• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged General Holocaust denial discussion thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
If this question has been brought up and discused before (please do not limb me in with these kooky deniers), please forgive me: but wouldn't the easiest way to demonstrate how these gas chambers worked would to actually use them with harmless visible gas? I only ask because I'm fairly certain the demonstration has been done... More than once.
 
You type like a fanatical religious person, which insist that his holy book is the only right.

The deity: supposed exterminated Jews

The religion: Holocaust

The holy book: countless misinterpreted evidence

The sin: dare to question the holy word and the existence of the deity

The evil enemy: the revisionists, vulgarly called "deniers"

The holy land: Auschwitz-Birkenau camp

That only reinforce the credibility of people like Robert Faurisson:

Against Hollywoodism, Revisionism

This is a pretty damned stupid post. I can only assume that it is your lack of knowledge in the English language that made you put together something this stupid.
 
This is a pretty damned stupid post. I can only assume that it is your lack of knowledge in the English language that made you put together something this stupid.

I have to point out that lack of understanding the English language is not an indication of intelligence. It's the lack of understanding of reality that is.
 
You're going to be waiting a long time, so get used to it.

It's how these people operate here.
In point of fact, not only is this thread filled with summaries of documents, findings, and witness testimonies, as well as analysis of such evidence, but SnakeTongue has been referred to at least 4 major online discussions of the evidence and a number of printed works. What you need to get used to is staring down all that evidence.
 
I have to point out that lack of understanding the English language is not an indication of intelligence. It's the lack of understanding of reality that is.
Touting Faurisson whilst asking who Himmler was sounds like a bad joke in any language.
 
Still skirting that pesky little question why the nazis would document their mass murder... tsk tsk.
 
In point of fact, not only is this thread filled with summaries of documents, findings, and witness testimonies, as well as analysis of such evidence, but SnakeTongue has been referred to at least 4 major online discussions of the evidence and a number of printed works. What you need to get used to is staring down all that evidence.

Ha, ha, ha...

"documents"

"findings" (that one is my favorite)

"witness testimonies"

Now that's conclusive evidence!
 
Ha, ha, ha...

"documents"

"findings" (that one is my favorite)

"witness testimonies"

Now that's conclusive evidence!
I see you a) haven't read through the thread, b) haven't checked the links, and c) haven't a clue about how history is researched and understood. Good for you.
 
Translation:

Damn it, our propaganda doesn't work on you!
No, translation: you apparently have nothing substantive to offer.

If you did, you would point out the problems you think exist in the evidence cited and discussed in this thread. Since you don't, you appear to be out on a troll.
 
No, translation: you apparently have nothing substantive to offer.

If you did, you would point out the problems you think exist in the evidence cited and discussed in this thread. Since you don't, you appear to be out on a troll.

Translation:

Unless you see things our way, you have nothing substantive to offer. By the way, you are a troll, just because.

Do you guys all repeat the same crap like parrots, or what?
 
Translation:

Unless you see things our way, you have nothing substantive to offer. By the way, you are a troll, just because.

Do you guys all repeat the same crap like parrots, or what?

Well here's a simple question for you that shouldn't need 'translation', since you dismiss documents, findings, and eyewitness testimony what is your definition of 'conclusive evidence'?
 
Translation:

Unless you see things our way, you have nothing substantive to offer. By the way, you are a troll, just because.

Do you guys all repeat the same crap like parrots, or what?
I don't know how you see things because you haven't said anything about the things we discuss in this thread.

All you've done is post some general dismissals and ad hominems without offering any reasons whatsoever and without having participated in the discussion up til now. And that is why you're a troll, because you make empty posts without substance to flame the thread. If it gives you jollies, fine.

I am just pointing out that you haven't contributed anything worthwhile to this discussion. To do so, you'd have to 1) comment specifically on the evidence under discussion in this thread or 2) explain what in your view is the kind of evidence that should be used to answer the questions under discussion in this thread.
 
Translation:

Unless you see things our way, you have nothing substantive to offer. By the way, you are a troll, just because.

Do you guys all repeat the same crap like parrots, or what?

Do you guys all repeat the same crap like parrots, or what?
 
In the light of his finding Himmler's first Posen speech "amazing" and that he "really enjoyed" it, his insistence on being shown film of actual gas chamber murders is seriously creepy, isn't it?

Yes, defiling the dead is despicable but hey they were only Jew so what does a few million count:mad:.
 
The ability of Spring Hall Convert to unveil his own lack of knowledge by the copious use of scare quotes and by putting words into our mouths sure is astonishing. I'm just not sure what the practical application of this remarkable talent of his is. Maybe in entertainment... ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom