Merged 9/11 No Plane/Energy Weapon discussion thread

[WTC Dust]

Why do you always confuse "smoke" and "fumes?"

When was this taken?

It's not confusion. Smoke, as it is commonly understood, results from combustion. I specifically use fumes because combustion wasn't going on. To call it smoke would be to imply combustion, and I'm doing the exact opposite. I am refuting combustion as the source of the fumes.

Remember, after 100 days of smelling it, I swore that nobody would ever convince me that it was an ordinary fire.

 

[beachnut]

What do you consider bogus about it?

It is a fantasy to think the WTC was destroyed by your Energy Weapon which you can't define, put numbers to, or supply the science to turn steel to dust or foam. Big failure.

 

[Resume]

Recently I saw a piece of art that was pretty much a bunch of twisted, bent metal. Did a DEW do this?

That means Chicago's Picasso sculpture is a giant Afghan hound that was defurrified by a sooper-seekrit de . . . furrifier!

 

[WTC Dust]

When was this picture taken?
What was the content of that dump truck?
What were the wind conditions on that day?

Wow. Lots of questions. Before I answer them, what are your initial impressions of the dump truck image?

 

[beachnut]

Check out this picture of a dump truck. I don't see anyone actively adding things to the dump truck. It looks like they put the stuff in there and left. Then the stuff is fuming. You can see the fumes. There isn't anyone adding things to the dump truck when the picture was taken, so I don't think it was being stirred up. I think the fumes are rising from the material placed in the dump truck.

dust

Wow, that is hard

 

[Dash80]

It's not confusion. Smoke, as it is commonly understood, results from combustion. I specifically use fumes because combustion wasn't going on. To call it smoke would be to imply combustion, and I'm doing the exact opposite. I am refuting combustion as the source of the fumes.

Remember, after 100 days of smelling it, I swore that nobody would ever convince me that it was an ordinary fire.

Was that photo taken 100 days later? How can you be sure it's not smoke?

 

[Bell]

Wow. Lots of questions. Before I answer them, what are your initial impressions of the dump truck image?

My impressions do not matter if we want to find out what happened on that picture.

 

[WTC Dust]

Jesus Christ in a canoe! What the hell could anyone possibly discern from that stupid photo? It looks like a dumpster someone just threw some drywall into; you can't show its provenance so what's the point?

Drywall doesn't do quite that. Fumes rising when nobody appears to be disturbing the contents of the dump truck. Very strange. Similar to these pictures and news story.

 

[beachnut]

Drywall doesn't do quite that. Fumes rising when nobody appears to be disturbing the contents of the dump truck. Very strange. Similar to these pictures and news story.

More dust.

 

[WTC Dust]

My impressions do not matter if we want to find out what happened on that picture.

So you yourself have nothing to say about the dump truck fumes? OK.

 

[Spindrift]

Drywall doesn't do quite that. Fumes rising when nobody appears to be disturbing the contents of the dump truck. Very strange. Similar to these pictures and news story.

You've never heard of wind?

 

[timhau]

Wrong!!

The upper left is Thor, the upper right is Laser Weapons System (LaWS), lower left is Active Denial System (ADS), lower right is World Trade Center (WTC).

Thor is not an acronym so obviously it does not belong. How did you miss that?

Wrong! THOR is, in fact, short for The HOuse-dustifier Ray.

 

[WTC Dust]

There's your problem.

I'm pretty sure no one has denied the existence of energy weapons. What is being denied is that there was any energy weapon in existence in 2001 capable of destroying the towers.

As long as today, in 2012, there is no one on JREF who denies the existence of energy weapons, I'm good.

 

[Resume]

So you yourself have nothing to say about the dump truck fumes? OK.

Since they are not fumes, I guess not.

 

[Dash80]

Tracy is forever claiming something is "fumes"

The smoke pouring from WTC7? FUMES

The smoke, dust and debris following the plane impacts? Yup, FUMES.

 

[Bell]

So you yourself have nothing to say about the dump truck fumes? OK.

In other words, you have no answers to my questions and therefor are unable to tell what is going on in that picture.

 

[Bell]

As long as today, in 2012, there is no one on JREF who denies the existence of energy weapons, I'm good.

We also don't deny the existence of holograms or foam. Think about it!

 

[Resume]

Drywall doesn't do quite that.

Yes it does, under the correct circumstances. Your PhD isn't helping much here, nor it seems does your life experiences. I can think of a number of things happening in that photo that have nothing to do with "fumes."

Destroying fluorescent lighting as just one example.

Once upon a time I was a supervisor for one of the largest building/construction maintenance firms in Chicago, and I threw lots of stuff into dumpsters.

 

[Spindrift]

As long as today, in 2012, there is no one on JREF who denies the existence of energy weapons, I'm good.

As long as you agree there wasn't an energy weapon in existence in 2001 that could have destroyed the towers, we're good too.

 

[dafydd]

That's actually a good point, Joe. I reiterate that I wouldn't have posted this thread except several JREFers denied the existence of energy weapons.

No, just you and Jude The Mental's huge, imaginary weapon. Anyway, none of the weapons you showed could ''dustify'' or''foamify'' (you never seem to be able to make your mind up on that one) steel. You and Judy Wood make a great double act.