• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged 9/11 No Plane/Energy Weapon discussion thread

Is GREG JENKINS a one-hit wonder?

Whenever a thread concerning Judy Wood appears, it is almost certain that a reference will be made to "The Greg Jenkins Video." The reference is sometimes made with hallowed-like phrasing, as if the next question should be: "In what year did "The Greg Jenkins Video" win the Oscar for best original documentary, best soundtrack, best this, that and the other?"

However, other than that video, little else is ever said about Greg Jenkins. Who knows, maybe he's busy writing a book rebutting Where Did the Towers Go? Goodness knows, posters around here seem desparate to find ways to do that; thus far with no success at all. The first reference in this thread was a claim the book wasn't selling. That claim was found wanting. The most recent claim was that the book could not be found in any library. That one also had to be abandoned.

In each instance, by the way--on sales and on libraries--the posters who made the negative claims were each graceful in their acknowledgment of having been incorrect. Their candor in that regard is appreciated. It adds to the quality of the exchange of information. We all make mistakes. It's not a big deal and nothing more need be said about it.

Back to Mr. Jenkins.

Here's what a casual, non-exhaustive google image search reveals at the top level:

jenkins.jpg


The above image was cropped and edited, but the point is, OUR Greg Jenkins is the one in the dark-blue blazer, blue shirt, top button unbuttoned. Two different photos are seen of him in that garb. Both are from "The Greg Jenkins Video." All the other Greg Jenkinses of the world are different from OUR Greg Jenkins. The only photos of him that immediately pop up are from "the video."

It would appear that nothing else that Greg Jenkins has done, either before or since "the video" has garnered much attention.

One Hit Wonder
 
Whenever a thread concerning Judy Wood appears, it is almost certain that a reference will be made to "The Greg Jenkins Video." The reference is sometimes made with hallowed-like phrasing, as if the next question should be: "In what year did "The Greg Jenkins Video" win the Oscar for best original documentary, best soundtrack, best this, that and the other?"

However, other than that video, little else is ever said about Greg Jenkins. Who knows, maybe he's busy writing a book rebutting Where Did the Towers Go? Goodness knows, posters around here seem desparate to find ways to do that; thus far with no success at all. The first reference in this thread was a claim the book wasn't selling. That claim was found wanting. The most recent claim was that the book could not be found in any library. That one also had to be abandoned.

In each instance, by the way--on sales and on libraries--the posters who made the negative claims were each graceful in their acknowledgment of having been incorrect. Their candor in that regard is appreciated. It adds to the quality of the exchange of information. We all make mistakes. It's not a big deal and nothing more need be said about it.

Back to Mr. Jenkins.

Here's what a casual, non-exhaustive google image search reveals at the top level:

[qimg]http://i1008.photobucket.com/albums/af205/jfibonacci/jenkins.jpg[/qimg]

The above image was cropped and edited, but the point is, OUR Greg Jenkins is the one in the dark-blue blazer, blue shirt, top button unbuttoned. Two different photos are seen of him in that garb. Both are from "The Greg Jenkins Video." All the other Greg Jenkinses of the world are different from OUR Greg Jenkins. The only photos of him that immediately pop up are from "the video."

It would appear that nothing else that Greg Jenkins has done, either before or since "the video" has garnered much attention.

One Hit Wonder

Is there a significant point to be made here?
 
Is there a significant point to be made here?


Yes. Why isn't Greg Jenkins mentioned in the tabloids for, say, divorcing one of the Kardashians, or for cheating on Jennifer Aniston?

He is famous, isn't he? :D
 
If you do not want to revisit that thread, why do you keep posting about it?

As to Lee Hanson, as I recall, I did not accuse him of perjury. I said he based his statement not on what he saw; but rather, upon what he saw on teevee. Really, Compus, after a thread of, what, 3000 posts +/-, didn't you grasp that the whole point was that what was seen on teevee was an illusion, a part of a psyop and, not coincidentally, part of a military exercise based on simulating hijacking of an aircraft and crashing them into building. A simulated exercise that relied on compartmentalized, secret information.

You are right, however, the thread was closed. So, as an alternative, start a new one. This is my last reply on the matter.
Do you have a source for the exercise, details, time table, etc? What are you talking about? Judy has insane claims about 911, and they are all nonsense. You go off tangentially on exercises, which if they were being done on 911 would increase the military readiness; but fail to realize the sky over the US is not military airspace; when our military responds we do it and shoot down everything that is not our military - hard to do in airspace filled with 4,000 civilian planes. 911 did change things, but the only thing we needed was secure cockpits, and the what is standard now, you hijack a plane you are beat up and taken down! -
Old hijack procedures for passengers, do nothing, be quiet, do not attract attention..
New hijack procedures passengers, get up and beat the hijacker up and down~!

Judy could be insane, or she is happy to sell books to idiots who can't think for themselves. Which is she? Insane or a fraud? She is the more overtly nutty version of Gage.
 
Last edited:
Who is Judy Wood?

A crazy disgraced former engineering professor, who claims - in direct conflict with reality - that most of WTC 1 and 2 were turned to "dust". This silly lie is echoed by her small coterie of equally whacked-out, mendacious, and incompetent fan-boys and -girls.

Wood claims that a "directed-energy weapon" (DEW) "dustified" the buildings. The hilarious thing is that she can't even define her claim, though. All these years and she has skittered around the fundamental question, of what kind of DEW was supposed to have been used, like a bug on a griddle. Because she is incapable of defining her claim, so are her equally addled groupies.

It's a pathetic spectacle - or would be if it wasn't for the vicious conceit of Wood and her tiny band of nobodies, embodied in their contempt for the victims of the hijackings, crashes, and ensuing damage. Fortunately, they have no effect whatsoever in the real world. As an empirical demonstration, consider that in this thread, four years ago one of her followers airily asserted that Crazy Judy was "in postion to command answers" from two high-technology companies that she had fixated on as prime conspirators in her fantasy.

How'd that work out? I'll give you three guesses.

The funny thing was that they weren't even companies that made directed-energy weapons, which her follower couldn't identify even after I gave him a list.

So, to make a long story short - the answer to your question "Who is Judy Wood?" is, "the chief freak in a very small freak show".
 
Her claims are insane. Her website is anti-intellectual claptrap, and anti-science. He does not use physics or math to come up with her fantasy.

NIST, the 911 Commission, and most first graders are intellectual Giants compared to Judy's work.

Jammy don't care about logic or true, factual evidence; He believes Judy Wood. That virtually removes him from having anything credible to argue seriously.
 
Wait, so is WTC Dust the person who gave the dust samples to Steven Jones for his ATM Bentham paper that he published in 2009?
 
Looks like you've uncovered (uncorked?) the foaming gun.

Either one sounds suggestive. I ask because I find it odd that someone who has stated that she doesn't like Jones and instead, supports Judy Wood, would be the person who sent in dust samples to Jones.

At a first glance I guess that would suggest integrity of some form. Should I make a new thread asking if she is willing to send her samples to Millette? Am I just really out of the loop here?
 
Divorcing who? Cheating on who?

I think you watch too much "teevee".

Now that's a serious insult :D

I do not watch teevee at all, thank you very much. However, I can't avoid seeing the tabloids at the grocery store and other similar places.

Teevee...

Well I nevah...
 
Why is that? Does she have some kind of psychosexual hold over certain kinds of individuals?

That's an unknown, but some conspiracy theorists seem to gravitate toward her and believe she has credibility. What makes them do it? Perhaps birds of a feather...
 
Now that's a serious insult :D

I do not watch teevee at all, thank you very much. However, I can't avoid seeing the tabloids at the grocery store and other similar places.

Teevee...

Well I nevah...

Well that's your problem right there! If you watched teevee, you'd have seen what the rest of the world saw. Planes.
 
How can anyone listen to Judy Woods and take anything she says seriously? DEW weapons, foam, etc. It's not even that I am against that line of thinking. I mean, honestly, way to think outside the box. The mainstream thermite theory is getting rather redundant, and at least this offers a new line of thinking....kind of.

The thing that bothers me is that she doesn't even pretend to know what she's talking about. People will address her with actual questions and she will reply with "I don't need to know those things." Yes, you certainly do. In my job I get asked questions about implementations we are considering everyday. How certain applications will affect the current operating systems? What the software we are installing actually does? When will purchasing the product pay itself off in lowered service times?

If I were to look at my boss and say, "I don't need to know those things." He'd tell me to kick rocks, and find a new job.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom