This is not the April Stundie nomination thread

I am expecting some real fireworks from David Icke and his followers when "The Amazing Spider Man" opens in July,since the villian is going to be Curt Connors/The Lizard...
 
Straight men are having homosexual sex with women:
http://traditionalchristianity.wordpress.com/2012/04/17/pretend-sex/#comment-50051

It matters a lot, at a practical level, because it normalizes behavior for which you don’t need a complementary pair.
The spread of anal and oral sex among heterosexuals has erased the innate “yuck” factor from homosexual sex. We’re doing everything they’re doing, so what differentiates our sexual relations from theirs anymore? We’re straight sodomizers and we marry, so why shouldn’t gay sodomizers marry? We enter into a marriage we know to be infertile, so why shouldn’t infertile gay couples marry? Straight men have abandoned all natural law arguments that ground the justification for heterosexual marriage by lying with their wives as if they were men.
We’re all sodomizers now.
Click to expand...
 
Travis said:
That was Austria's premiere bigfoot hunting team only because the coaches poll is biased. Everyone knows that Team Sasquatchenfootknicklebooten is really the best they have to offer.
Click to expand...

Regardless of the coaches poll if that what their premier team was doing I would hate to think what box canyon the B squad got lost in following their echos.
 
ElMondoHummus said:
I was amped over the potential for this topic, which sparked my interest, but quite quickly I've lost the energy to continue. I'm drained, short fused, I feel grounded, and I admit to joining this out of impulse, not any sense of continuity. Therefore, at this junction I feel I must discharge any responsibility for adding to this derail and once again become a neutral presence, being neither a positive nor negative influence upon all participants. But as a last act, let me unleash a surge of anger upon the target of my ire: That damned electricity! Dielectric! DIE!!!
Click to expand...

You win the interwebs!!

clapq.gif


I bow humbly in your presence, oh Master of Pun.
 
SnakeTongue said:
Not sources, but evidence! Did you read anywhere in my posts asking you to provide sources?

When you will even understand such easy concept. You have a brilliant mind, it is easy to polish this concept over it.

I am not proving anything with the list.
Click to expand...

Primary sources aren't evidence? Then what, exactly, are they? What counts as "evidence" if not a primary source?
 
thedopefishlives said:
Primary sources aren't evidence? Then what, exactly, are they? What counts as "evidence" if not a primary source?
Click to expand...

In the ct world it is mostly speculation. If you can imagine it happened then it just as likely as all other options. Primary sources are usually government lies anyway.
 
Not a CT but screw it:

longagocreature asked: What will happen if gay marriage is legalized?

The Wrath of Satan will be upon us…….

This is my favorite blog you guys.
 
Dessi said:
Have to nominate this one:



You don't want to catch T3H GHEY, do you?
Click to expand...

The follow up was awesome.

I guess the word biphobia isn't prevalent because bisexuals aren't impotent (ie. there's nothing to fear).
Click to expand...

And the (politically incorrect minority) guy says, " Well, if I'm gonna be im-po-tent, I'm gonna look im-po-tent!"
 
Biscuit said:
In the ct world it is mostly speculation. If you can imagine it happened then it just as likely as all other options. Primary sources are usually government lies anyway.
Click to expand...

Oh, I know. It just left me taken aback a little bit to see a CTer actually have the balls to come out and say they don't accept primary sources as evidence.
 
thedopefishlives said:
Oh, I know. It just left me taken aback a little bit to see a CTer actually have the balls to come out and say they don't accept primary sources as evidence.
Click to expand...

Oh it gets even better when in the face of eye witness testimony they claim that the eyewitness was saying the opposite of what they actually said.

Anders Lindman did this in his titanic conspiracy thread with regards to the testimony of Harold Bishop the wireless operator on board. Not quite stundie worthy but it was close.
 
Biscuit said:
Oh it gets even better when in the face of eye witness testimony they claim that the eyewitness was saying the opposite of what they actually said.

Anders Lindman did this in his titanic conspiracy thread with regards to the testimony of Harold Bishop the wireless operator on board. Not quite stundie worthy but it was close.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I've seen Robert Prey pull this in the JFK Conspiracy thread. And when someone calls him on it his one-word reply is "Baloney."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom