• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC7 and the girder walk-off between column 79 and 44

Status
Not open for further replies.
No, I posted the link.

Like I said, your imagination only works in one direction so you cannot imagine how a hands free column cutting device could be developed.

The scientists at Komatsu are very intelligent people with all the funding they need and they were not the only people developing nano-thermite demolition devices. The military, with unlimited funding, was also working on ways to use nano-thermite to blow things up and bring structures down.

There's your problem right there. The military does not have unlimited funding. The government does not have unlimited funding. They have resources and they have competing priorities like everyone else. An appeal to military magic is not going to cut it in this thread. Prove the use of such a device using the evidence at hand or accept the fact that there were no hush-a-booms in any of the World Trade Center buildings.
 
You are reading it as if thermite is more powerful than already existing weapons or explosives. Learn what the word "add" means.

The material you are describing has never been found at ground zero. If you believe Harrit et al = super nano-thermite added to a weapon then do so using the data in the Harrit et al paper.

I know you can't because I know exactly what Harrit et al examined. Epoxy with kaolin and haematite pigment particles otherwise known as paint.

Hiding behind "the military have super seekrit weapons that can do anything I can imagine" just doesn't cut the mustard. There is nothing special about thermite. There's nothing special about nano-sized particles. There is nothing secret about adding such materials to explosives to create new materials for weapons.
A list of denial. [insults deleted]
 
You were hiding that this "apparatus" was a welding torch.
I'm PMSL. Truthers are just 100% pure entertainment.

Imagine what it would take to set this device up to cut a column.

Gas bottle.
Hose connecting gas bottle to device.
Container with thermite in.
Hose to connect thermite to device.
Some form of mixer to mix the two.
Valves for control of flow rates for both.
Some form of stanchion that not only holds the torch but allows it to rotate in a horizontal plane.
Ignition source to ignite the gas.
Control system to do all of this remotely without a human present.
Power supply for all the above.

I'm sure there are more.

Can you imagine dozens if not hundreds of these devices being set up in office buildings that are occupied. How the hell are you going to hide all the gas bottles?

It's ludicrous. Although highly amusing. It's great when truthers google and just pick some random paper or patent and then just quote the bits that they think support their view.

It's like small children who think that if they cover their eyes you can't see them. Hey truthers, we can follow links and read them too!
 
Last edited:
Look, a prediction:
I know you won't answer these questions.

Look, it came true! C7 ignored questions!
Dayum, what a clever lad he is! He always knows which questions to avoid!

Maybe he thinks I would forget? Hmmm.


Alrighty, Christopher, care to answer a few:

...
"It can't be because there's no boom boom" is a thread bear canard that assumes you know all ther is to know about nano-thermite. You don't.
...

Got a few more questions for you:
  1. Richard Gage claims publicly that WTC7 was brought down by explosive demolition. Is that true or not true (that Gage makes that claim)?
  2. Do you agree with Richard Gage that WTC7 was brought down by explosive demolition?
  3. Do explosions exist that don't go BOOM, yes or no?
  4. What property of explosions is it, by the way, that severs structural steel? The heat, the volume increase, or the shockwave?
  5. Do quiet explosions have the ability to cut or break structural steel? Yes or No?

I know you won't answer these questions. You never do. So let me give the answers for you:
  1. Yes, Richard Gage makes that claim. Most recently about 2 weeks ago at the press conference that kicked of his current tour.
  2. You have no idea what you are supposed to believe
  3. No, such explosions do not exist
  4. It's the shockwave that cuts the steel.
  5. No, quiet explosions can't do that. The shockwave comes from the application of high velocity explosives (much higher than the reaction speed in nano-thermite), and of course it must have a sufficiently high amplitudel The very same shockwave is what creates the audible boom. A quiet explosion either has a much too low amplitude, or develops at a much too low brisance (reaction speed, velocity of wavefront). Either way, since the sound of the explosion is identical to the shockwave that does the destructive work, only explosions as awsomely, impressively loud as those heard in all CD videos you can find are capable of cutting structural steel

Of course you know all of this, because we have told you it all over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again.

I call your behaviour pure denial, if not outright dishonesty.
 
Chris are you saying that all you have to do is establish a possiblilty and that is the end of your responsibility in this debate?

C7 is in the same boat that I am in.

He convincingly shows that nanothermite CAN cut structural materials.
I convincingly argue that midgets with saws CAN cut structural materials.

So it follows that WTC7 was demolished with nanothermite, AND WTC was demolished by midgets with saws.


No YOU debunk that! :cool:
 
There's your problem right there. The military does not have unlimited funding. The government does not have unlimited funding. They have resources and they have competing priorities like everyone else. An appeal to military magic is not going to cut it in this thread. Prove the use of such a device using the evidence at hand or accept the fact that there were no hush-a-booms in any of the World Trade Center buildings.
500 billion is effectively unlimited and for the military, blowing things up is priority #1.

Demanding I tell you exactly how it could be done is just a child's game of denial. I have established the possibility that nano-thermite devices could have been used to bring down the three towers and that is enough.

Cheney could hand you a confession and you would call him as liar. You will deny everything, concede nothing and think up reasons not to believe forever because you cannot believe your government could be so evil.

It couldn't happen here. This is America and we are better than everyone else!
 
for the military, blowing things up is priority #1.
LOL

I have established the possibility that nano-thermite devices could have been used to bring down the three towers and that is enough.
LOL

Cheney could hand you a confession and you would call him as liar.
LOL

You will deny everything, concede nothing and think up reasons not to believe forever because you cannot believe your government could be so evil.

It couldn't happen here. This is America and we are better than everyone else!
What a poor pathetic man you are, Christopher.
 
Last edited:
500 billion is effectively unlimited and for the military, blowing things up is priority #1.

Demanding I tell you exactly how it could be done is just a child's game of denial. I have established the possibility that nano-thermite devices could have been used to bring down the three towers and that is enough.

Cheney could hand you a confession and you would call him as liar. You will deny everything, concede nothing and think up reasons not to believe forever because you cannot believe your government could be so evil.

It couldn't happen here. This is America and we are better than everyone else!

No, it is not enough to just establish a possibility. "Just asking questions" is not a debate tactic. You either prove out your theory or you are just trolling.
 
C7 is in the same boat that I am in.

He convincingly shows that nanothermite CAN cut structural materials.
Thank you for that rare moment of honesty.

I convincingly argue that midgets with saws CAN cut structural materials.

So it follows that WTC7 was demolished with nanothermite, AND WTC was demolished by midgets with saws.

No YOU debunk that! :cool:
I'm not buyin' the midgets hypothesis. Teenage mutant ninja, nano-t and bean burrito eating, fire ******* termites is my favorite back-up theory. :D
 
No, it is not enough to just establish a possibility. "Just asking questions" is not a debate tactic. You either prove out your theory or you are just trolling.
Just asking questions is a tactic used by JREFers all the time. Thank you for acknowledging that it is not a valid debate tactic.

Demanding the impossible isn't a valid debate tactic either.
 
Just asking questions is a tactic used by JREFers all the time. Thank you for acknowledging that it is not a valid debate tactic.

Demanding the impossible isn't a valid debate tactic either.

So you admit that your theory is impossible to prove. Ladies and gentlemen, I believe we have arrived.
 
Thank you for that rare moment of honesty.
May it serve as an example and inspiration to you. You need it, C7 :) ETA: Giving you a chance to show some honesty below

I'm not buyin' the midgets hypothesis.
No way!!! I am hurt, HURT, I tell ya! :eek:

Alright, tit for tat: I am not buying your nanothermite hypothesis. For the same reasons.
Oh, which nanothermite hypothesis, anyway? The EXPLOSIVE one that I asked you a few questions about - which you again cleverly ignored?

Teenage mutant ninja, nano-t and bean burrito eating, fire ******* termites is my favorite back-up theory. :D
This isn't much worse than the one you actually promote. ;)




ETA: And now for the questions you so cleverly and dishonestly avoided:

...
"It can't be because there's no boom boom" is a thread bear canard that assumes you know all ther is to know about nano-thermite. You don't.
...

Got a few more questions for you:
  1. Richard Gage claims publicly that WTC7 was brought down by explosive demolition. Is that true or not true (that Gage makes that claim)?
  2. Do you agree with Richard Gage that WTC7 was brought down by explosive demolition?
  3. Do explosions exist that don't go BOOM, yes or no?
  4. What property of explosions is it, by the way, that severs structural steel? The heat, the volume increase, or the shockwave?
  5. Do quiet explosions have the ability to cut or break structural steel? Yes or No?

I know you won't answer these questions. You never do. So let me give the answers for you:
  1. Yes, Richard Gage makes that claim. Most recently about 2 weeks ago at the press conference that kicked of his current tour.
  2. You have no idea what you are supposed to believe
  3. No, such explosions do not exist
  4. It's the shockwave that cuts the steel.
  5. No, quiet explosions can't do that. The shockwave comes from the application of high velocity explosives (much higher than the reaction speed in nano-thermite), and of course it must have a sufficiently high amplitudel The very same shockwave is what creates the audible boom. A quiet explosion either has a much too low amplitude, or develops at a much too low brisance (reaction speed, velocity of wavefront). Either way, since the sound of the explosion is identical to the shockwave that does the destructive work, only explosions as awsomely, impressively loud as those heard in all CD videos you can find are capable of cutting structural steel

Of course you know all of this, because we have told you it all over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again.

I call your behaviour pure denial, if not outright dishonesty.
 
Last edited:
Real suspects of 911
Paul Bremer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xpw7fUj11bA&feature=youtu.be
On Board of directors of Komatsu:
At 1:53 "Komatsu - In July 1996 patented a nano-thermite demolition device"
Patent 5532449 Issued on July 2, 1996

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of the present invention to provide a method and an apparatus which can demolish a concrete structure at a high efficiency while preventing a secondary problem due to noise, flying dust and chips, and the like.
http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/5532449/description.html

It could be engineered to destroy steel framed buildings as well.


How many of these devices were found in the rubble?
 
Real suspects of 911
Paul Bremer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xpw7fUj11bA&feature=youtu.be
On Board of directors of Komatsu:
At 1:53 "Komatsu - In July 1996 patented a nano-thermite demolition device"
Patent 5532449 Issued on July 2, 1996

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of the present invention to provide a method and an apparatus which can demolish a concrete structure at a high efficiency while preventing a secondary problem due to noise, flying dust and chips, and the like.
http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/5532449/description.html

It could be engineered to destroy steel framed buildings as well.

You can't imagine that a stationary discharge device could be developed because your imagination only works in one direction - "It can't be because".

Engineering =/= imagining.


Maybe they ninjaneered it.
 
500 billion is effectively unlimited and for the military, blowing things up is priority #1.

Demanding I tell you exactly how it could be done is just a child's game of denial. I have established the possibility that nano-thermite devices could have been used to bring down the three towers and that is enough.

Cheney could hand you a confession and you would call him as liar. You will deny everything, concede nothing and think up reasons not to believe forever because you cannot believe your government could be so evil.

It couldn't happen here. This is America and we are better than everyone else!

So your motivation is hatred of the government?
 
You do NOT know what nano-thermite can do because that information is classified.


You seem to misunderstand how this works.....

General, basic science (even "new" discoveries) is not generally classified.....this is partially due to the fact of WHO it is that conducts basic science research....

Military research is always goal oriented towards APPLICATION OR POTENTIAL APPLICATION......other research is often oriented towards increasing knowledge for the sake of knowledge.....the military has no such interest.

What is typically classified are the DETAILS of HOW something is being used, not the fundamental capabilities of it. Any capable lab in the world can reproduce nano-thermite and play around with particle sizes and mixtures......but the application of that material is where specialists come in. And THAT is what is classified.

When Sunstealer tell you that nano thermite cant do what you think it can you should listen to him....he is talking about the physics and chemistry of the material....something even the military is bound by.

When you tell him he cant know this because of classifications you are showing your ignorance and lack of knowledge between something that is fundamental science and something which is an application of that science.

The application is still bound by the laws of physics and chemistry....but we do not want the general public (and especially our adversaries) to know what we have up our sleeves. Just like you fail at physics and mathematics....you fail at understanding the military, the intelligence communities, and how and what is typically classified.

Stick to carpentry.....THAT is your area of expertise.....in these other areas you are making yourself look very very stupid. Just stop.
 
500 billion is effectively unlimited and for the military, blowing things up is priority #1.

Do you have any idea which areas of the DOD received the largest amount of funds the last 10 years?

No......you don't.

Do you know which "special" programs received the most funding for the last 5 years?


No......you don't.


"Blowing things up" is not the #1 priority within the military or the DOD....you have absolutely no idea what the hell you are talking about.

Why do you continue talking about **** that you dont know anything about?

Why do you do that?
 
"It can't be There is no proof of explosives because there's no boom boom" is a thread bear canard reality-based fact that assumes you know all ther is to know about what was heard in the available videos nano-thermite. You don't..
I've fixed your misrepresentation of Alienentity's argument for you.

Now you can go on inventing magical hush-a-booms, but that will never go beyond speculation, because it's all you can possibly have. There's no proof of any sophisticated devices anywhere in the whole GZ recovered materials, no detonators, no explosives, no nothing, and there should be heaps according to your speculation.

And that applies to the rest of your arguments since then. Here's what you got wrong:

It is enough to establish the possibility.
Not if the claim is an accusation, or an extraordinary claim that contradicts well-established facts. In that case the whole burden of proof is on you. It's your task to prove that such devices exist and are real, and that they were used, and if it's an accusation, by who. Otherwise you're just speculating.

If you claim that flies eat men, it's not enough to establish the possibility because flies can eat and **** and therefore they can **** as they eat and devour a whole man. It takes more than that to prove that they indeed do eat men. And it takes more than showing a skeleton surrounded by flies.



So it follows that WTC7 was demolished with nanothermite, AND WTC was demolished by midgets with saws.
Hey, yours is more general. It must be more correct.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom