• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged 9/11 No Plane/Energy Weapon discussion thread

MRC_Hans said:
No, that does not follow. The autheticity of victims does in no way hinge on a random internet poster's listing of their orbituaries.

Hans
Click to expand...

My dear fellow,

BINGO!! The above is the point that stands out over and above all else. That is why I referred to Compus' activity in serially posting up obituaries as a "propaganda project" with respect to a thread that challenged the evidence concerning whether any jetliner at all had hit WTC2.

It is worth repeating:

"The authenticity [sic] of victims does in no way hinge on a random internet poster's listing of their obituaries[sic]."

Well said.

Compus, take note, please.
 
jammonius said:
My dear fellow,

BINGO!! The above is the point that stands out over and above all else. That is why I referred to Compus' activity in serially posting up obituaries as a "propaganda project" with respect to a thread that challenged the evidence concerning whether any jetliner at all had hit WTC2.

It is worth repeating:

"The authenticity [sic] of victims does in no way hinge on a random internet poster's listing of their obituaries[sic]."

Well said.

Compus, take note, please.
Click to expand...

The existence of such orbituaries OTOH. .... However, I acknowledge that the pure desperation of your unsustainable claims will drive you to lengths like this, so no offense taken.

Hans
 
MRC_Hans said:
No, that does not follow. The autheticity of victims does in no way hinge on a random internet poster's listing of their orbituaries.

Hans
Click to expand...

How true.

I can add further it was never my intention to use those postings as proof of "the authenticity of the victims". I only presented them as a counter for jammonius' insane claims. The challenge was for him to successfully contest any of the hundreds of facts found in those postings. He could not, cannot, will not ever be able to do so.

Compus
 
CompusMentus said:
Firstly, I have to wonder what part of "I do not want to revisit that thread" (as I wrote above) does jammonius not understand? Secondly, the thread in question was closed by the mods here making it a little difficult for me to follow his ill-informed advice.

Once again we have a demonstration of the double-standards, the blatant hypocricy shown many times in this forum. Whilst calling out for respect for certain discredited individuals we see side-by-side the denegration and wholesale defamation of a mass of victims of 9/11. Jammonius, by his words above, implies that Lee Hanson perjured himself in front of a US Court of Justice. He offers no proof that this could be true. Only hollow disgusting insinuations that that man is a liar and imposter and not a witness to and victim of what happened on that day.

As for the unposted facts about the remaining passengers. I would never, until my dying day, post them on demand for jammonius. I wouldn't give him the satisfaction of me doing so. I do have them stored and I can safely say they are available if I ever needed them. They are also available to anyone with a wont to find. Easily. Google is your freind.


Compus
Click to expand...

If you do not want to revisit that thread, why do you keep posting about it?

As to Lee Hanson, as I recall, I did not accuse him of perjury. I said he based his statement not on what he saw; but rather, upon what he saw on teevee. Really, Compus, after a thread of, what, 3000 posts +/-, didn't you grasp that the whole point was that what was seen on teevee was an illusion, a part of a psyop and, not coincidentally, part of a military exercise based on simulating hijacking of an aircraft and crashing them into building. A simulated exercise that relied on compartmentalized, secret information.

You are right, however, the thread was closed. So, as an alternative, start a new one. This is my last reply on the matter.
 
jammonius said:
MRC_Hans said:
No, that does not follow. The autheticity of victims does in no way hinge on a random internet poster's listing of their orbituaries.

Hans
Click to expand...
"The authenticity [sic] of victims does in no way hinge on a random internet poster's listing of their obituaries[sic]."
Click to expand...

Allow me throw in a piece of personal advice:

Jammonius, do yourself a favor and learn what "sic" means and how it is properly used before you use it again.
Your usage is the exact opposite of how it is meant to be used.



(Perhaps this is a clue to understanding jammonius' entire oeuvre? Perhaps he does this more often - using words opposite to their correct usage?)
 
jammonius said:
If you do not want to revisit that thread, why do you keep posting about it?

As to Lee Hanson, as I recall, I did not accuse him of perjury. I said he based his statement not on what he saw; but rather, upon what he saw on teevee. Really, Compus, after a thread of, what, 3000 posts +/-, didn't you grasp that the whole point was that what was seen on teevee was an illusion, a part of a psyop and, not coincidentally, part of a military exercise based on simulating hijacking of an aircraft and crashing them into building. A simulated exercise that relied on compartmentalized, secret information.

You are right, however, the thread was closed. So, as an alternative, start a new one. This is my last reply on the matter.
Click to expand...
And your evidence for this elaborate psyop hijacking of the media is, what, exactly?
 
jammonius said:
As to Lee Hanson, as I recall, I did not accuse him of perjury.
Click to expand...


Jammonius seems to have difficulty comprehending plain English. NB my bold.....


CompusMentus said:
Jammonius, by his words above, implies that Lee Hanson perjured himself in front of a US Court of Justice.
Click to expand...


As below.....


jammonius said:
...it has been disclosed that military PSYOPS specifically include the making up of fake people, based on fake identities that are all documentable via web searches, including photos.
Click to expand...


As for Lee Hanson basing his testimony on "what he saw on teevee", see below what I originally wrote. NB my bold once more.....

CompusMentus said:
Peters father recounted the ordeal for the federal jury at the trial of confessed al-Qaeda conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui.

Whilst testifying there, he said that after hearing his son's final words — "Oh, my God! Oh, my God! Oh, my God!" — Lee Hanson then said he turned to the television and saw the jet carrying his son, daughter-in-law and 2½-year-old granddaughter slam into the World Trade Center's south tower.
Click to expand...



Disrespect? Lurkers and posters, you decide (jammoniustm).

Compus
 
LSSBB said:
And your evidence for this elaborate psyop hijacking of the media is, what, exactly?
Click to expand...

I take it you haven't much experience with our friend jammy, have you? In short, the question you ask is likely to produce a ten paragraph screed, basically saying that he won't answer. Jammy don't play that.
 
I have nothing to add (what is there to add?) other than my personal observation that in the highly unlikely event that I'd choose to defend a prominent figure in the 9/11 Truther community, Dr. Woods is just about the last person I'd pick. Her ideas can be easily blasted away with trivial effort by anyone with so much as a 6th grade acquaintance with physics -- or reality for that matter.

I mean, really -- Judy Woods??
 
The energy weapon was the energetic disassembly of two passenger planes transfering the energy from the impact of the crash of both of them into the buildings and from the resulting explosions
 
jammonius said:
This is only an indirect reply to the above as I do not seek to prove anything to you. You are the master of your own belief formation process, your own mechanism of determining when something has been proven to your satisfaction. I do not wish to enter into that process with you as it gives you too much power to be arbitrary. In the game you are proposing, you get to say when your have been satisfied that something is proven to you.

As for me engaging in that process: No thank you.

What I would like to offer, though, is the observation that those who have claimed Where Did the Towers Go? is unavailable in li·brar·ies. noun, plural appear to have used an unreliable search engine:

[qimg]http://i1008.photobucket.com/albums/af205/jfibonacci/libraries.jpg[/qimg]

My own survey of the list of 35 li·brar·ies. noun, plural resulting from the above search show activity in the li·brar·ies. noun, plural whereby copies of WDTTG? are checked out AND/OR on hold.

You could order pizza for you and yours, and act as if it is on me :D
Click to expand...

Well that is depressing. What a spectacular waste of state and local funds. I'm in Boston, where I just flew into Logan, where real hijackers took off in a real plane with real crew and real passengers 10 years ago. I'll try to have pizza from one of the good Portuguese places in their memory.
 
Bell said:
We should bring Judy Woods and clunkety clunk lady together. Maybe the universe will asplode.
Click to expand...


On America's Got Talent! The DEW CREW! Here's a litlle ditty they could jam together on...

Clappedy-clap, clunkiddy-clunk, all this DEW's got me in a funk
Clunkiddy-clunk, clappidy-clap, all this DEW makes me wanna rap
HEY!
Lasers, masers, plasmoids, DEW, these are things that are gonna get YEW!
Dustify, Dustify, pulverise, POOF! No plane theory hit tha roof!
Hurricane Erin, Hutchison effect, laser beams will intersect
Brought down the towers, cooked up a storm
Never seen before, not the norm
Tell your Mamma tell your dad
That's all sheeples,
YOU'VE BEEN HAD.

No disrespect intended


Compus
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom