Merged 9/11 No Plane/Energy Weapon discussion thread

[twinstead]

So jammonius do YOU believe that a spacecraft 'dustified' the towers?

 

[minnemouse]

Don't blame the herb, there are plenty of successful, intelligent people that partake. Just saying...

I do agree though, Ms. Blevins is a grape short of a fruit salad. Ms. Woods, however, is off the deep end. What kind of individual would find something odd about rust spots on the underside of motor vehicles. Especially considering the truck that was flipped over, judging by the underbody, was a mid-70's truck. Find me a non-restored 70's vehicle without rust and I'll buy you a cookie.

I am sure there are herbs that are really good; I am just saying that certain herbs are not good for SOME folks

As for rust.....jeeeze - we`ve imported a few veteran cars from GB - and lo and behold - they have RUST!!!! Hehehehehe... After a several years unattended, especially near the ocean, all cars gets rusty! Its not a mystery; its just blood annoying if one wants to restore the car into mint condition, and one is not THAT handy in the welding department To me the only mystery is; how can people let these fantastic cars just sit there eroding for years and years?

 

[Macgyver1968]

The simple fact is Dr. Judy posts random images that only have significance to her..No one else knows what the **** she is talking about. Somehow her followers see relevance to these and assign great meaning to these findings.

It amazes me how devoted her follower are. Take amandareckonwith on DIF...he acts like he get commission from Dr. Judy's book.

 

[alienentity]

Cranks and diehard contrarians.

Not too pick but the word is spelled 'idol', not idle. Probly jsut a tiepo.

 

[CompusMentus]

Cranks and diehard contrarians.

Not too pick but the word is spelled 'idol', not idle. Probly jsut a tiepo.

"Idle" works well for me :=]



Compus

 

[Macgyver1968]

Cranks and diehard contrarians.

Not too pick but the word is spelled 'idol', not idle. Probly jsut a tiepo.

corrected...thanks AE

 

[twinstead]

Cranks and diehard contrarians.

indeed

 

[jammonius]

So Jammy...answer me the question...what does rusted undercarriage parts of tornado victims truck have to do with the destruction of the 9/11 towers?

The answer is found in "Where Did the Towers Go?" in various sections. See, e.g., "Rustification" pg. 251 et seq. As you know, I will not do your homework for you, let alone play "20 Questions". As you know very well, I do not play such games where posters get to make inquiries that they then judge the answers, usually by requiring more proof. That process is a game.

Is there a claim you'd like to make? If so, make it.

 

[jammonius]

How does this evidence relate to Judy Wood's 'theories' on the destruction of the WTC?


How does this evidence relate to Judy Wood's 'theories' on the destruction of the WTC?

Your question presumes something about Dr. Wood that you have not shown to be a valid premise. Dr. Wood does not put her information forward as a "theory." Rather, she puts her information forward as forensic proof of what did and of what did not happen to the WTC complex on 9/11.

There exists information tending to establish there are DEW in or on space platforms. That information is cloaked in secrecy and in obfuscation. On its face, the placement of weapons in space is illegal under the terms of the Outer Space Treaty, (OST) to which the USA is a party. However, there are published indications to the effect that the USA disputes the meaning of the OST with respect to space weapons.

Have you examined the evidence of DEW and the sources of information concerning DEW that I have elsewhere posted; or, better still, on your own?

I hope you have done so or will do so if you are interested in the subject of DEW.

So she has no theory then. Fine. Maybe she should stop beating around the bush and state 'I have no *********** clue what I'm talking about. Buy my book'
There are lots of twits publishing books, she's just another one of them. She hasn't discovered anything profound about the collapses, she's just profoundly wrong.

Your post as quoted above makes no sense at all, other than as a statement that you do not wish to look closely at what Dr. Wood has shown. That is your choice.

Well you just got pwned on that one, didn't you? Your credibility just went negative - it's below zero. The only reason to engage you at all is for amusement, because you're not intellectually honest. No, you're not.

That is false. The radio interview, if that is what you're referring to, was quoted out of context and on the basis of the word "yes" while more than one person was also speaking at the same time. If that is how proof is constructed by debunkers, then it merely confirms a degree of desparation and of grasping at straws.

Your empty claim is hereby tossed into the dustbin, along with those of the Dust Gang.

Cute, too cute by a half. But, hey, it's only a message board, you can post what you like. But, on the other hand "Where Did the Towers Go?" is a book.

 

[Macgyver1968]

Well..jammy...I don't have a copy of Judy's book...so why don't you let us know what the "rustification" of the undercarriage of a truck in a tornado means. and how it relates to the destruction of the twin towers.

 

[Macgyver1968]

Oh...I know you won't answer, because your demi-god Dr. Judy doesn't answer...You don't know what to say.

 

[Macgyver1968]

You're still online...why don't you answer?

 

[jammonius]

Having acknowledged you don't have the book is a rather crucial acknowledgment, Macgyver.

You obviously don't know what you're talking about. I have already cited the place in the book where your answers are to be found and do not think it necessary to repeat that here.

I am willing to discuss the book with people who have read it or are interested in reading it, as exemplified, say, by being on the waiting list at the library to get it; or, by indicating they will get it just as soon as their next UE check comes in, or right after they catch up on child support payments, or some other legitimate excuse for not having read the book as yet.

I will not read it for you, however. If you don't have the book, just go to drjudywood.com and find relevant topics there as a substitute.

There, I've given you a way forward.

 

[BravesFan]

Similarly, posters who engage in context-ripping of radio interviews do not merit replies.

In general, however, and in order to overcome disinformation, it should be noted Dr. Wood does not make a claim concerning location of weaponry that destroyed the WTC complex. The reason is that any such claim would be speculative.

There is evidence that laser and other DEW have been placed in space, and the evidence to that effect predates 9/11. Posters interested can take a look either at the court papers filed by Dr. Wood or at the website of the Directed Energy Professional Society.

There is also evidence that high flying stealth aircraft were flying above NYC on 9/11. This evidence can also be found at Dr. Wood's website, in the form of authenticated eye witness testimony from EMT Patricia Ondrovic.

Despite the existence of evidence, Dr. Wood does not make a claim as to location of the weaponry that destroyed the WTC complex.

Those who have a vested interest in proving she said the weapons were space-based are engaging in disinformation, manipulation and misrepresentation.

]]nothing you say merits a reply because it's incoherent ludicrous jibberish . There are monkey's in Borneo laughing at this thread.

 

[jammonius]

You're still online...why don't you answer?

You're a bit impatient, aren't you Macgyver...

 

[jammonius]

]]nothing you say merits a reply because it's incoherent ludicrous jibberish . There are monkey's in Borneo laughing at this thread.

I have already lamented the poor quality of debunking seen to be taking place here.

Are there any lurkers out there who can do better? Your help is desparately needed.

Come on,

DO BETTER

 

[Macgyver1968]

Of course I don't have the book...why in god's name would I pay $50 for a piece of crap like that...when I already know the content of her website?

I asked you to present evidence from her book that clarifies the meaning of her "rustification" of trucks in a tornado.

Obiviously, you couldn't do that, because there is no meaning to her random images. It's all some crazy theory in her head that only she understands.

 

[jammonius]

Of course I don't have the book...why in god's name would I pay $50 for a piece of crap like that...when I already know the content of her website?

I asked you to present evidence from her book that clarifies the meaning of her "rustification" of trucks in a tornado.

Obiviously, you couldn't do that, because there is no meaning to her random images. It's all some crazy theory in her head that only she understands.

You just keep on digging, don't you Macgyver. You want me to do homework on a book you haven't read and are bad mouthing, nonetheless. You are not being reasonable here. On occassion you are reasonable. When you are, I tend to value dialogue with you.

Is this clear?

Meanwhile, take care.

Once again, are there any LURKERS who feel capable of rational, substantiated debunking? If so, jump in. I'm here waiting.

 

[CompusMentus]

JREF isn't the only place, by far, that you'll find disrespect for Judy Wood. For instance read the bulk of the comments left by her students when they rated her as a Professor (From HERE)

oh wow...she is a terrible teacher. she writes SO small on the board and talks straight into so the class has no idea what is going on. Don't dare ask a question in class because she will laugh in your face. The only way i passed her class was for my SI leader. I do not recommend her at all.

She is unwilling to help you understand the material in class. She is not an effective teacher. I depended on my book to pass the class. I do not suggest her for anyone! She ridicules students in class when they ask questions.

what they said... dont take her and if you must, go to SI

Very bad teacher, never organized, can't understand a question and if she can, refuses to answer it. Need a microscope to read the board. Looks to take off points rather than to give you points. Refuses to answer her door when you knock on it. I want my money back for the lack of teaching.

VERY VERY VERY unorganized and unprofessional. Avoid her at all cost. I did not belive a professor could be this bad until I had her. She gave my first exam back three and a half weeks afte I took it. She expected homework to be turned in at the beginning of class yet she was always late. Always!!

ok um... what's a good word that will describe her... She um.... SUCKS!!!! SHE IS SO HORRIBLE! WOW! I MEAN I WAS LIKE WOW, WHY ARE YOU STILL TEACHING?

Dr. Wood has good intentions, but she is not wound too tight. Not a good teacher if you are looking for orgainization and structure. She gives lots of real world examples and tries to illustrate topics more than most teachers. However, this will not help you are her tests. They are difficult.

She woke up from a coma and decided her calling was to become a professor. She did not really seem to know the material, and she was hopeless at trying to convey it to the student. She fails to be able to complete a thought if not a sentance. If it is possible at all, aviod her.

Like others said, she had good intentions and when she wasn't trying to convince us Bush blew up the WTC she was actually nice, but she wasn't a great teacher. Too many times she starts examples and doesn't finish them. And yes, she was in a coma for 6 years. How crazy is that.

She is an odd lady, to say the least. She is very good at what she does, but she can't always explain it well enough for students to understand. SHE TAKES FOR EVER TO GIVE EXAMS BACK!!!!! It took here 3 weeks to give an exam back once.

Some observations of Judy Wood expressed above are interesting:-

"Don't dare ask a question in class because she will laugh in your face"

"She ridicules students in class when they ask questions"

"can't understand a question and if she can, refuses to answer it"

Sound familiar?

Leopards and spots.

Compus







Compus

 

[Macgyver1968]

No Jammy...there are no lurkers here that agree with you...it's all in your head. You can't answer my question because Dr. Judy doesn't answer it. You are dependent on her for your answers.

What's it like to depend on others for you answers?