Merged So there was melted steel

DGM said:
So what did happen to these solidified pools of steel? Funny no one reported finding them. Did they evaporate?
Click to expand...

Good question. What happened to the solidifed pools of aluminum? :rolleyes:
 
ergo said:
Get back to me when you can show that all these reports were "mistaken".

Actually, your "endless examples" here all lead to the same search results. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

You're just trolling me now, right?

Ive asked this many times now...

Either its an inside job as well, or fire will regularly produce molten metals and steel.

WHICH IS IT?
 
ergo said:
So you haven't found any witness references to molten aluminum in Ground Zero?
Click to expand...

Weird how you base what you believe and what you don't, solely on whether or not someone said they saw it.
 
Last edited:
ergo said:
Gee, um, let me think about that... :rolleyes:


It's an inside job.
Click to expand...

Uh HUH. Did you understand the question?

REPORTS OF MELTED STEEL AND METAL IN ALL THOSE OTHER FIRES.....

....were actually "inside jobs" by the government? Really?


Why hasnt the truth movement pounced on so many false flag attacks again? Against ...uh... bridges and random buildings and schools and so on? Want to rethink your answer?:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
ergo said:
The question asked was, "What kind of molten metal did Leslie Robertson see flowing in a little river?" and EdX answers "melted metal". Okey dokey....:D

EdX, why do you think the firefighter who showed Robertson this trickle of molten metal under the concrete found it remarkable enough to show him, and why did Robertson find it remarkable enough to comment on at his address at Stanford?
Click to expand...

IDK if you've mentioned it before or after your post here or if anyone else pointed it out but....
He did say in the same video that the fireman showed him this "many months" after 9/11. Are you saying thermite was still doing its job in January '02? February?
 
Just to hypothesize..... If solid pieces of molten metal were actually proof of something such as a conspiracy formed because of the micro mini super duper laws of science breaking thermite, why were they not covered up?

I am sure if the lizard men could spends months and months preparing a quite frankly huge building for demo, shipping the countless tons of thermit in, placing it in situe, setting triggering devices and planting the homing beacon without being spotted doing it, then a few chunks of metal should be easy to hide?

As I said before I believe there would be melted metal, so my explanation is that there would be no need to try and hide it.
 
ergo said:
No, I don't think all metals are steel.

But nor is it credible for you to claim that all these people, including firefighters, engineers and other professionals are "mistaken" and should be ignored. This simply isn't credible.
Click to expand...
do you think firefighters can identify melted steel from melted aluminum or melted iron or melted copper from just looking at it?
 
OCaptain said:
do you think firefighters can identify melted steel from melted aluminum or melted iron or melted copper from just looking at it?
Click to expand...

He also seems unaware that "steel" is shorthand to many people for "ambiguous heavy metal." The only time people say they are dealing with aluminum is when they know for sure the metal in question is aluminum.


However, in keeping with my thread, it doesn't really matter. Sure, there was melted steel. So far it doesn't seem to matter.
 
I'd just like for them to explain their terms. What do they think was meant by "pools of melted metal/steel?"

How big is a "pool?"

Does "melted" mean "currently red hot and liquid" or "previously liquid but now cooled and solidified?"

How does one tell at a glance, one liquid metal from another?

Why didn't any of the eyewitnesses describe the 2750°F blast furnace effect they must have felt from the molten liquid steel?
 
Travis said:
However, in keeping with my thread, it doesn't really matter. Sure, there was melted steel. So far it doesn't seem to matter.
Click to expand...

It most certainly does matter!

There should not have been any melted steel there if the Official Story is telling the truth.

MM
 
Miragememories said:
It most certainly does matter!

There should not have been any melted steel there if the Official Story is telling the truth.

MM
Click to expand...

TheRedWorm said:
How did you determine that?
Click to expand...

Remarkably I'm going to agree with MM, based on my non-expert knowledge of fire.

Peak temperatures in office/house fires run to ~1200°C, already ~300° short of that required to melt steel. They are also peak temperatures and will inevitably decline.

I don't believe there was molten steel at GZ, full stop, but if it were proven to have been there I'd be looking for a reason other than plain office-contents fire. Electrical arcing*, a broken gas main or something of that nature. Although these two examples (taken off the top of my head) are highly implausible they are infinitely more plausible than therm?te.

I strongly believe that reports of molten steel revolve around other metals being misidentified and/or people being naturally loose with their use of the word 'molten' (like Voorsanger) and/or (possibly) exaggerating for dramatic effect.

edit: now I think of it, small amounts of molten steel could be created by car battery terminals being shorted out by crushed metal. I have a nice notch on a spanner where I managed to touch it against some bodywork while tightening the positive terminal of my battery ;). But such small amounts would, I'm sure, have solidified very quickly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom