• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

"Why Does The Mainstream Media Ignore The Bilderberg Group?" (Article)

I just watched the video. Senator Obama? This is from 4 years ago. What does that have to do with anything?
 
In 2008 Bilderberg met at the same hotel in Virginia. Maybe next read what Dazed wrote.

Still havent watched the video eh?

Here let me do your homework for you:
It's a CNN camera recording a plane full of news reporters being held captive and flown to Chicago after being tricked into thinking the presidential candidates would be on the plane, but they were really attending the bilderberg meeting, and the whole thing was an elaborate ruse to incapacitate and deceive all the news reporters so the candidates could attend the bilderberg meetings unmolested by national scrutiny.


OK. Let's assume that Senator Obama attended the Bilderberg meeting in 2008, and that reporters were duped into flying back to Chicago without him. Robert "has a passing familiarity with the truth" Gibbs lied to them.

So what? What evil plans were hatched, and how did they mess up our world? And how is "being fooled into flying on a plane without a Senator" equal to "ignoring the Bilderberg Group?"
 
OK. Let's assume that Senator Obama attended the Bilderberg meeting in 2008, and that reporters were duped into flying back to Chicago without him. Robert "has a passing familiarity with the truth" Gibbs lied to them.

So what? What evil plans were hatched, and how did they mess up our world? And how is "being fooled into flying on a plane without a Senator" equal to "ignoring the Bilderberg Group?"

Yes, what was the the nefarious plan that was hatched? It was so important that every reporter in the USA was duped into boarding a plane. Has this plan come to fruition, CE?
 
So what? What evil plans were hatched, and how did they mess up our world? And how is "being fooled into flying on a plane without a Senator" equal to "ignoring the Bilderberg Group?"


It means that Obama (and Hillary) were willing to risk a minor scandal and a pissed press corp to arrange their secret appearance at the meeting in a busy pre-election period. Didn't hurt them, did it?
 
It means that Obama (and Hillary) were willing to risk a minor scandal and a pissed press corp to arrange their secret appearance at the meeting in a busy pre-election period. Didn't hurt them, did it?

I guess not. Is there a Conspiracy Theory involved, or are we now off-topic?
 
It means that Obama (and Hillary) were willing to risk a minor scandal and a pissed press corp to arrange their secret appearance at the meeting in a busy pre-election period. Didn't hurt them, did it?

How did they keep the reporters that were not on the plane away?
This is hilarious
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2008/060608_hillary_obama.htm
A secret meeting that everyone knew about.

''He that would keep a secret must keep it a secret that he has a secret to keep''- Sir Humphrey Appleby

I missed the bit in your post about the evil plans that were discussed.
 
Readers, look how carlitos goes from

And insane claims like this are why we don't pay attention to that person.


to

I guess not. Is there a Conspiracy Theory involved, or are we now off-topic?


in a couple of posts after he was shown that those "insane claims" are completely true. But so what, eh? Nothing to see here.

This kind of intellectually dishonest behaviour is why nobody wants to join the gang in their hilarious ritual straw men burning. Can't blaim Dazed that he lost interest.

Have fun!
 
Readers, look how carlitos goes from




to




in a couple of posts after he was shown that those "insane claims" are completely true. But so what, eh? Nothing to see here.

This kind of intellectually dishonest behaviour is why nobody wants to join the gang in their hilarious ritual straw men burning. Can't blaim Dazed that he lost interest.

Have fun!

I was wrong. I apologize. Based on that poster's history of insane claims (my characterization of him was accurate, yet labeled "ad hominem" by someone here), I assumed that an alex jones-sourced youtube would contain an "insane claim." Based on his body of work, that was a safe bet.

Again, my apologies to all involved.

Now, what's the conspiracy here?

ETA - is there any proof that they did attend the meeting? I don't remember hearing this at the time.
 
Last edited:
Readers, look how carlitos goes from




to




in a couple of posts after he was shown that those "insane claims" are completely true. But so what, eh? Nothing to see here.

This kind of intellectually dishonest behaviour is why nobody wants to join the gang in their hilarious ritual straw men burning. Can't blaim Dazed that he lost interest.

Have fun!

I missed those posts too. Or are you referring to posts that accused them of meeting? Dazed didn't lose interest, all of his points were well and truly trashed, such as the one about all the world hating Bill Gates.
 
Last edited:
in a couple of posts after he was shown that those "insane claims" are completely true.

Nonsense. I pushed his own words under his nose several times before he would even address them, and when he did it was only to blabber about his interpretation of "human nature." If you go back to his original posts that I responded to, he didn't waver from that begged question one whit through the entire discussion.

This kind of intellectually dishonest behaviour is why nobody wants to join the gang in their hilarious ritual straw men burning. Can't blaim Dazed that he lost interest.

Spare me. His very first post in this thread assumed we would gloat when he was eventually banned for his beliefs. And in almost every post thereafter, Dazed tried to paint himself as a long-suffering victim, despite the fact that all he was being asked to do was explain why he thought we should all believe as he did. He finally admitted he had no evidence, but that it was all just his hunch.

He lost interest because his blatant self-flagellation was rather quickly seen through, thus depriving him of his troll payoff. He manufactures himself to be a martyr for a pointless cause, and you seem to be falling for that nonsense.
 
He lost interest because his blatant self-flagellation was rather quickly seen through, thus depriving him of his troll payoff. He manufactures himself to be a martyr for a pointless cause, and you seem to be falling for that nonsense.

The poor CTists, all they have are cardboard heroes.
 
So Obama wanted to see the Bilderberg group and decided the best way to do that was to annoy all the reporters that were covering his campaign? So where are their reports denouncing this dirty trick?
 
So Obama wanted to see the Bilderberg group and decided the best way to do that was to annoy all the reporters that were covering his campaign? So where are their reports denouncing this dirty trick?

An extensive Google search reveals no reports. What better way to cover up a secret meeting than to kidnap all the reporters who were on the way to the meeting. Don't CTists ever think things through?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom