Do you see breathing oxygen as primitive? How about our physiological requirement to replenish our H2O? Is it old-fashioned to have to eat at all instead of just ingesting the correct array of nutrition tablets?
Irrelevant. We, unlike you, aren't interested in whether or not something is
all-natural!1111(TM)2011, Big Alternative, we care about empirical evidence.
Eating the foods that we're adapted to as provided by Nature isn't primitive, it's logical and life-sustaining. Eating anything else leads to reduced health, disease and a shortened lifespan.
Sorry, but you still have not provided evidence of this. We're not asking about red herrings such as what we're "evolved to do". We're asking for evidence that natural hygiene is good for you.
Talking about primitive, the most sophisticated computer that man has created doesn't come close to the innate intelligence of the human body. Consider that one fertilised ovum contains all the intelligence required to create a human being with its trillions of individual components all working together in harmony for the survival of the whole. Nothing is needed from the mother other than a healthy environment for it to grow in. Nature is well ahead of us and with our current headlong race to extinction, we'll never get a chance to catch up.
More red herrings. Yes, humans are fantastic machines. No, it does not follow from this that natural hygiene is desirable.
Please look up definition of "iatrogenic."
Okay.
iatrogenic /iat·ro·gen·ic/ (i-ă´tro-jen´ik) resulting from the activity of physicians; said of any adverse condition in a patient resulting from treatment by a physician or surgeon.
Your point
? Yes, doctors, like all other people, make mistakes. You're acting as if we've been denying this all along. For someone who complains about other peoples' reading comprehension problems, you're pretty difficult to get through to yourself.
As you asked so nicely, I'm referring to the routine scare-mongering on this thread which says that people like me are guilty of injuring innocent people because we warn against getting vaccinations.
But you are. This isn't "scare-mongering", it's trying to explain to you the consequences of what you're doing. The Jenny McCarthy body count web site, for example, was referred to in an attempt to try to get you to realize that your movement is not playing a game here, but actually injuring and killing people.
If we publicise the seatbelt dangers then people won't wear them and might get killed in an accident and of course it would be our fault. Nothing to do with the industry or the government regulators who should be working on our behalf to ensure our safety or at least the awareness of the risks.
Yes, if you started telling people that seatbelts caused autism, and actually getting people to stop wearing them, would mean that you were directly causing fatalities.
Now apply this logic to vaccines and their actual, real-world statistics that you're refusing to look up.
You're overlooking the word "each."
Conventional medicine's paradigm is that each disease has its own specific cause and a specific cure none of which includes your diet except possibly as aggravating circumstances. They go through elaborate diagnostics to establish what disease you have so that they can decide the appropriate treatment to prescribe. In practice, you wind up a with a cocktail of medicines for various symptoms and a number of those are to counteract the side effects of the main drugs.
Good boy. Edit: except, of course, you are "forgetting" that there's a range of therapy options that have nothing to do with drugs. But nice try.
In Natural Hygiene, there's no need to wait for a diagnosis because if you're unwell, you start a complete rest including a water fast and when you've recovered you return to (or transition to) a healthy lifestyle in accordance with the laws of Nature.
Gotcha. Now post evidence this actually works. Actual evidence, not "breathing is good for you!" or "doctors are evil!". Empirical evidence. If you don't have any, explain to me how you know you're right in the first place.
I'm bowing out now so for answers to your burning questions, please just [insert favorite internet search engine here] Natural Hygiene and start reading. Good luck.
Isn't that an incredibly bold thing to ask us to do given your own refusal to look up even the most basic facts on conventional medicine and vaccines
?
How many vaccines can an immature body handle in a mere two years?
I love how you don't bother to actually figure this out, but rather add the weasel word "delicate" and throw the question out as an argument from ignorance. Nice try.
First you can tell me why all the world's scientists and all the world's medical community, with all the patient data, with all the CPU throw weight they have, cannot figure out why toddlers are becoming autistic?
Good thing we have you to tell us what the world's scientist and medical community, with all their patient data and CPU throw weight, is too dumb to figure out.
