and Morpheus is unmanned. The testing phase is 4 weeks old and this is just a prototype.

Now, if 4 years down the line, they still can't get it to work, you might have the semblance of a point. Why not go away and come back then?
 
Erock said:
Maybe we should setup a new award for forum spammer of the year. I see the same post on the political forum and spurstalk. I'm sure you've scattered it on other forums not indexed by google yet.:jaw-dropp

We have atmosphere on Earth, 6 times more gravity, wind and Morpheus is unmanned. The testing phase is 4 weeks old and this is just a prototype.

Now, if 4 years down the line, they still can't get it to work, you might have the semblance of a point. Why not go away and come back then?
Click to expand...

Knowing him he'll still be posting about it 4 years from now but he'll ignore the development it has had in that time and STILL be posting the same youtube video and ignoring all replies.
 
FatFreddy88 said:
Here's a new hoax video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-r_lcGBdPPw
Click to expand...

What do you think of that video? I thought it was a foolish attempt by a uneducated misinformed person who has an ax to grind.

The first error is right at the beginning. None of the flights went off without a hitch. Proof in the video it was moved by a crane? None of course.

0:46 Compares the LEM to the DCXA. They are no where near the same. The LEM was a one time use spacecraft. It landed then took off in a vacuum once. the DCXA was an aircraft that took off, traveled in the atmosphere then landed vertically. It did this four times, crashing and burning up on the last landing.

1:30 Morpheus tests. Shows failures. This is why they est so they can make them work later on.

Turns out the proof in the video is the text written by the person making this video. "It is because i say it is" It looks like this is the new standard of proof for the Moon Hoax believers. I call it a new low. :)

Ranb
 
What do you think of that video?
Click to expand...
It's not proof of a hoax in and of itself, but it's circumstantial evidence that points in the direction of a hoax. Anyway, the hoax has already been proven. I posted a partial summary of hoax proof in a thread in the "Club" section of the SpursTalk forum that you can check out. The fact that what that video shows is only circumstantial evidence doesn't make the rest of the hoax proof go away.
 
They do not seem to be buying it over on SpursTalk either. Your claims are the same old worn out ones that have been trashed everywhere else.

Can you point to actual evidence that the landings were faked?

Ranb
 
FatFreddy88 said:
It's not proof of a hoax in and of itself, but it's circumstantial evidence that points in the direction of a hoax. Anyway, the hoax has already been proven. I posted a partial summary of hoax proof in a thread in the "Club" section of the SpursTalk forum that you can check out. The fact that what that video shows is only circumstantial evidence doesn't make the rest of the hoax proof go away.
Click to expand...

It points actually nowhere other than a waste of good bandwidth
 
FatFreddy88 said:
It's not proof of a hoax in and of itself, but it's circumstantial evidence that points in the direction of a hoax.
Click to expand...

It is not circumstantial evidence at all. It is a good indicator that you know zilch about engineering and development. They've just begun to test this, and that is the prototype. They have already isolated the problem.

Anyway, the hoax has already been proven.
Click to expand...

Get out of it! You have proven nothing, and ignore clear evidence that suggests otherwise. Your reply to the Apollo samples is to spam Jarrah White's moronic uninformed videos and say it is "plausible" they were faked, when every single geologist that has ever examined them says otherwise. Then to get around that, you suggest the ridiculous "they have been got at":boggled:

I posted a partial summary of hoax proof in a thread in the "Club" section of the SpursTalk forum that you can check out.
Click to expand...

You seem proud of your spamming enterprise. From the odd trips to that forum, it doesn't appear that you are held in high esteem there.

The fact that what that video shows is only circumstantial evidence doesn't make the rest of the hoax proof go away.
Click to expand...

Nothing will make it go away from your head, but it has gone away. Only very narrow minded or hopelessly uninformed wooo theorists believe this rubbish.

I believe somebody has taken you to task by answering your whole spam posts, with two videos showing your quest to forum spam the entire internet, and a point by point rebuttal to you. Your only reply is to use another moronic conspiracy theory(Chinese spacewalk) as an ad hominem and a totally crazy "credibility test" on it. A test that fails by its own crieria, since the maker of your main evidence video is a pro-Apollo person. Epic of epic fails.

One of the downsides for you of linking to other forums, is the links and tidbits it throws up, such as this...

http://debunking-a-moron.blogspot.co.uk/

I'm surprised you even have the audacity to carry on posting after given such a public spanking:boxedin:
 
FatFreddy88/DavidC/rocky/cosmored/etc., I see you are actually looking at responses in this thread. You are not engaging with the posters in any meaningful sense - you are simpy giving the usual brain-dead cliches and echoing your link-spam - but you are looking at this thread, so please don't think that you can pretend you're not, and that you can continue to dodge

your dishonesty in your Magic Sand claims, and avoiding the rebuttals thereto, and

the fact that according to your criteria, you are only pretending to mean what you say, you hypocrite.

I repeat: you can hide from it like any other anonymous coward, but you will continue to be called in it.
 
FatFreddy88 said:
I don't fault Armstrong for having participated in the fakery; for all we know, he might have been under some kind of pressure. Anyway, the proof that the missions were faked is crushing and anybody who sees it and still maintains they were real is in denial.
Click to expand...

You mean, the crushing evidence like stars not appearing on moon pictures because of under-exposure, white bleeding on pictures of the rover, people mistaking the Van Halen radiation belt for something far more dangerous than it really is, and misinterpretation of pictures ?

That doesn't sound very solid to me, but I'm willing to be proven wrong. After all, conspiracies are so exciting, yes ?

So, what's the most convincing piece of evidence, in your opinion, to the effect that the moon landing was faked ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom