• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Marines Urinating on Dead Guys?

We will see. I doubt it. If image is everything, no one would want to look like a dolt fooled by what is basically a stage play .

So you think the President of Afghanistan is worried about looking like a dolt?

You think some Al Queda retard is going to look closer, see it's a "stage play" and then forgive the infidels?

PLEASE tell me you're not that naive.
 
So you think the President of Afghanistan is worried about looking like a dolt?

You think some Al Queda retard is going to look closer, see it's a "stage play" and then forgive the infidels?

PLEASE tell me you're not that naive.

Considering they flew planes into buildings because they simply didn't like Americans, I kinda doubt they need the excuse. No reason to give it to them, in any case. That's the only problem I see here, it puts our guys in greater danger....I don't give a damn about the dignity of savage trash who do what the Taliban and al-Qaida do.
 
I really don't understand the whole point. Why not leave them the hell alone, and prevent crap like 9/11? If they want to jihad their faces off against each other, who cares?

The only reason I have a problem with this is because we're supposed to be better than them. Apparently that's just propoganda bullcrap. We're no better.
 
How are snipers cowards?


Well, taking advantage of the fact that the victim does not know that you're there pretty much sums up what the term coward basically is all about. On the other hand, coward-drones are worse, but at least they cannot drop urine yet, can they?
 
LOL You must be kidding.

Nope. In a nutshell, without writing a 300 page book on the subject's details, that's exactly why they did what they did.

I really don't understand the whole point. Why not leave them the hell alone, and prevent crap like 9/11? If they want to jihad their faces off against each other, who cares?

The only reason I have a problem with this is because we're supposed to be better than them. Apparently that's just propoganda bullcrap. We're no better.

Urinating on dead carcasses of slime is magnitudes better than slicing the noses and ears off women who flee abusive arranged marriages. Two wrongs don't make a right, sure, but you're saying that the cop who spits on the body of a spree killer he's just taken out are equal in their wrongs.
 
Last edited:
Well, taking advantage of the fact that the victim does not know that you're there pretty much sums up what the term coward basically is all about. On the other hand, coward-drones are worse, but at least they cannot drop urine yet, can they?

Can't you apply this sort of thinking to all projectile weapons?

You'd make a good berserker.
 
Nope. In a nutshell, without writing a 300 page book on the subject's details, that's exactly why they did what they did.

Man, did I get drunk and fall through the mirror in to an alternative dimension again?

Is this the world where people have tails?
 
I really don't understand the whole point. Why not leave them the hell alone, and prevent crap like 9/11? If they want to jihad their faces off against each other, who cares?

oil_derrick.jpg

When the oil is gone we will indeed leave them to club each other to death with empty ak-47's.
 
Can't you apply this sort of thinking to all projectile weapons?


Not really if both sides know that the enemy is there. The coward part isn't the projectile, it's the strategy.
 
Well, taking advantage of the fact that the victim does not know that you're there pretty much sums up what the term coward basically is all about. On the other hand, coward-drones are worse, but at least they cannot drop urine yet, can they?

You might have noticed - war has evolved.

The point isn't dying for your cause. It's making the other guy die for his. Snipers are just fine, and hardly cowards.
 
Well, taking advantage of the fact that the victim does not know that you're there pretty much sums up what the term coward basically is all about. On the other hand, coward-drones are worse, but at least they cannot drop urine yet, can they?

Unless you want to assert that the pictured DB's were non-combatants, your point is moot.

Anybody armed in a conflict is a legit target at any time - which is why a guy lying in a trench triggering an IED on our troops isn't a "coward" either - but the ******** in those planes on 9/11 meet your critera in spades.

Discussions like these make me nostalgic for the days of the draft - I'd love to have certain folks learn the truth for themselves in real time.
 
Nope. In a nutshell, without writing a 300 page book on the subject's details, that's exactly why they did what they did.


But you're not talking about the "because they don't like our freedoms" nonsense, right?

Anyway, did some information leak about the circumstances and their explanation about why they did such a stupid stunt putting every foreign soldier in Afghanistan at risk?
 
Last edited:
Yea, I know the real reason, but it still burns me that we have to be over there at all to "install a democracy"

Who the hell are we to determine what kind of government another country has?

I agree - one of the worst tactical decisions ever made.
 
But you're not talking about the "because they don't like our freedoms" nonsense, right?

Anyway, did some information leak about the circumstances and their explanation about why they did such a stupid stunt putting every foreign soldier in Afghanistan at risk?

Do you really believe they were at any less risk before this ?

Do you think those Talibans will take more carefull aim henceforth ?
 

Back
Top Bottom