When you went looking did you find the energy to seriously list 20 reasons? If so, please, go ahead.
Dunno. How fat is the kid? That will affect my repair bill, and also how many points I get.
The Schillinger incident is mentioned by IIRC Filip Mueller, Jerzy Tabau, Pery Broad, John Wiernicki, Zalmen Gradowski, Shlomo Dragon, Sara Nomberg-Pryztyk, and Janda Weiss.
Who fictionalized Nakam, for example, or made it up in pathological lies?
Wow, you can use Wikipedia. But that wasn't the point, was it? You in fact "advocated" people who were subject to atrocities seeking murderous revenge, not me. You said the absence of such reactions was proof that the Nazis didn't subject the Jews to the sorts of mistreatment described. So, now, does the presence of such murderous and vengeful reactions thereby prove the mistreatment described? LOL Your arguments are idiotic and all come down to your ignorance, your prejudices, and your lack of life experience.
Perhaps it was a prayer for you to get some sense. I certainly know I've raised my eyes skyward often enough while reading your posts.
You're missing my point; denying the suffering their ancestors went through can easily garner you an beatdown, not just talking about it. Heck, there are plenty of Germans who might stomp your head in. The people in the Holocaust didn't have access to Wikipedia and text messages; they weren't aware of every single atrocity, and much of it wasn't uncovered until the post-war investigations.
Incredulity. If they are too weak, that makes it physically impossible for them to riot. The Jews were systematically oppressed. There are plenty of people, even today, who suffer under similar treatment and don't rebel. For a good potion of the USSR's history, most of the populace could be hauled out and executed or sent to the gulag just on the suspicion of the Party. No trial, no hearing, no appeal.
Sure is, which is why no one is asserting it. Jews rebelled. We've show you.
evidence plz
Yes, if they've been systematically indoctrinated to believe in the Untermenschen concept. Or are you completely unaware with how crowd psychology works? People can get up to absolutely ridiculous and horrible things if there are enough of them that they wouldn't even contemplate on their own.
Yes.
Yes.
No one is asserting such. Were babies thrown into fire pits and gas chambers? Yes. Did this happen with every single baby? No. Was it happening all the time? No.
We've been backing up our arguments with facts for dozens of pages now, and Clay just keeps on being ignorant. I see no reason his invincible ignorance would be swayed by talking to actual Jewish people. I honestly don't know how many would try to beat him up, but I do know his claims would likely anger them.
And where were the soldiers? Does the article say they kids were ever playing while the chambers were active?
Yes, because parents never bring their kids in for safety reasons.
So you agree that the children wouldn't be in danger from ash. I don't understand why you bought it up, then.
Which is why Clay's assertion was manifestly false.
Who is making that assertion?
Let's review. Revolters: All jews -> Some Jews -> All Jews -> No Jews ever.
1. No backing.
Yes, people tend to get emotional when you discuss the systemic genocide of millions of their ancestors, as revealed by decades of historical study which people during the war did not have the benefit of.
I never said that, nor did anyone else. Straw man. Jewish people did revolt, as you have studiously ignored.
Who said this?
Not all of them, no.
If I saw someone doing that today, I'd call the police. Were the Jews going to whip out their cell phones and call 911? The standard reaction to witnessing horrible things is not "murderous rage" but "shock".
Not an answer.
Some cars have so little substance that they can safely be ignored, in the context of this thread. Why did you pick that model?
