Vaccine/autism CT discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, but I want it to be able to land still operable and with me uninjured. I'm kind of picky that way.

Need some help with those goalposts? I can refer you to someone with a *lot* of experience moving them...:boxedin:
 
Perhaps Clayton didn't understand "valid and verifiable" evidence. An awful lot of news articles are hardly a substitute for a single study or peer review article. Where is the remotest hint of a incident rate to be concerned about? Some people react baddly to a treatment of some description? Shocker! Just the same as any medicine ever.

Same old same old of the "I don't understand it, I can't be bothered to find out, it must be bad" kind of argument.

I'm pretty sure you've got the logic backward. "It must be bad, so I can't find out more and am unable to really understand it."
 
This looks like a classic example of conspiracy theorists pissing in the pool of public discourse. From what I can see of ALEC, it's a rather concerning organisation, in that it gives large corporations excessive influence on a lawmaking process that's supposed to reflect the democratic will of the population. But as soon as conspiracy theorists get a hold of it, they start tacking absurd antivax nonsense on to it, and end up making it look like anyone who expresses any legitimate concern is a nutjob. If anybody were paying attention to them, it might be quite a serious problem.

Dave
 
Gardasil-A-Case-of-Contamination

http://www.scribd.com/doc/82339484/Part-I-Gardasil-A-Case-of-Contamination

Part I: A Case of Contamination:
Growing Concern over the Safety and Efficacy of Merck's Gardasil HPV VaccineBy Gary Null and Jeremy StillmanSeptember 16, 2011
Recent reports on Gardasil points to a frightening cover-up by Merck, American medicalauthorities, and the media regarding the harmful nature of the popular HPV vaccine.The controversy stems from one small phrase that appeared on the package insert of Merck’sGardasil vaccine since it hit the market in 2006. It read:“GARDASIL is not a live virus vaccine; it contains no viral DNA and is thereforeincapable of causing infection”
1
This assertion was given a stamp of approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and backed by major medical institutions including Health Canada and the World HealthOrganization (WHO).
23
The results of a recent study commissioned by the vaccine safety organization SANE Vax provide compelling evidence that the Gardasil vaccine does, in fact, contain dangerous livestrains of the HPV virus. The study examined the contents of thirteen vials of Gardasil fromdifferent countries around the world including the United States. It was found that 100% of thevaccines probed were contaminated with genetically modified HPV DNA,

OMG

The article fails to reference the comprehensive body of researchand documentation which proves that Bachmann was far from overstating the facts.FDA documents obtained by Judicial Watch reveal that, within a 16 month period, there were 16deaths (4 suicides), 789 “serious reports” and 239 cases of permanent disability resulting fromthe vaccine. As of April 2011, over 20,000 adverse events, 90 of them deaths, have beenreported to the government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in connectionwith the vaccine
1718
It is estimated that only between 1%-10% of all adverse reactions arereported to VAERS.
 
Last edited:
And yet of the 23 million vaccinations done by 2008 there were just under 12,500 adverse reactions according to an AMA study.

For the math challenged that is a 0.0054% of getting an adverse reaction.
 
And yet of the 23 million vaccinations done by 2008 there were just under 12,500 adverse reactions according to an AMA study.

For the math challenged that is a 0.0054% of getting an adverse reaction.

FDA documents obtained by Judicial Watch reveal that, within a 16 month period, there were 16deaths (4 suicides), 789 “serious reports” and 239 cases of permanent disability resulting fromthe vaccine. As of April 2011, over 20,000 adverse events, 90 of them deaths, have beenreported to the government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in connectionwith the vaccine

That would put your adverse reactions at a negative 7,500 making your 0.0054% even lower. Good work.
 
Border Reiver said:
And yet of the 23 million vaccinations done by 2008 there were just under 12,500 adverse reactions according to an AMA study.

For the math challenged that is a 0.0054% of getting an adverse reaction.

FDA documents obtained by Judicial Watch reveal that, within a 16 month period, there were 16deaths (4 suicides), 789 “serious reports” and 239 cases of permanent disability resulting fromthe vaccine. As of April 2011, over 20,000 adverse events, 90 of them deaths, have beenreported to the government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in connectionwith the vaccine

That would put your adverse reactions at a negative 7,500 making your 0.0054% even lower. Good work.

Spot the difference? Don't you read, Clayton?
 
That would put your adverse reactions at a negative 7,500 making your 0.0054% even lower. Good work.

Is there a particular reason you're trying to disguise the fact that you are still citing Null, a person with no known credentials in this field?

BAD doggie.
 
Last edited:
Straw Man said:
Border Reiver said:
And yet of the 23 million vaccinations done by 2008 there were just under 12,500 adverse reactions according to an AMA study.

For the math challenged that is a 0.0054% of getting an adverse reaction.

FDA documents obtained by Judicial Watch reveal that, within a 16 month period, there were 16deaths (4 suicides), 789 “serious reports” and 239 cases of permanent disability resulting fromthe vaccine. As of April 2011, over 20,000 adverse events, 90 of them deaths, have beenreported to the government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in connectionwith the vaccine

That would put your adverse reactions at a negative 7,500 making your 0.0054% even lower. Good work.

Spot the difference? Don't you read, Clayton?
Classic! :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom