You appear to acknowledge that the commonstoryline is false here Alien because the commonstoryline mandates that gravity and kerosene annihilated the Twin Towers, each in about 10 seconds.
Incorrect. She has completely failed to explain how these effects could in fact be caused by exotic weaponry. She in fact refuses to do so. Her claims are empty, null and void.
There exists a 500 page book that proves your statement is wrong, utterly.
They explained precisely what was relevant to the collapse of the buildings, with ample empirical evidence (something almost completely absent from Judy Wood's work), and also explained in great detail the exact nature of the conspiracy to hijack the planes and crash them.
You are too clever by a half. Assuming, arguendo, your statement that
"[t]hey explained precisely what was relevant to the collapse of the buildings" has some merit, it is really quite weak.
It's like the old tuna fish commercial where Charlie tuna claims he has "taste" because of his high degree of culture; when the issue is whether the particular brand of tuna tastes good to eat.
So it is with your quoted ditty. Explaining precisely what was relevant to the "collapse" of the buildings does not determine, let alone explain what destroyed them. And, as I have earlier noted, NIST openly, albeit obliquely, in a footnote, admitted as much.
See:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8242229&postcount=195
In my opinion, you do the thread a disservice by refusing to acknowledge the complete uselessness of the NIST report. Perhaps you WANT to be able to rely on a governmentally funded, congressionally mandated research project. Goodness knows we SHOULD be able to trust and rely on such undertakings. But, in the event, NIST failed to adhere to their mandate, and were led by SAIC, ARA and others to commit fraud, instead.
Once again:
"The focus of the Investigation was on the sequence of events from the instant of aircraft impact to the initiation of collapse for each tower. For brevity in this report, this sequence is referred to as the “probable collapse sequence,” although it includes little analysis of the structural behavior of the tower after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached and collapse became inevitable." NCSTAR1 pg xxxvii (39 of 298).
And, removing all doubt that "little analysis" actually meant none whatsoever:
"As stated in NCSTAR 1, NIST only investigated the factors leading to the initiation of the collapses of the WTC towers, not the collapses themselves."
That was just nonsense, pure and simple. Hogwash.
Your wish is not our command. On the other hand, you are free to believe whatever you like to believe for howsoever long you choose to hold onto your belief.
Meanwhile, Dr. Judy Wood has determined and proven what destroyed the WTC complex on 9/11.
