• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Continuation: Discussion of the George Zimmerman case

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think the Conservative Treehouse has reached a new low. Not just because they released her name, whether rape victims should be named is a complex issue. Rather because they not only name her but immediately start attempting to trash her and creating anger towards her. And evidently naming her wasn't enough, they had to post 4 different pictures of her. I have to wonder if anyone is feeding them info, they sure did get a post up on this quick with her name and several pics.
 
This is for the Zimmerman case: http://twitter.com/GZlegalCase

I don't see it there either.
Here it is. http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/07/16/2897557/zimmerman-defense-attorney-will.html

“It’s completely irrelevant, and now we will have to waste 50 hours on something that will never make it to a courtroom,” he told The Miami Herald Monday night. “He denies it. He is saying that it never happened.”

O’Mara said he’s now put in the position of having to discredit the woman, by pointing out things like that she tried to sell her story to People magazine.
 
You have evidence Zimmerman was sexually abused?

Anyone else corroborate W9's story? The sister? The mother? Anyone?
Not yet in the media, however she claims she told her family and that they confronted him at a restaurant and he said "I'm sorry" and walked out. If that's true she should certainly have corroboration on that.
 
Here's a strange quote from the Miami Herald story:
"....Fluent in Spanish, in one call he lamented to his sister that their parents did not give him a proper Hispanic name like “Jorge.” If America had understood he was Latino, the entire ugly affair over the shooting death of Trayvon Martin could have been avoided, he said....."

So GZ thinks nobody would care if a Hispanic shot and killed an unarmed black teenager? Or a Hispanic would never do it except in extreme self-defense? Or the criminal justice system is more lenient with Hispanics than whites(!)? Or people would assume it was some kind of gang turf war? Or what? Does "Jorge" really think he's in jail because people think he's white?
http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/07/16/2897557/zimmerman-defense-attorney-will.html
 
I think she means that this evidence should not come into the case about shooting Trayvon Martin, and I agree.

But NBS's statemant was:

"Because it serves no purpose whatsoever except to pollute the jury pool."

I was pointing out that the whole world does not revolve around this one case.

There is a purpose for coming out, and that is to arrest the person that sexually molested her during her entire childhood.

Saying she shouldn't do that just because it would pollute the jury pool in this case is asinine.
 
But NBS's statemant was:

"Because it serves no purpose whatsoever except to pollute the jury pool."

I was pointing out that the whole world does not revolve around this one case.

There is a purpose for coming out, and that is to arrest the person that sexually molested her during her entire childhood.

Saying she shouldn't do that just because it would pollute the jury pool in this case is asinine.

Agreed.
 
Yeah, those 7 year olds and their raging hormones... :boggled:

WildCat is #1: on record as saying that 7 year olds have no sexual desires and therefore cannot be molesters.

WildCat is #2: Completely ignoring the fact that the molestation continued until one or more of the two were adults.
 
I think the Conservative Treehouse has reached a new low. Not just because they released her name, whether rape victims should be named is a complex issue. Rather because they not only name her but immediately start attempting to trash her and creating anger towards her. And evidently naming her wasn't enough, they had to post 4 different pictures of her. I have to wonder if anyone is feeding them info, they sure did get a post up on this quick with her name and several pics.

But all those pictures establish is that she's cute, has a responsible job, a good looking husband, and an adorable bub.

Good luck trashing her with that. Doesn't feed the meme of angry resentful woman trying to blame "Jorge" for her lousy life.
 
Here's a strange quote from the Miami Herald story:


So GZ thinks nobody would care if a Hispanic shot and killed an unarmed black teenager? Or a Hispanic would never do it except in extreme self-defense? Or the criminal justice system is more lenient with Hispanics than whites(!)? Or people would assume it was some kind of gang turf war? Or what? Does "Jorge" really think he's in jail because people think he's white?
http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/07/16/2897557/zimmerman-defense-attorney-will.html
Apparently he hasn't been reading this forum...

Or he would know that Hispanics are mostly 'gangbangers'... :D
 
Last edited:
Here's a strange quote from the Miami Herald story:
"....Fluent in Spanish, in one call he lamented to his sister that their parents did not give him a proper Hispanic name like “Jorge.” If America had understood he was Latino, the entire ugly affair over the shooting death of Trayvon Martin could have been avoided, he said....."

So GZ thinks nobody would care if a Hispanic shot and killed an unarmed black teenager? Or a Hispanic would never do it except in extreme self-defense? Or the criminal justice system is more lenient with Hispanics than whites(!)? Or people would assume it was some kind of gang turf war? Or what? Does "Jorge" really think he's in jail because people think he's white?
http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/07/16/2897557/zimmerman-defense-attorney-will.html


Yeah that quote really doesn't make much sense. It is just another of dozens of examples that show Z's deranged thinking.
 
Judge Lester's cleaning out his Zimmerman file:

Notice of Filing

From that pdf.

As far as I can tell this is the list of things Z spent PayPal donations on while still hiding the PayPal money from the court up until the point O'Mara made him transfer it to the trust fund.

I assume it all ads up to around $25,000 which is the Total ($177,790) minus the Trust Fund Check ($122, 790) minus the Cash ($20,000) minus the Bond ($5,000). I didn't add it all up to see if it is equal to, or close to, $25,000.

Some interesting things. At least 5 seperate credit cards with multiple payments on most of them.

Let's just say I would have not spent $25k like this, no matter where I got it.

Code:
$177,790

$122,393 Trust Fund Check
 $20,000 Cash
  $5,000 Bond
    $409 Cash from ATM for miscellaneous expenses
    $705 Food
    $520 Clothing
    $120 Dr. Co-Pays
    $600 New cell phones
    $600 Prepaid phone calls from Jail
    $800 Gasoline
    $130 RX Medicines
  $1,525 Rental Cars
     $90 Salon
  $3,961 AMEX
    $500 Hotel
    $800 Jail Commissary
    $200 WiFi Hotspot
    $170 Hotspot service fee
  $1,300 AT&T WiFi Service (24 month contract)
  $2,500 LandLine Installation (2,600 feet)
    $600 12 Months Verizon service
     $60 Strong VPN
    $600 Groceries
    $400 Dog care
    $300 Fedex
    $400 Airfare
    $439 Sam's Club Credit Card
    $167 T-mobile
    $256 Target Credit Card
    $455 Capital One Auto Loan
    $358 Capital One Auto Loan
    $113 Capital One Credit Card
    $950 Rent
     $33 Electric
  $1,500 AMEX
     $50 Brighthouse
    $500 Capital One Auto Loan
    $500 Capital One Auto Loan
    $240 Vehicle Maintenance
    $500 Capital One Credit Card
    $150 City of Sanford Water
    $250 First Premier Credit Card
    $150 Progress Energy
    $500 Sam's Club
    $300 T-mobile
    $200 Target
    $200 Walmart
    $600 Cypress (Renter's Insurance)
    $950 Rent
    $500 Loan re-payment
    $250 Chase Credit Card
  $3,000 Loan re-payment
 
But NBS's statemant was:

"Because it serves no purpose whatsoever except to pollute the jury pool."

I was pointing out that the whole world does not revolve around this one case.

There is a purpose for coming out, and that is to arrest the person that sexually molested her during her entire childhood.

Saying she shouldn't do that just because it would pollute the jury pool in this case is asinine.

Nobody said she shouldn't have reported it. The entire conversation is about it being released with the rest of the evidence. That is a complete and utter strawman!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom