"Why Does The Mainstream Media Ignore The Bilderberg Group?" (Article)

[JayUtah]

Er, Jay, I don't think you meant to reply to me. I quite agree that claims of a nefarious Bilderberg group need to be backed up by evidence. That was to be my next point, although it won't be needed because Dazed said 'no' to my question.

Right; sorry. The attribution is inappropriate. No offense intended.

 

[JayUtah]

S'alright - apparently the contingency plans drawn up by military planners in 1921 (Canada) and in 1930 (US) are signs that both countries are prepared to wage war against each other at an instant's notice.

We greatly fear the Royal Canadian Kilted Yaksmen.

 

[Border Reiver]

We greatly fear the Royal Canadian Kilted Yaksmen.

As well you should.

We do.

 

[beren]

Did we really just get aRen and Stimpy reference?

 

[JayUtah]

Did we really just get aRen and Stimpy reference?

Well I've already been accused of Godwin's Law for a reference to gay unicorns flying out of Hitler's butt. I'm really not sure where I'm supposed to go after that.

 

[Border Reiver]

The Royal Canadian Air Farce to borrow the Chicken Cannon.

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

I think this calls for an objectivity test. Do you people think the US is the good guys in the world?

What the hell is this; a subjective test of objectivity?

 

[JayUtah]

What the hell is this; a subjective test of objectivity?

Yes. Unabashedly so. FatFreddy's definition of "objective" is literally "agrees with me."

For another example, go back to the Apollo thread, far down the page now, you'll see a link back to the old (now read-only) Apollo Hoax thread where the precipitating event for his banning from that forum was his insistence that he would consider "honest" only those people who agreed that 9/11 was an inside job. If you didn't accept that 9/11 was an inside job, then you were a paid to be a liar and a government shill, and nothing you said on the topic of space engineering could be considered worth paying attention to.

In other words, his arguments here, there, and everywhere are nothing more than an elaborate ad hominem. Don't waste your time; he doesn't know how else to argue.

 

[Inside Mob]

What the hell is this; a subjective test of objectivity?

Good catch I didn't notice it. The thought process must be like a Möbius strip made out of corkscrews.

 

[FatFreddy88]

You people seem to be caught between a rock and a hard place on this issue of American Imperialism. You know that the US is an imperialist power but you can't say so because it's your job to defend the official US government position on everything. You also can't say it isn't an imperialist power because it obviously is (see my last post). All you can do is tap dance around until the issue blows over and then go on as if nothing had happened. You can pretend all you want but your refusal to address this issue totally destroys your credibility.

People who maintain that the Bilderberg group is harmless usually also maintain that the US isn't an imperialist power and are therefore either extremely naive, or disinfo agents. People who maintain that the Bilderberg group is what the alternative press says it is usually correctly say that the US is an imperialist power which is a sign that they are objective and should be taken seriously.

Google "Michel Chossudovsky Bilderberg" to see what the Alternative press says.

 

[uke2se]

You people seem to be caught between a rock and a hard place on this issue of American Imperialism. You know that the US is an imperialist power but you can't say so because it's your job to defend the official US government position on everything. You also can't say it isn't an imperialist power because it obviously is (see my last post). All you can do is tap dance around until the issue blows over and then go on as if nothing had happened. You can pretend all you want but your refusal to address this issue totally destroys your credibility.

People who maintain that the Bilderberg group is harmless usually also maintain that the US isn't an imperialist power and are therefore either extremely naive, or disinfo agents. People who maintain that the Bilderberg group is what the alternative press says it is usually correctly say that the US is an imperialist power which is a sign that they are objective and should be taken seriously.

Google "Michel Chossudovsky Bilderberg" to see what the Alternative press says.

I'm going to crush your conspiracy theory about us:

The US isn't an imperialist power. For actual imperialist powers, see the Commonwealth, the French, Dutch, Belgian and German empires of the last and second to last centuries.

Now what are you going to believe about us?

By the way, what does the '88' part in your username stand for?

ETA: By the way, I'm not American.

 

[squealpiggy]

You people seem to be caught between a rock and a hard place on this issue of American Imperialism. You know that the US is an imperialist power but you can't say so because it's your job to defend the official US government position on everything. You also can't say it isn't an imperialist power because it obviously is (see my last post). All you can do is tap dance around until the issue blows over and then go on as if nothing had happened. You can pretend all you want but your refusal to address this issue totally destroys your credibility.

I don't know if you're the right person to ask but could you let me know how I can sign up to receive some of this US government money? I mean I do this out of general interest but I could be sitting on a goldmine here!

People who maintain that the Bilderberg group is harmless usually also maintain that the US isn't an imperialist power and are therefore either extremely naive, or disinfo agents. People who maintain that the Bilderberg group is what the alternative press says it is usually correctly say that the US is an imperialist power which is a sign that they are objective and should be taken seriously.

Only in an Irish dictionary?

Google "Michel Chossudovsky Bilderberg" to see what the Alternative press says.

First hit on google is this thread.

 

[dafydd]

You people seem to be caught between a rock and a hard place on this issue of American Imperialism. You know that the US is an imperialist power but you can't say so because it's your job to defend the official US government position on everything. You also can't say it isn't an imperialist power because it obviously is (see my last post). All you can do is tap dance around until the issue blows over and then go on as if nothing had happened. You can pretend all you want but your refusal to address this issue totally destroys your credibility.

People who maintain that the Bilderberg group is harmless usually also maintain that the US isn't an imperialist power and are therefore either extremely naive, or disinfo agents. People who maintain that the Bilderberg group is what the alternative press says it is usually correctly say that the US is an imperialist power which is a sign that they are objective and should be taken seriously.

Google "Michel Chossudovsky Bilderberg" to see what the Alternative press says.

I'm Welsh. You know, from Wales. You can find it on a map. Why would it be my job to defend the American government? If the job pays well can you put me in touch with somebody?

 

[FatFreddy88]

I'm going to crush your conspiracy theory about us:

The US isn't an imperialist power. For actual imperialist powers, see the Commonwealth, the French, Dutch, Belgian and German empires of the last and second to last centuries.

I don't see how citing other imperialist powers proves that the US isn't an imperialist power. Tell us what you think of this info that I already posted.

http://www.fas.org/man/smedley.htm
http://mtwsfh.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0JCJ4pIFEw

 

[uke2se]

I don't see how citing other imperialist powers proves that the US isn't an imperialist power.

I am not surprised that you don't see that. Reasoning isn't your strong point after all.

Tell us what you think of this info that I already posted.

[links snipped]

The first one is an opinion if at all correct. The second one is a conspiracy tard site. The third one is a youtube video. That's what I think.

Now, you didn't answer: What does the '88' part of your username stand for?

 

[dafydd]

I don't see how citing other imperialist powers proves that the US isn't an imperialist power. Tell us what you think of this info that I already posted.

http://www.fas.org/man/smedley.htm
http://mtwsfh.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0JCJ4pIFEw

Disinfo.

 

[JayUtah]

People who maintain that the Bilderberg group is harmless usually also maintain that the US isn't an imperialist power and are therefore either extremely naive, or disinfo agents.

This is the only argument he ever makes. Don't waste your time.

 

[jaydeehess]

Yes, what was the the nefarious plan that was hatched? It was so important that every reporter in the USA was duped into boarding a plane. Has this plan come to fruition, CE?

It means that Obama (and Hillary) were willing to risk a minor scandal and a pissed press corp to arrange their secret appearance at the meeting in a busy pre-election period. Didn't hurt them, did it?

CE, this would, on the face of it, completely destroy the assumptions of the OP.
Perhaps someone else has noticed, I haven't caught up with this thread fully.

IF the MAIN STREAM PRESS was fed a false story to have them not be available to cover the BG meeting which may or may not have been attended by Obama and H.Clinton, then it would illustrate that the MSM is NOT ignoring the BG. It would indicate, if this is as reported by those who fear the BG and its agenda tell us, that the media HAD to be sent away in order to t have them not pay attention to the BG.


So which is it, the media pays so much attention to the BG that they are interfered with in the performance of their jobs, OR, the media is controlled so much by those with ties to the BG that the media "Ignores" the BG?

They are diametrically opposed positions, pick one (1) (uno, une, ein)

 

[jaydeehess]

Y
He bases all of his analyses on the idea that the US is the "Bad guys" in the world which is correct. People who play down the Bilderberg group are usually people who base all of their opinions on the idea that the US supports freedom and democracy in the world.

I think this calls for an objectivity test. Do you people think the US is the good guys in the world? I'd especially like to hear from Jay Windley. Here's some alternative info on the subject.

Please then look up the definition of "objectivity" as it does not included having a prejudice,

 

[jaydeehess]

We greatly fear the Royal Canadian Kilted Yaksmen.

As well you should.

We do.

A squad of them went through town about 9 months ago. Children were whisked off the streets and fathers and mothers who did not ensure that their daughters were locked safely in their rooms are paying for their inattention now.

In WW2 a scouting party of the RCKY came upon an entire regiment of SS quite unexpectedly (on both sides).

the the ensuing battle saw the loss of one Canadian who was slow to lower his kilt. The SS suffered 99.99% causualties. The lone German to survive only began to look up as the rest of the Canadians lowered their kilts thus he was not mesmerized by the awe inspiring sight of a RCKY 'going regimental'. It was he that took out that lone Canadian as his compatriots were mown down.

true story..........