The 95 Feces of the CEUS SSC Report

[DeathDart]

Thanks for making me look at the maps closer.

Both maps are a bit squirrelly.
The angle of the lighting works well except where I want to look.
Instead of clean coloration it seems blurred like a stereoscopic image slightly offset.

And I found some other things about the new image.

Tom Hildenbrand USGS

T. Hildenbrand began revising the gravity maps in 2002 and here it is 2012 and all I can access (since I don't have any of the special programs that can use the datasets), is a GIF image which I can't even enlarge.

http://research.utep.edu/Portals/73/PDF/Grav.WS_OFR.pdf

Rationale and Operational Plan
to Upgrade the U.S Gravity Database
by Thomas G. Hildenbrand1, Allen Briesacher2, Guy Flanagan3, William J. Hinze4,
A.M. Hittelman5, G.R. Keller6, R.P. Kucks7, Donald Plouff1, Walter Roest8,
John Seeley6, D.A. Smith9, and Mike Webring7
Open-File Report 02-463
2002
1USGS



Mr Hildenbrand appears as references on following pages of CEUS SSC Appendix C
C-48, C-52, C-67, C-68, C-69, C-70, C-77, C-78, C-81, C-116, C-117, C-122, C-124, C-126 4X, C-142

He must have a very good pedigree.

I wonder if I can have him increase the contrast and pull the impact structure out of the background in his next revision?

This is the best I can do.

 

[Sam.I.Am]

As I understand it the New Madrid fault has more to do with the earths crust rebounding from the last ice age and not an impact from space.

 

[Andy_Ross]

That's beacuse you can't see the 'Secret' Gubmint/oil industry Maps.

 

[DeathDart]

As I understand it the New Madrid fault has more to do with the earths crust rebounding from the last ice age and not an impact from space.

Actually I belive you are partly right. I don't have enough information to make more than a guess at the mechanics of the structure.

Think of it as a dinner plate resting on a small ball bearing. You eat your mashed potatoes it pivots one way, you eat your corn it pivots another way.

The ice unbalanced when it was on the plate and did the same when it left.
The gravity map can't hide that mass under New Madrid. This is not a few harmless little cracks.

There is a very old problem under New Madrid and I haven't seen any information that says that we really know what is down there. It is all a bunch of paper studies relying on information that I can't find. A bunch of people have a lot to lose if we figure out what is down there.

The oil companies will be forced to divulge what other geological threats are out there. This is going to be bad for a lot of businesses that don't mind putting us in harms way, to make a buck. AKA following TEPCO and repeating Fukashima.

Do the scans and let the public see the results. Don't fabricate information so that you can make stupid decisions (for all of us) just so that you can make money.

 

[DeathDart]

That's beacuse you can't see the 'Secret' Gubmint/oil industry Maps.

Just because I can't find any real information. Just because it has New Madrid in the title doesn't mean it has real information on what is going on down there.

It is covering up a big deep hole in the ground, by taping some paper over it.

 

[DeathDart]

Mr. Steve Schilt
COCORP Scan of -80.150 32.940

It actually may have been done but the fence projection for that point is literally edge on. It also looks clipped and distorted.

Show me the data, so they show me the paper edge on, very funny.

May I suggest the death of a thousand paper cuts. Now that's funny.

 

[Travis]

I'm pretty sure that the present geologic ideas for the Mid America Rift are solid. They are built off of the well established tendencies for continents to attempt to shear during supercontinent breakups.

 

[DeathDart]

I'm pretty sure that the present geologic ideas for the Mid America Rift are solid. They are built off of the well established tendencies for continents to attempt to shear during supercontinent breakups.

http://mrdata.usgs.gov/geophysics/gravity.html

Switch it over to Bouguer by hitting the plus and also uncheck the shaded relief.

Getting fractured by asteroids doesn't hurt either. Who in Texas pissed off the aliens? Between Texas and a lot of the Midwest, it looks like several areas were hit repeatedly. A billion years is a long time.

Working on showing the interesting parts of that gravity map more clearly.

Think of it as a plate someone dropped, then hammered the pieces, sprayed some glue on it, and then pushed into a corner, to let it set.

New Madrid research is just a sick joke. If it helps them build a Nuclear reactor they will do some shallow scans. I believe Those new Nuclear plants they are building are less then 100 miles from Charleston. They will be designed for a maximum 6.3. Charleston had a 7.3 in 1889. And why do they keep blaming a bunch of faults when the earthquakes are in one small area? No deep scans Sigh.

The COCORP data was just PR, and that was done nearly thirty years ago.

This is a conspiracy to protect people from caution. If you had a gigantic impact crater in your back yard would you want to find it?

Guess what happens when you frack a crater? Just based on probability there are several dozen craters less than twenty miles in diameter, scattered across the 48 states. A lot of things called lineaments appear to be ancient fractures. The cover story is that your eyes are playing tricks on you.

So it must be playing with the gravity sensors eye's too.

This is the biggest lie ever. Literally, they are enormous.

 

[Elizabeth I]

Who in Texas pissed off the aliens?

I don't have a clue what you're on about otherwise, but I do know the answer to this one. It was Rick Perry.

 

[DeathDart]

Well the short version is that the oil companies, nuclear industry, chamber of commerce, and the Girl Scouts are hiding dangerous geological structures from the public.

My pet peeve is impact craters. I found my first one by following the earthquakes in Oklahoma to one little spot on the map. A spot which is a circular feature on satellite images.

I also got the well logs for that area. Flipped layers are a dead give away. Across the crater edge, some layers disappear, or other layers that were 2 feet thick outside the crater, get smeared across tens of feet.

The best part, once you know what to look, is finding the really big, dangerous stuff that they are hiding.

Hiding the the Extinction Level Events.

New Madrid looks like one of the unluckiest spots on Earth.
Either:
There was a direct impact at New Madrid that caused the Devonian extinction.

There were several impacts, spread out over time, that overlapped the area under New Madrid.

Some very large, very old impacts, also seem to have broken the NAM continent up, with the cracks coming together near New Madrid.

http://mrdata.usgs.gov/geophysics/gravity.html

Press the + key and switch it to Bouguer, uncheck the shaded relief.
At the bottom of the screen is a readout of latitude and longitude.

New Madrid about -89.250 37.250

That big circular feature that no one can see, looks to be be an impact structure.

It is not even the biggest one, that I can find on this gravity map.

Why would people hide this?

If people knew how bad it is underground, very little drilling would be allowed. and cheap shoddy housing would be banned.

Oh yeah those nuclear storage sites, and part time power generators, would actually have to find inconvenient, but safe sites to build.

So I invite you to study the data for New Madrid, if you can find any. When the oil companies want to find something, they do a thorough job.

When the oil companies and Nuclear industry don't want to find something, they also do a thorough job.

It is all noise and no information.

Because of the constant interference with having any logical connections being made they are teaching a nonsensical geological delusion to their geology students. They are educating their students not to ask the right questions, or to take their blindfolds off and just look around.

Its like going to medical school and having your teachers calling the germ theory, quackery.

They use two words a lot, Orogeny and Aulacogen. Sometimes, they even use them appropriately.

Any time I see those words, I become deeply skeptical about what is written after that.

 

[DeathDart]

It is more profitable for them to make mistakes, that get us killed.

If we did a blue color job so badly, that people were killed, we can go to prison.

They make these decisions for us, while actively obstructing the public disclosure of these dangerous structures. They are also preventing the government USGS and Department of the Interior, from finding it either.

So the simple solution is, kill the bastards first.

Ok, what is your solution?

 

[DeathDart]

This insanity was spread through our fine educational system to the entire planet.

Potential Impact Crater New Zealand -45.3077,170.0596 50-60 miles in diameter. Age Unknown

So New Zealand has all kinds of earthquakes. The weird part, is that a likely impact crater, appears to be geologically stable. A circular feature west and northwest of Dunedin on the southern island. It appears to be a circular feature on satellite imaging. It appears in some of the Gravity data, but doesn't end up showing up very well in the final product, (aha trained to hide impact structures).

It seems that the impact may have welded the basement geology together, or the impact didn't significantly destabilize a heavy craton. So they are hiding something that doesn't cause big problems. It is geologically active, but is stable when compared to the surrounding area.

A councilman in Dunedin recommended moving the seat of government from earthquake ravaged Christchurch to Dunedin. It might make sense.

Ok, they are hiding something safe?

Bitten by Irony again.

 

[DeathDart]

I created a crude map which outlines the Ragnarok Impact Structure.

You will need this to see the detail on the map.
http://mrdata.usgs.gov/geophysics/gravity.html

Press the + key and switch it to Bouguer, uncheck the shaded relief.
At the bottom of the screen is a readout of latitude and longitude.

New Madrid is about -89.250 37.250


The red circle is New Madrid, I believe this is where the comet or asteroid punched through the crust. This occurred before the Appalachians were in their present position. The "basins" were excavated at this time. They would have the radioactive black shale as their bottom layer

The large southern circle matches up with a fracture. It has to be old because if it were active, we would all know about it.

The large western circle matches up with radial fracture lines in the continent. It is also old.

The blue circle in Texas is a big impact . Probably in the 300 to 400 million year old range.

The blue dashes are lineaments, (probably ancient), structures that are deep in the crust, but still affect strata on the surface. These are imaginary according to industry sponsored psychology. They are clearly visible on the gravity map. An appeal to authority to make the massive fracture lines go away.

The orange lines are minor fracture lines, minor but quite dangerous. The CEUS report was trying to keep all the problems inside of the red circle.

The two upper circles fit some of the features pretty well. Time will tell if these are impact structures.

So according to CEUS this is just a couple of million years old at the outside.

After Ragnarok fell, the CEUS sundial would stop working for a very long time.

 

[DeathDart]

The structure they call a shallow surface fault in Colorado.

It must be fairly old. Yes the Llano Uplift is not anything special. if you are a geologist you better keep on moving, ya here.

http://mrdata.usgs.gov/geophysics/gravity.html

Press the + key and switch it to Bouguer, uncheck the shaded relief.
At the bottom of the screen is a readout of latitude and longitude.


From Wikipedia, Minor Mystery, Ancient Faulting, Orogeny, yep they are hiding something. Estimate it to be roughly 1000+ miles in diameter.

Tightly dated by whom?

Pretty big for a minor surface fault in Colorado. Llano uplift is where the impact occurred, how hard was that to spot? You can see it enter the Gulf of Mexico from deep inside Mexico.

The origin of the Town Mountain Granite—tightly-dated to late Mesoproterozoic times—is a minor mystery, stemming from a debate over whether or not it is related to the Grenville orogeny.[1][2] What is not in doubt in that the Valley Spring and Packsaddle formations are heavily metamorphosed sedimentary rocks, originally deposited south of the North American craton, and altered by subduction or continental collision.[3][4]

The ancient faulting that produced the Llano Uplift is believed to be related to that which produced the Marathon Uplift in west Texas. Both may have been formed around the time of the Ouachita orogeny.

 

[DGM]

This report was done in collaboration with the NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission and is meant to minimize and discount any impact of earthquakes on new or existing Nuclear Plant Licensing.

Did you mean to mention the same organisation twice or did you just screw up the copy and paste? The bold statement is a bit redundant.

 

[DeathDart]

Did you mean to mention the same organisation twice or did you just screw up the copy and paste? The bold statement is a bit redundant.

CEUS is an Industry group. Their main purpose is to twist the truth by appealing to synthetic subject authorities of their own manufacture. They buy the academic chairs and put who they want in them. They either directly control the professional organizations or strongly influence them. The American Geophysical Union.

AGU is a worldwide scientific community that advances, through unselfish cooperation in research, the understanding of Earth and space for the benefit of ...

for the benefit of the people who own us. They are so full of it, that their tongues are brown.

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

You admit there is no actual evidence to support your claims:

Just because I can't find any real information. Just because it has New Madrid in the title doesn't mean it has real information on what is going on down there.

You also admit you don't have the education and experience to evaluate the evidence if you did have it:

If you repeat this information, blame it on an anonymous underground group of geologists. I am an amateur geologist.

I am an amateur so do not have any credentials. You will need to find someone who does.

Yet despite acknowledging that you have nothing to go on, you're still talking about killing people:

So the simple solution is, kill the bastards first.

Why should anyone aside from the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security take you seriously?

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

You say that as if it was a bad thing. I'd be pretty happy to have Fukushima levels of safety, although the latest technology is even safer. Hit by an earthquake and a tidal wave, and yet no serious release of radiation and no deaths (last I heard, anyway).

So move there.

I concur with Zooterkin.

And I have no need to move to Fukushima to demonstrate my convictions to you. I am a member of the Canadian Nuclear Society and have been actively advocating the construction of nuclear reactors in my home province.

The reactors at Fukushima One did perform remarkably well in the face of forces 100 times greater than what they were designed to withstand. The reactors at Fukushima Two were built ten years later, were almost unscathed by the quake and tsunami and can be brought back on-line almost as soon as the Japanese government gives the word.

Modern reactors can be built damn near anywhere, even over your hallucinatory impact craters, with relatively little difficulty.

 

[DeathDart]

The evidence is quite visible on the gravity (Bouguer Anomaly) maps.
http://mrdata.usgs.gov/geophysics/gravity.html

Many are visible as surface features (lineaments) even on Google's patchwork satellite images or on detailed topographic maps. I have personally found the well logs for the Meeker and Choctaw craters. The Choctaw Impact Crater is outlined by a change in the oil field beneath it, on map GM-36 produced by the oil industry.

35.095, -97.185 Choctaw Crater is approximately 66.0 miles across
Earthquakes,Visible Surface Features, Partially Verified in Well Logs >99% Map of Oklahoma Oil and Gas Fields GM-36. Center at 7N1E about section 10 The oil fields go from nearly solid to very splotchy within the crater.

There is more than enough doubt to put their conspiracy on the run by just asking the right questions.

First Question: where is the COCORP data and why has its thorough interpretation been kept from the public?

Why can't the public get access to usable data, why do you have a gate keeper at Cornell?

Is it to ruin the future prospects for any geologists foolish enough to ask the wrong (right) questions. http://www.eas.cornell.edu/ ?

Why was just a reconnaissance scan made? You found out just enough that the land owning aristocracy, didn't even want their trusted lap dogs to see anymore?

When was the last deep scans run of the New Madrid area? Where are those results? Where is the data (in a usable form) so that the public can view it? The public paid for those scans, so an argument of proprietary will be tossed immediately. I don't mean the seventh photocopy of a graph made through wax paper.

No bmp images, no low resolution vaguely viewable images.

Charleston, where are the deep scans of an area that is less than 20 miles in diameter where the earthquakes are still occurring?

My previous post on the Cheraw structure in Colorado showed the audacity of your lies with a tiny little itsy bitsy billion? year old giant impact crater

Why is vibroseis better than explosive charges (shot holes)? Because you can't possibly get any data on the deep mantle with vibroseis? Don't want anybody see anything. I notice that the geologist who ask the right questions can only get air guns. What a ******* coincidence.

If it looks like an impact crater on satellite images, and gravity maps, show us the uncorrupted data rather than using your academic stooges to shout us down.

If a lineament cuts across the entire country on a gravity map, does it really exist?

Where are the impact craters that statistically, should still be there? Or is it there for everyone to see on the gravity maps? You don't even need to squint.

This is the big lie, on a planetary scale.

I didn't have the training or experience. I have considerable evidence that meets a reasonable doubt.

I don't need to know the chemistry of magmas to understand a gravity map.

I don't need to be trained to see a giant circular feature on a satellite image, or to realize that a round circular feature on gravity map and a satellite image , which is exactly shadowed by oil wells indicates that the circular surface features continue underground, is my gosh, an impact structure.
35.250,-100.800 Jeanne d"Arc 101 miles in diameter
Visible Surface Features, Circled by oil and gas wells. >99%

It is called logic, and it was the bedrock of science until money paid for corruption in academia and the government.

The world is affected by your lies. Did American geological science help whitewash the threats at Fukashima just like they are trying to do in New Madrid and Charleston?

Google China on a satellite image, remove the name and road overlay. How many circular features do you see. Impact structures are second (very close second) to the earthquakes generated by tectonic plates. Some impacts might even initiate continental rifts.

I found out in Oklahoma, far from any Tectonic plates, that Impact structures can be the primary cause of Earthquakes. You frack the rubble pile strata of an impact structure, surprise, you get earthquakes

So how does ignorant and greedy geological theories protect the Chinese people from earthquakes?

You have endangered millions of peoples lives, so I ask Column A to Column B.

Column A​

1. an angry mob​

2. a jury​

3. a sleazy corporate lawyer​

4. your Congressmen and Senators​

Column B​

kill the bastards.​

sentence the defendants to some hell hole in Texas or Louisiana .​

make this go away.​

investigate these charges with prejudice (to balance out enabling this to happen by your lack of oversight).​

 

[Andy_Ross]

You say you can't find any data?

Have you looked anywhere other then the Internet?

How about actual Libraries at Universities?

How about Journals?

How can a lack of evidence be evidence?