Merged 9/11 No Plane/Energy Weapon discussion thread

[WTC Dust]

But completely imaginary technology does.

No planes isn't my theory. I am repeatedly asked to account for video images of an airplane by the barrage of questioners. Don't be confused, though.

My theory isn't about airplanes, it's about metallic foam and how this foam came into existence.

 

[notheist]

I've got a lot to say about 9/11 that you won't hear from anyone else. You want to silence me?

Children also have lots to say about 9/11 and like you completely useless. But children have an excuse for not knowing things normal educated people should know, what is your excuse? Drugs?, mental retardation?,

 

[Bell]

No planes isn't my theory. I am repeatedly asked to account for video images of an airplane by the barrage of questioners. Don't be confused, though.

My theory isn't about airplanes, it's about metallic foam and how this foam came into existence.

And I still haven't seen your answer as to how you determined what part of the buildings your foam originated.

 

[WTC Dust]

Do you mean you can't verify that the commission said it was terrorists or that NTSB released radar data? You certainly can verify that they said so. That's at least two more organisms into the "small" conspiracy. And it's only the tip of the iceberg, just a tiny example.

Still, you haven't answered to how did you expect the impact to look like and why they couldn't project the impact if they could project the plane.

Here's my standard: If I can't verify something myself, outside of any reports, then it doesn't fit into my theory. Reports are words, and people get words wrong all the time. Photographs and other forensic evidence provide evidence without the confusing words that someone might have attached to it.

Radar points on a chart? Lists of passengers? Reports of phone calls home made on flights? This stuff is weak evidence compared to WTC remains that I can hold in my hands and the video and still images of the aftermath.

 

[Craig4]

No planes isn't my theory. I am repeatedly asked to account for video images of an airplane by the barrage of questioners. Don't be confused, though.

My theory isn't about airplanes, it's about metallic foam and how this foam came into existence.

You clearly have an integrity deficit. Read your own comments in that silly little "find a wake" nonsense of a thread you had the ill judgement to start. Reading the first page gives the lie to the above statement.

 

[WTC Dust]

And I still haven't seen your answer as to how you determined what part of the buildings your foam originated.

OK. First, compare these two images and tell me what you see.

 

[Wolrab]

I certainly don't want iron and oxygen in my body. What if it got into your blood? The horror.

 

[DGM]

Dr Tracy:

Have you considered the possibility of the sphere actually being the weapon? Maybe you should go crawl around on it and check it out.

 

[WTC Dust]

How this for a couple of images to compare?

 

[WTC Dust]

You clearly have an integrity deficit. Read your own comments in that silly little "find a wake" nonsense of a thread you had the ill judgement to start. Reading the first page gives the lie to the above statement.

That thread only exists because when people find out I study the destruction of the WTC, they automatically barge in and start talking about airplanes. Like, SHUT UP, people! I'm studying what destroyed the WTC. I don't want to talk about planes. But they keep going and going, resulting in me producing a model of what might have happened.

 

[Craig4]

That thread only exists because when people find out I study the destruction of the WTC, they automatically barge in and start talking about airplanes. Like, SHUT UP, people! I'm studying what destroyed the WTC. I don't want to talk about planes. But they keep going and going, resulting in me producing a model of what might have happened.

...that fails to account for airplanes crashing into the buildings. This young padawan is why you fail.

 

[Resume]

I don't want to talk about planes.

Well, you have to talk about planes since that's what flew into the buildings.

 

[JohnG]

In her defense, she's made it known several times (before I put her on ignore, that is) that she, like Judy Wood, believes that it is fully possible for the DEW to fire through the earth to dustify/foamify the WTC. Not that that makes her argument any more coherent; in fact, it just makes things worse.

Wouldn't it have been simpler to crash planes into the buildings?

 

[WTC Dust]

I certainly don't want iron and oxygen in my body. What if it got into your blood? The horror.

Iron oxide in the lungs is bad. It produces siderosis, which has symptoms similar to asbestosis.

 

[Resume]

I've got a lot to say about 9/11 that you won't hear from anyone else. You want to silence me?

No one wants to silence you. Most people have never heard of you. Your "ideas" about 9/11 are irrelevant.

 

[WTC Dust]

Wouldn't it have been simpler to crash planes into the buildings?

Yes.

 

[MarkCorrigan]

Yes.

So...why didn't they just do that?

 

[Resume]

Yes.

Which is what happened.

 

[The Big Dog]

If you go to Battery Park on any day and examine The Sphere, you'll notice strange damage to it that is not expected from objects falling onto it.

You'll notice that many of the pieces of the bronze statue have curled up. Falling items can never cause bronze to curl up >360 degrees, as one of the post-damage images shows. Look at the base of the statue in the last pic. Nothing falling could have caused the base to curl up like it did. Energy weapons!

Jesus Christ.

The Base was curled. "Energy weapons!" didn't do it, the artist did.

You've set a low bar even lower, I'd ask at long last whether you have any dignity left?

 

[Bell]

OK. First, compare these two images and tell me what you see.

OK. First picture. The World Trade Center complex just after the South Tower collapsed, due to UA175 and it's crew and passengers crashing into it, resulting in huge fires that were unfought, weakening the steel columns and sagging the trust floors, pulling the weakened steel columns inwards.

The North Tower is still on fire due to AA11 and it's crew and passengers crashing into it and people are still dying in there. It would collapse half an hour later.

Second picture. Hard to tell by just the picture alone. Looks like a rock or stone or a piece of broken concrete. I have no idea where this is from.