Merged Apollo "hoax" discussion / Lick observatory laser saga

[dafydd]

Supposing ( by a gargantuan leap of the imagination) that the Moon landings were proven to be faked. What difference would it make now?

 

[dafydd]

FF88 is probably high fiving himself in the mirror because he's got us 'rattled'. You can never forget that concepts such as decency and compassion are alien to the CT crowd.

''Rattled'' is not the right word.

 

[drewid]

''Rattled'' is not the right word.

"Bothered"? No still too strong.

 

[mrbusdriver]

I feel soiled just reading FF's posts...ick..

 

[R.A.F.]

I don't fault Armstrong for having participated in the fakery....

Since the landings were not faked, your statement is delusional.

...for all we know, he might have been under some kind of pressure.

No one is interested in what you "make up".

...the proof that the missions were faked is crushing and anybody who sees it and still maintains they were real is in denial.

Nope, nope, and nope....saying the same old crap doesn't make it any less a lie.

The landings happened, and nothing you have presented has changed anyone's mind.

You've failed miserabily, FF, in very way.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8033032&postcount=1

How many times must you be warned not to link to other posts?....or I guess the question should be, how many times will you ignore moderator instructions before you are banned.

 

[Garrison]

''Rattled'' is not the right word.

Hence why rattled is in quotes, CT's always overestimate the effect of their nonsense.

 

[dafydd]

Hence why rattled is in quotes, CT's always overestimate the effect of their nonsense.

They do seem to have a hugely over inflated view of their effect on the rest of the world.

 

[twinstead]

Moon hoax believers are just the cutest things EVER

 

[Multivac]

I don't fault Armstrong for having participated in the fakery; for all we know, he might have been under some kind of pressure. Anyway, the proof that the missions were faked is crushing non-existent and anybody who sees it and still maintains they were real is in denial touch with reality.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8033032&postcount=1

Fixed that for you. Hope you don't mind.

 

[Tony99]

I don't fault Armstrong for having participated in the fakery; for all we know, he might have been under some kind of pressure. Anyway, the proof that the missions were faked is crushing and anybody who sees it and still maintains they were real is in denial.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8033032&postcount=1

Freddy, shhhhhhh.... the grown ups are talking.

 

[EHocking]

Moon hoax believers are just the cutest things EVER

In the same way that a toddler smearing itself with its own faeces is "cute"....

 

[jaydeehess]

Yes, we all know about the invisible Jewish pixies who will twist your balls if you step out of line.

and the invisible woodland pixies that will tickle said appendages when you speak nicely to them.

wait, maybe I dreamed that

 

[jaydeehess]

Hence why rattled is in quotes, CT's always overestimate the effect of their nonsense.

When one rarely leaves their Mom's basement Command Centre and spends most of their time posting on forums, facebook and Twitter one can get an inflated view of their importance to the world I would suppose.

 

[Skeptic Guy]

Proof of a faked Moon landing should never be followed by a Youtube video. That never works out.

 

[timhau]

Proof of a faked Moon landing should never be followed by a Youtube video. That never works out.

In other words, it works just as well as any other proof of a faked Moon landing.

 

[nomuse]

In other words, it works just as well as any other proof of a faked Moon landing.

Better. It is more annoying, and takes longer to get to the point. You get a lot more troll for your buck with YouTube in the loop.

 

[Stamuel]

I had been reading this thread until it went dead earlier this month. When Armstrong died, it momentarily occurred to me that some nutter might use it as an occasion to revive the thread. I immediately dismissed the idea, because even they would not be so low. Now I see I was wrong. It surprises me how often I overestimate CTers.

 

[Hans]

I had been reading this thread until it went dead earlier this month. When Armstrong died, it momentarily occurred to me that some nutter might use it as an occasion to revive the thread. I immediately dismissed the idea, because even they would not be so low. Now I see I was wrong. It surprises me how often I overestimate CTers.

Never underestimate the more trollish of CT'ers, they've written up a different set of social rules

 

[FatFreddy88]

Here's a new hoax video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-r_lcGBdPPw

 

[Straw Man]

Here's a new hoax video. some more YT spam

ftfy